View Poll Results: Is the gt500 conversion considered rice?
Yes



10
11.76%
No



54
63.53%
depends.....



21
24.71%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll
Are gt500 conversions considered rice?
in 1967: take a Lemans and put GTO body parts on it... That's totally lame.
in 1968: a base Mustang with a GT500 KR "body kit"... So weak.
in 1970: making a RoadRunner look like a Superbird... Go home.
Any of these fakes would be great to have now
but a GT500 conversion on a S197... Poser, See me in 40 years.
That's my opinion. To each his own.
in 1968: a base Mustang with a GT500 KR "body kit"... So weak.
in 1970: making a RoadRunner look like a Superbird... Go home.
Any of these fakes would be great to have now
but a GT500 conversion on a S197... Poser, See me in 40 years.
That's my opinion. To each his own.
good point...
I don't see an issue with simple bumper/grill conversions (clearly because I'm planning one myself in the next month or two) but it gets a little iffier for me when it gets down to full badging, etc
My car will be retaining it's Roush rear spoiler even after the Shelby nose/hood go on, so I feel I'm in pretty safe territory (i.e. not making a carbon copy clone)
In any event, "Rice" isn't nearly the right word for the stuff being discussed here. None of it relates to overblown import tuner culture. Probably "Tacky or not?" would be better than "Rice"
My car will be retaining it's Roush rear spoiler even after the Shelby nose/hood go on, so I feel I'm in pretty safe territory (i.e. not making a carbon copy clone)
In any event, "Rice" isn't nearly the right word for the stuff being discussed here. None of it relates to overblown import tuner culture. Probably "Tacky or not?" would be better than "Rice"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM



