05-09 Exterior Modifications Making Your '05 Stand Out from the Crowd

Lower 0.5"...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 07:04 AM
  #21  
StangNut's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 13
A full gas tank brings the rear end down about 1/4". I checked.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:07 AM
  #22  
RandyB's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by StangNut
A full gas tank brings the rear end down about 1/4". I checked.
You and H&R, apparently.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:13 AM
  #23  
StangNut's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 13
Yes, but the rear needs to be dropped more than the front. Even with a full tank of gas.

The biggest problem is the way Ford designed the car. First, the body itself has a raked look built into it so even if the rocker panel was exactly parallel to the ground, the car would still look like it was slanted.

Also, if you could make it level there'd be a much bigger wheel well gap in the front than in the back.

Sucks either way.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #24  
RandyB's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by StangNut
Yes, but the rear needs to be dropped more than the front. Even with a full tank of gas.

The biggest problem is the way Ford designed the car. First, the body itself has a raked look built into it so even if the rocker panel was exactly parallel to the ground, the car would still look like it was slanted.

Also, if you could make it level there'd be a much bigger wheel well gap in the front than in the back.

Sucks either way.
I know what you're saying - there is no escaping the rake completely because it is by design. A lot of cars are done the same way. Just look at the front and rear wheel arches relative to the door moulding on most cars and you can see that. It gives it a dynamic look even when not in motion. I don't mind it. At least you never really get the sense that it is going uphill.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2006 | 03:29 AM
  #25  
CannonBaller's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 29, 2004
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
i think, i just found the perfect lowering kit.

Steeda's Ultralite lowering kit for 05-06...drops 1" front and 1.25" rear.

Now...does anyone have these installed and can post some pics.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #26  
Boltzman's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2005
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 2
From: Tampa,FL
Originally Posted by StangNut
It's amazing how large that small distance can look.
As soon as I put in my rear springs, I thought I had done something wrong because the back looked a lot lower than what I expected. But when I took new measurements, it was only 1-1/16" drop.
Jason,I'm thinking of getting Steeda rear springs. I really don't want to do the front though. How do you like the rear only and do you think I should get rear adjustable shocks for a softer ride??
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #27  
StangNut's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 13
Chuck,
I don't think you'll notice much difference in the ride quality. I felt more of a change going to the 18" wheels than doing the springs.
The one negative would have to be that the wheel well gap is larger in the front than in the back. However, I think only us Mustangers would even notice it.
But that is greatly outweighed by how much it improves the look of the car. And the best part is that it actually makes the back of the car look smaller. Which, IMO, looked fat and bloated.

Hey, in 3 weeks you can see how it looks in person at the MCA show.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 09:41 PM
  #28  
Boltzman's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2005
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 2
From: Tampa,FL
Originally Posted by StangNut
Chuck,
I don't think you'll notice much difference in the ride quality. I felt more of a change going to the 18" wheels than doing the springs.
The one negative would have to be that the wheel well gap is larger in the front than in the back. However, I think only us Mustangers would even notice it.
But that is greatly outweighed by how much it improves the look of the car. And the best part is that it actually makes the back of the car look smaller. Which, IMO, looked fat and bloated.

Hey, in 3 weeks you can see how it looks in person at the MCA show.
Do you have to buy 4 springs or can you just buy 2?? I wish I could go to the MCA show. Unfortunately someones gotta pay the bills around here
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #29  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Put a bag of concrete in the trunk for a .5" drop
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 05:09 PM
  #30  
StangNut's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 5,448
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Boltzman
Do you have to buy 4 springs or can you just buy 2?? I wish I could go to the MCA show. Unfortunately someones gotta pay the bills around here
No. Not if you buy their standard springs. (I forget what they're called) You can buy just the rears and they're only a little over half of what a full set would cost.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
Evil_Capri
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
2
Sep 25, 2015 12:56 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 10, 2015 12:44 PM
robjh22
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
4
Sep 8, 2015 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.