Anyone else prefer the '12s over the '13s?
Originally Posted by TOGAN
Doesn't matter how we all approach this thread there's one thing in common......
Um
WE ALL WANT THAT 2013 REAR!!!
Um
WE ALL WANT THAT 2013 REAR!!!
I find my opinion on mustangs evolve as I get used to them. Hated the, "NEW EDGE" style when it first came out. Grew on me in about a year or so. I thought the 2005's were plain, I was really let down by the stock hood vs the prototype hood. I love the 2005s now. When I first got my 2011 I loved everything but the ****. Creeped me out. Now LOVE IT! I think the 2013 looks very different in person. Not really into it right now. I'm sure as I see it cruising around, I'll be a little envious of the changes and newness that those changes represent. C'est la vie!
I find my opinion on mustangs evolve as I get used to them. Hated the, "NEW EDGE" style when it first came out. Grew on me in about a year or so. I thought the 2005's were plain, I was really let down by the stock hood vs the prototype hood. I love the 2005s now. When I first got my 2011 I loved everything but the ****. Creeped me out. Now LOVE IT! I think the 2013 looks very different in person. Not really into it right now. I'm sure as I see it cruising around, I'll be a little envious of the changes and newness that those changes represent. C'est la vie!
Good points above.
I think I'll grow to like the 2013s as well.
That said, the 2013 style is relying on the "more is more" school of car design. There's just a lot more going on everywhere on a body design that was already fairly involving to the eyes (lots of creases and bulges)... I may own a 2013 someday but I'll probably always think the 2010 style is better executed.
It's already bugging me that the revised motor has significantly lower internal friction somehow.
I think I'll grow to like the 2013s as well.
That said, the 2013 style is relying on the "more is more" school of car design. There's just a lot more going on everywhere on a body design that was already fairly involving to the eyes (lots of creases and bulges)... I may own a 2013 someday but I'll probably always think the 2010 style is better executed.
It's already bugging me that the revised motor has significantly lower internal friction somehow.
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Good points above.
I think I'll grow to like the 2013s as well.
That said, the 2013 style is relying on the "more is more" school of car design. There's just a lot more going on everywhere on a body design that was already fairly involving to the eyes (lots of creases and bulges)... I may own a 2013 someday but I'll probably always think the 2010 style is better executed.
It's already bugging me that the revised motor has significantly lower internal friction somehow.
I think I'll grow to like the 2013s as well.
That said, the 2013 style is relying on the "more is more" school of car design. There's just a lot more going on everywhere on a body design that was already fairly involving to the eyes (lots of creases and bulges)... I may own a 2013 someday but I'll probably always think the 2010 style is better executed.
It's already bugging me that the revised motor has significantly lower internal friction somehow.

For me, I was thinking of trading my ten for a 13, but after seeing the GT's front end I think I will just hold onto mine for a while longer. The tail lights look good but I can always add those to mine later on.
Originally Posted by Thomas S
Yes, except for the GT500 which will get the TR6060.
Last edited by HizliBullet; Dec 1, 2011 at 09:19 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
Oct 5, 2015 09:43 AM
Fred_Garvin
2010-2014 Mustang
4
Sep 17, 2015 04:10 PM





