Lets see everones current E.T.'s
11/26/05, 01:05 PM
#21
Member
Join Date: May 20, 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well i have to say i suck but here goes:
reaction=.553
Vehicle RT=.553
60ft=====1.98
MPH=====86.21
ET=======8.397
Now a good driver:Adam From ST. MOTORSPORTS Drving:
REACTION------.547
VEHICLE RT----.547
60FT-------------1.659
MPH---------------87.55
ET-----------------7.884
reaction=.553
Vehicle RT=.553
60ft=====1.98
MPH=====86.21
ET=======8.397
Now a good driver:Adam From ST. MOTORSPORTS Drving:
REACTION------.547
VEHICLE RT----.547
60FT-------------1.659
MPH---------------87.55
ET-----------------7.884
12/10/05, 10:54 AM
#24
New best 1/8-mile numbers:
12/9/05 - Qualcomm Stadium (1/8-mi temporary track)
Mods: C&L CAI, SCT XCal2 w/BamaChips Torq tune, 4.10 gears, M/T Drag Radials (w/auto trans)
60' = 1.965
330' = not recorded
1/8 = 8.509
1/8mph = 82.26
[1/4-mi equiv ~13.21]
I also collected my 7th trophy last night... for 1st Place in the ET3 Class. :w00t:
12/9/05 - Qualcomm Stadium (1/8-mi temporary track)
Mods: C&L CAI, SCT XCal2 w/BamaChips Torq tune, 4.10 gears, M/T Drag Radials (w/auto trans)
60' = 1.965
330' = not recorded
1/8 = 8.509
1/8mph = 82.26
[1/4-mi equiv ~13.21]
I also collected my 7th trophy last night... for 1st Place in the ET3 Class. :w00t:
12/10/05, 06:17 PM
#25
FR500 Member
Join Date: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I finally did it 
Quite pleased as well 
Best R/T -.001 (no redlight)
Best 60 ft 2.0
Best 1/4 ET 13.7 @ 100
Track location: Speedworld Motorplex, Surprise AZ Elevation 1250 ft.
Corrected sea level time and ET 13.2@103
I got to the track and watched for a bit before running. After seeing my fellow 05 stangers running 14's and 15's, I started to wonder if I needed my helmet!
I pulled the best time on my first run 13.7@100 with a 2.0 60 ft. My reaction times were fantastic not one of my runs reaction time started with a whole number.
What I found worked best for me was NOT doing a spectacular burnout. Stayed out of the water, cleaned em off a bit and only brake torqued to about 1,500 rpms is what gave me my best time.
Quite pleased as well Best R/T -.001 (no redlight)
Best 60 ft 2.0
Best 1/4 ET 13.7 @ 100
Track location: Speedworld Motorplex, Surprise AZ Elevation 1250 ft.
Corrected sea level time and ET 13.2@103
I got to the track and watched for a bit before running. After seeing my fellow 05 stangers running 14's and 15's, I started to wonder if I needed my helmet!
I pulled the best time on my first run 13.7@100 with a 2.0 60 ft. My reaction times were fantastic not one of my runs reaction time started with a whole number.
What I found worked best for me was NOT doing a spectacular burnout. Stayed out of the water, cleaned em off a bit and only brake torqued to about 1,500 rpms is what gave me my best time.
12/11/05, 07:00 PM
#27
Welcome to the club, Tony!!
Curious though... how did you come up with the altitude-corrected time. The formulas I've seen would be more like 13.50's. Also, one of the two tracks here is at 1,450 feet (and the other is at basically sea level) and I typically see 1 to 2 tenths difference between the two.
Curious though... how did you come up with the altitude-corrected time. The formulas I've seen would be more like 13.50's. Also, one of the two tracks here is at 1,450 feet (and the other is at basically sea level) and I typically see 1 to 2 tenths difference between the two.
12/12/05, 07:40 AM
#28
FR500 Member
Join Date: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I pulled it out of my butt 
Someone posted a link in here somewhere with the correction factors, that's what I used. Truth be told I was surprised at that number too, seems like an awful lot for 1200 ft.
The main reason for my glee, was that everyone else with me was in the 14's and had problems with traction. Those Nitto's hook real well at the track (What's left of them) And as you well know are extremely dry air doesn't do us any favors either.
I'm gonna try running at night and see what the difference is. Better air and lower temps should bring that down a bit.
Someone posted a link in here somewhere with the correction factors, that's what I used. Truth be told I was surprised at that number too, seems like an awful lot for 1200 ft.
The main reason for my glee, was that everyone else with me was in the 14's and had problems with traction. Those Nitto's hook real well at the track (What's left of them) And as you well know are extremely dry air doesn't do us any favors either.
I'm gonna try running at night and see what the difference is. Better air and lower temps should bring that down a bit.
12/12/05, 09:35 AM
#29
Originally posted by SixtySix@December 12, 2005, 6:43 AM
And as you well know are extremely dry air doesn't do us any favors either.
I'm gonna try running at night and see what the difference is. Better air and lower temps should bring that down a bit.
And as you well know are extremely dry air doesn't do us any favors either.
I'm gonna try running at night and see what the difference is. Better air and lower temps should bring that down a bit.
And dry air is actually a good thing!! That's one problem I get here at the Qualcomm track. Even though it is near sea level, it can also have a lot of moisture in the air at night. On those rare occasions when its both cool and dry (like once so far this year... haha), it makes a difference for sure!!
12/14/05, 04:16 PM
#31
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the sig............
12/15/05, 12:23 PM
#32
R/T .247
60 ft 2.065
8.791 @ 81.19
13.633 @ 101.21
Auto on street tires
JLT CAI and DTP Predator tune
This was in the height of a blazing summer day too - now that it is colder here and I am running new tunes from Doug I am eager to see any difference in numbers.....
60 ft 2.065
8.791 @ 81.19
13.633 @ 101.21
Auto on street tires
JLT CAI and DTP Predator tune
This was in the height of a blazing summer day too - now that it is colder here and I am running new tunes from Doug
I am eager to see any difference in numbers.....
1/7/06, 11:31 AM
#35
New best 1/8-mile numbers:
1/6/06 - Qualcomm Stadium (1/8-mi temporary track)
Mods: C&L CAI, SCT XCal2 w/BamaChips Torq tune, LT headers, 4.10 gears, M/T Drag Radials (w/auto trans)
60' = 1.951
330' = not recorded
1/8 = 8.437
1/8mph = 82.72
[1/4-mi equiv ~13.10]
1/6/06 - Qualcomm Stadium (1/8-mi temporary track)
Mods: C&L CAI, SCT XCal2 w/BamaChips Torq tune, LT headers, 4.10 gears, M/T Drag Radials (w/auto trans)
60' = 1.951
330' = not recorded
1/8 = 8.437
1/8mph = 82.72
[1/4-mi equiv ~13.10]
1/14/06, 10:39 PM
#37
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and SixtySix, when i was at speedworld last week i couldnt get traction for nothing either. I couldnt even post a 14 second run. Was at firebird last night in the 03 cobra, and discovered it needed a clutch lol.
1/17/06, 08:32 PM
#40
Bullitt Member
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
last time out november: 13.08@ 103my mph was off due to not having it dyno tuned after i replaced the converter. base dyno(as that run was made) 267hp/273tq after tune 281hp/322tq all on a"mustang dyno". he picked me up 70+ ft.lbs. of torque at 3300rpm and the least gain was 14hp/40tq.
i think it should run some 12's now if only the tracks were open around here in MD!
i think it should run some 12's now if only the tracks were open around here in MD!