GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Lets see everones current E.T.'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #21  
smp's Avatar
smp
Member
 
Joined: May 20, 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Well i have to say i suck but here goes:
reaction=.553
Vehicle RT=.553
60ft=====1.98
MPH=====86.21
ET=======8.397


Now a good driver:Adam From ST. MOTORSPORTS Drving:
REACTION------.547
VEHICLE RT----.547
60FT-------------1.659
MPH---------------87.55
ET-----------------7.884
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #22  
scrming's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Looks like I'm the only V6 here besides Mike @ Powerhouse...

13.4 @ 103 with street tires... mods in sig... need to get something a little stickier next spring... hehehehe...
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #23  
Dysan's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 27, 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
'05 Manual GT with JLT intake and 93 octane predator tune

13.33 @ 105 on stock tires.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #24  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
New best 1/8-mile numbers:

12/9/05 - Qualcomm Stadium (1/8-mi temporary track)
Mods: C&L CAI, SCT XCal2 w/BamaChips Torq tune, 4.10 gears, M/T Drag Radials (w/auto trans)

60' = 1.965
330' = not recorded
1/8 = 8.509
1/8mph = 82.26

[1/4-mi equiv ~13.21]


I also collected my 7th trophy last night... for 1st Place in the ET3 Class. :w00t:
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #25  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Well, I finally did it Quite pleased as well

Best R/T -.001 (no redlight)
Best 60 ft 2.0

Best 1/4 ET 13.7 @ 100

Track location: Speedworld Motorplex, Surprise AZ Elevation 1250 ft.

Corrected sea level time and ET 13.2@103

I got to the track and watched for a bit before running. After seeing my fellow 05 stangers running 14's and 15's, I started to wonder if I needed my helmet!

I pulled the best time on my first run 13.7@100 with a 2.0 60 ft. My reaction times were fantastic not one of my runs reaction time started with a whole number.

What I found worked best for me was NOT doing a spectacular burnout. Stayed out of the water, cleaned em off a bit and only brake torqued to about 1,500 rpms is what gave me my best time.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #26  
05-1947's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 10, 2005
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
13.5 @ 102mph (2100ft elevation)
mods in sig.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #27  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Welcome to the club, Tony!!

Curious though... how did you come up with the altitude-corrected time. The formulas I've seen would be more like 13.50's. Also, one of the two tracks here is at 1,450 feet (and the other is at basically sea level) and I typically see 1 to 2 tenths difference between the two.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 07:40 AM
  #28  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
I pulled it out of my butt

Someone posted a link in here somewhere with the correction factors, that's what I used. Truth be told I was surprised at that number too, seems like an awful lot for 1200 ft.

The main reason for my glee, was that everyone else with me was in the 14's and had problems with traction. Those Nitto's hook real well at the track (What's left of them) And as you well know are extremely dry air doesn't do us any favors either.

I'm gonna try running at night and see what the difference is. Better air and lower temps should bring that down a bit.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #29  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally posted by SixtySix@December 12, 2005, 6:43 AM
And as you well know are extremely dry air doesn't do us any favors either.

I'm gonna try running at night and see what the difference is. Better air and lower temps should bring that down a bit.
Yea, you should see an improvement at night. And dry air is actually a good thing!! That's one problem I get here at the Qualcomm track. Even though it is near sea level, it can also have a lot of moisture in the air at night. On those rare occasions when its both cool and dry (like once so far this year... haha), it makes a difference for sure!!
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #30  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Well too much of a good thing isn't neccesarily all that great. Nightime would be perfect here, a little more moisture, less temps, should make for some good runs.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #31  
mikem's Avatar
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
In the sig............
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #32  
Burke0011's Avatar
Big Falken Tires
 
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 1
R/T .247

60 ft 2.065

8.791 @ 81.19

13.633 @ 101.21


Auto on street tires
JLT CAI and DTP Predator tune

This was in the height of a blazing summer day too - now that it is colder here and I am running new tunes from Doug I am eager to see any difference in numbers.....
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #33  
rhoover2's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 12, 2004
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
It's in my sig.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 03:21 PM
  #34  
KungFuHamster's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
went to noproblemraceway a couple weeks back...my best pass was a 13.28@103 with a 2.002 60ft.

best mph that night was 104.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #35  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
New best 1/8-mile numbers:

1/6/06 - Qualcomm Stadium (1/8-mi temporary track)
Mods: C&L CAI, SCT XCal2 w/BamaChips Torq tune, LT headers, 4.10 gears, M/T Drag Radials (w/auto trans)

60' = 1.951
330' = not recorded
1/8 = 8.437
1/8mph = 82.72

[1/4-mi equiv ~13.10]
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 10:35 PM
  #36  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
14.73 @ 93mph K&N intake, sct2 91 tune from brenspeed. v6 manual trans.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2006 | 10:39 PM
  #37  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
and SixtySix, when i was at speedworld last week i couldnt get traction for nothing either. I couldnt even post a 14 second run. Was at firebird last night in the 03 cobra, and discovered it needed a clutch lol.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2006 | 06:46 AM
  #38  
Black3V's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 27, 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
13.098 @ 105 N/A----11.92 @ 114 on zex 125 shot
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #39  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Just curious . . . are you guys with stock gears in your '05/'06's shifting into 4th or holding 3rd through the traps in the 1/4?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #40  
spyder7724's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
last time out november: 13.08@ 103my mph was off due to not having it dyno tuned after i replaced the converter. base dyno(as that run was made) 267hp/273tq after tune 281hp/322tq all on a"mustang dyno". he picked me up 70+ ft.lbs. of torque at 3300rpm and the least gain was 14hp/40tq.
i think it should run some 12's now if only the tracks were open around here in MD!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.