Next-Gen Mustang SVO, Focus RS to share 2.3L turbo
I think that's the first time I've see a suggestion the 5.8 will stay around for the next-gen Stang. Having read the Mustang 5.0 magazine article, I'd like to think all that effort wasn't done for just 2 model years
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
Assuming they can squeeze 30mpg out of the turbo 4, which may be easier said than done. Or Ford may claim 30mpg, but real world figures may not be so rosey.
I think that's the first time I've see a suggestion the 5.8 will stay around for the next-gen Stang. Having read the Mustang 5.0 magazine article, I'd like to think all that effort wasn't done for just 2 model years

Well if you get down to it, the current 5.4 has been steadily improved about every two years. The 2013 5.8 is just another evolution along that line and its still a MOD motor and it still has roots in the 4.6 4v that powered the Terminator.
Ford has managed to keep it relavent despite being what is essentially a decade+ old engine family.
Originally Posted by bob
Well if you get down to it, the current 5.4 has been steadily improved about every two years. The 2013 5.8 is just another evolution along that line and its still a MOD motor and it still has roots in the 4.6 4v that powered the Terminator.
Ford has managed to keep it relavent despite being what is essentially a decade+ old engine family.
Anyway, I have had such a hard time with how much I am intrigued by the 2013 5.8L. So much so I'm abandoning the thought of the Boss just so I can taste that sweet engine. I know the Coyote/Roadrunner is the way of the future but there is just something about the new mod engine that gets me going!
Not to get off topic. I am interested to see where this small 4 goes with the talk of it being in the Mustang. I've always associated them with cars like the 240sx and the likes. But I have faith.
Last edited by Automagically; Feb 23, 2012 at 07:56 AM.
I love the 5.8. I see it as a swift kick in the nuts to government motors. Like oh cute camaro ZL1... Check out my biceps lol. If I could afford the 2013 GT500 I'd get it. Trust me. I don't know where to go next after my 2004 GT. I was thinking '04 cobra, 2012 or 13 boss, 2015 something. If they hit this 2015 on the head I maybe all for it. But a 2013 boss would be soooooo sweet. I don't know. I'm torn.
But again back to the 4banger. I think for the SVO to succeed I think they'll have to produce at least 350hp, have special interior and exterior upgrades, performance close if not better then the GT, and 30mpg. If ford can pull that off I think we have a winner. I don't know what market they are trying to fill. Are they going for a below or above the v6? Anyone know?
But again back to the 4banger. I think for the SVO to succeed I think they'll have to produce at least 350hp, have special interior and exterior upgrades, performance close if not better then the GT, and 30mpg. If ford can pull that off I think we have a winner. I don't know what market they are trying to fill. Are they going for a below or above the v6? Anyone know?
Well Ford is messing around with a 177hp 1 liter 3 cylinder engine, I'm sure something will come from that. Maybe even a cool 300+hp 2.3 I4
Last edited by bob; Feb 25, 2012 at 11:37 PM.
Originally Posted by bob
Would be neat if they updated the heads on the 5.8 next go around. These are essentially the same heads that have been around since the Ford GT. I'm honestly surprised they haven't gone under the 8-axis cutter for a little improvement in airflow.
Seems like they were exploring all avenues on the 5.8. I'm guessing the only way to go further or make things more efficient is to start with a new design.
Originally Posted by bob
Well with a supercharger that is certainly true
Or the budget wasn't there? The GT500 castings are by all accounts pretty heavy for a 4v setup so a change in architecture to something akin to the coyote head could shed a few pounds and since those heads flow a bit more than the GT500 castings it would be nice to see a similar improvement in a new head if for nothing other than a reduction in airflow resistance which would heat the air less and the inclusion of TiVCT would be nice as well. Not so much for an increase in peak power but more power under the curve and maybe even a boost in economy(???? - TiVCT like the variable cam phasing on the 3v can reduce pumping losses while the engine is just cruising) since its always good when you can duck the GG tax with just a little more margin.
Or the budget wasn't there? The GT500 castings are by all accounts pretty heavy for a 4v setup so a change in architecture to something akin to the coyote head could shed a few pounds and since those heads flow a bit more than the GT500 castings it would be nice to see a similar improvement in a new head if for nothing other than a reduction in airflow resistance which would heat the air less and the inclusion of TiVCT would be nice as well. Not so much for an increase in peak power but more power under the curve and maybe even a boost in economy(???? - TiVCT like the variable cam phasing on the 3v can reduce pumping losses while the engine is just cruising) since its always good when you can duck the GG tax with just a little more margin.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonathonK
GT350
38
Apr 28, 2016 08:11 PM




