Spoiler Delete=Performance or Cosmetic?
11/23/06, 01:18 PM
#42
Legacy TMS Member
I would have to agree with that.
11/23/06, 04:25 PM
#44
Meet Krissy, Our Star Racer
Join Date: March 19, 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
spoiler delete = hotness! (oh, and purly cosmetic, there's no way the stock spoiler does anything technical)
11/23/06, 06:58 PM
#45
GT Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Location: Mission, TX
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 2002 Corvette didn't have a L98 5.7 with 245hp like in the spec sheet you posted, the last 'vette to have that engine was in 1991. There was never a Stealth even produced in 2002...In fact the 02 'vettes had the LS1 with 345hp.
The last Stealth R/T was a 1996 model which had 320hp from 94-96. It was the 90-93 that made 300hp.
The last Stealth R/T was a 1996 model which had 320hp from 94-96. It was the 90-93 that made 300hp.
11/23/06, 07:10 PM
#46
I've seen some wierd spoilers on some the import.I suppose they figure they look intimidating or something like that.One car I had about 5 years ago was this 69'Javelin SST 390(AMC)w/4spd 3:90 gears had this overhead type of spoiler from the factory.It prolly didn't do a darn thing but I like the styling.
11/23/06, 07:35 PM
#47
Dethroned Nascar Guru
11/23/06, 09:13 PM
#48
The 2002 Corvette didn't have a L98 5.7 with 245hp like in the spec sheet you posted, the last 'vette to have that engine was in 1991. There was never a Stealth even produced in 2002...In fact the 02 'vettes had the LS1 with 345hp.
The last Stealth R/T was a 1996 model which had 320hp from 94-96. It was the 90-93 that made 300hp.
The last Stealth R/T was a 1996 model which had 320hp from 94-96. It was the 90-93 that made 300hp.
SLAP!!!... Take that!..
AT 120 miles an hour + spoilers are functional.. below that there just looky's
11/24/06, 08:46 AM
#50
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: It's tough in the jungle !
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
11/24/06, 09:45 AM
#53
There was this guy from Texas,last name was Hall and ran a car called the Chapparel(spell check). His contribution to motor sports was the rear spoiler.It was actually thought it would help with braking which it did via a cable,but what they didn't expect was the added down force which gave the car more rear end traction giving the car quicker track times.
The factory spoiler isn't all that aerodynamic but to some folks they like them just like side scoops that don't cool the brakes or 1/4 glass louvers that don't vent in fresh air, my stock hood scoop is just as phony.
The factory spoiler isn't all that aerodynamic but to some folks they like them just like side scoops that don't cool the brakes or 1/4 glass louvers that don't vent in fresh air, my stock hood scoop is just as phony.
11/24/06, 11:00 AM
#54
Oh yeah, you were wrong about the Vet too... 
. A little more on-line research is needed from you 
. I usually don't go below 120 mph; even in my driveway. I guess mine is functional 
. Great insight! 
11/24/06, 11:17 AM
#55
I lust for a M24
Join Date: November 6, 2004
Location: Football HOF, Canton OH
Posts: 7,045
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
. Could we get any more unrealistic comparisons. On our cars, any difference would be minimal at best. Cars with functional spoilers take the proper suspension and setup, not to mention weight percentages and the air movement under the car. These are mass produced Ford Mustangs people. For a second I thought I accidentally clicked on forums.bigricewingsaddhorsepower.com
BTW - that Steelers/Browns game sucked last weekend.
11/24/06, 11:28 AM
#56
Right there with... with well NASCAR uses them..... Could we get any more unrealistic comparisons. On our cars, any difference would be minimal at best. Cars with functional spoilers take the proper suspension and setup, not to mention weight percentages and the air movement under the car.
These are mass produced Ford Mustangs people. For a second I thought I accidentally clicked on forums.bigricewingsaddhorsepower.com
BTW - that Steelers/Browns game sucked last weekend.
. Could we get any more unrealistic comparisons. On our cars, any difference would be minimal at best. Cars with functional spoilers take the proper suspension and setup, not to mention weight percentages and the air movement under the car. These are mass produced Ford Mustangs people. For a second I thought I accidentally clicked on forums.bigricewingsaddhorsepower.com
BTW - that Steelers/Browns game sucked last weekend.
Yeah, FOR YOU!!! Buck the Frowns!!!
11/24/06, 12:05 PM
#57
Needs to be more Astony
not that it matters much but the vette from 2001-2004 was rated 350hp. there was a 5hp bump in all the Ls1 cars in 2001 due to a change in the fuel injectors and stuff.
11/24/06, 05:23 PM
#58
Bullitt Member
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I never thought much of white....until now. That is one smooth, clean machine. I'd like to delete my spoiler just to see what it looks but it sounds like it's a PITA to peel away the double-sided tape.
11/24/06, 06:56 PM
#59
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: It's tough in the jungle !
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
11/24/06, 07:01 PM
#60
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am going to have to disagree and Ford would as well. Ford spent considerable time working on the aero of the GT500.