GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Fays2 Watts Link is installed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 07:38 AM
  #21  
Torrence's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Robbieg
Does this replace the panhard bar? I don't see one in the installed pic.

Yes, it replaces the panhard bar.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #22  
GRAYPNY's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: December 12, 2004
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 5
From: NorCal
Be careful if you buy a Saleen unit. There was a recall for something.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 02:52 PM
  #23  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by max2000jp
I disagree with that. My car has a bunch of suspension mods and I've been driving a 335XI for the last day. The XI feels so much better than my Mustang. It's much more intuitive in the corners, which makes me more more confident in the inputs I am making.

I really hope Ford puts a IRS in the next gen Stang, so we can finally have a great handling street car.
Hey dude, you DO know that the BMW you were driving was an ALL-WHEEL-DRIVE model, right? That's what the "X" stands for in 335Xi. With AWD, it darn well better have handled better than a Mustang!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #24  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
Hey dude, you DO know that the BMW you were driving was an ALL-WHEEL-DRIVE model, right? That's what the "X" stands for in 335Xi. With AWD, it darn well better have handled better than a Mustang!
Yes, I do understand that it's AWD. I did state it was an XI BMW's system is rear biased until it senses slip. Anyways, like Graypny said comparing a BMW to a Mustang is an apples to oranges comparison. I am keeping my fingers crossed that Ford puts in IRS rear in the redesigned Stang in 2010/2011.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #25  
JedCranium's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 22, 2006
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by ryan1112
Is asking the weight an unacceptable question? Nice Roush by the way, the tail lights look sweet.

Also, it looks like rpmoutlet has this for $350. I wonder why it's so much cheaper there.
Humm the weight of the Roush wow your guess is as good as mine I never had the car weighed. I placed a link below to show you some of the mod I've done It might help to estimate for the weight. Someday I'll weight this thing

Jed










Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #26  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
I believe he was referring to the weight of the Watts link components. It does look nice tucked under there - any increase in NVH from the rear?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #27  
JedCranium's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 22, 2006
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
Originally Posted by hi5.0
I believe he was referring to the weight of the Watts link components. It does look nice tucked under there - any increase in NVH from the rear?
Ahh! not sure what the Saleen Watts link weighs my gues it's more than the Fays. Later this year JDM added a cross bar to to the Watts Link setup via a recall. It was found that under extreme conditions this cross bar was necessary. The re call installation was free at the Ford dealer and JDM was quick to remedy this problem for people that bought the WL system.

http://www.teamjdm.com/shop/product_...roducts_id=228


Bill



Last edited by JedCranium; Mar 24, 2008 at 09:33 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 11:25 AM
  #28  
ryan1112's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 738
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, OH
Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. It's cool that the dealer did the recall for free.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #29  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Torrence
It's a pretty heavy/hefty piece. Not sure on the exact weight though.
They all look to be a bunch of added unsprung weight. 30+ pounds maybe? This sort of number is substantial.

You could find out the shipping weight and remove 10% for packing. That would give you an approximate weight. I guess the big question is how much power do you need to compensate for the weight? Or, is the added unsprung weight worth the improved handling?

I think they're all great pieces, but I don't want to add weight; that doesn't make sense to me.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 02:19 PM
  #30  
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2007
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: West Chicago
Originally Posted by 05fordgt
With a starting price before any options of $40k, and reasonably equipped at $45k, it darn well better have handled better than a Mustang!
I paraphrased you!

I owned an '04 3.0i Z4 as a daily driver for 2 years and for being nearly $20k cheaper to my pocketbook, the stock Mustang GT is fantastically close in terms of ride and drive feel. The corners are what I want back though and am heartened to read this review of the Fey Watts Link - it's definitely going to be one of my first suspension mods.

Thanks for writing the review Torrence!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #31  
Torrence's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dixie_Flatline
I paraphrased you!

I owned an '04 3.0i Z4 as a daily driver for 2 years and for being nearly $20k cheaper to my pocketbook, the stock Mustang GT is fantastically close in terms of ride and drive feel. The corners are what I want back though and am heartened to read this review of the Fey Watts Link - it's definitely going to be one of my first suspension mods.

Thanks for writing the review Torrence!
My pleasure..... We owe it to each other to but the info out there, good or bad.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #32  
Torrence's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by WaltM
They all look to be a bunch of added unsprung weight. 30+ pounds maybe? This sort of number is substantial.

You could find out the shipping weight and remove 10% for packing. That would give you an approximate weight. I guess the big question is how much power do you need to compensate for the weight? Or, is the added unsprung weight worth the improved handling?

I think they're all great pieces, but I don't want to add weight; that doesn't make sense to me.
I hear ya about the extra weight.... thats' when you up the boost. lol
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #33  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by max2000jp
Yes, I do understand that it's AWD. I did state it was an XI BMW's system is rear biased until it senses slip. Anyways, like Graypny said comparing a BMW to a Mustang is an apples to oranges comparison. I am keeping my fingers crossed that Ford puts in IRS rear in the redesigned Stang in 2010/2011.
No worries dude, just didn't see anywhere that it was typed AWD. I for one, like the SRA on the car. When I punch it, no squatting, just going! If they do an IRS, it better be a GOOD system and not that crap the last gen Cobras had.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #34  
Torrence's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
The weight on the box that the piece came in says 33.6lbs
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #35  
Straightsix's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2008
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by max2000jp
I disagree with that. My car has a bunch of suspension mods and I've been driving a 335XI for the last day. The XI feels so much better than my Mustang. It's much more intuitive in the corners, which makes me more more confident in the inputs I am making.

I really hope Ford puts a IRS in the next gen Stang, so we can finally have a great handling street car.
I would disagree with you. I have owned and/or daily driven two BMWs (a highly modified 1990 525i and a 2004 330ci Sport Package) and my Mustang blows them out of the water in terms of handling feel and capability. This is in addition to the fact that I have driven pretty extensively just about every late model BMW in existance (I used to work at a dealership).

Of course, my Mustang is pretty highly modified and stock to stock BMWs do handle better by a significant margin, but when modified, these Mustangs can be pretty sharp.

I would think that a Watts link like this one would probably make it even better...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #36  
Torrence's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Straightsix
I would disagree with you. I have owned and/or daily driven two BMWs (a highly modified 1990 525i and a 2004 330ci Sport Package) and my Mustang blows them out of the water in terms of handling feel and capability. This is in addition to the fact that I have driven pretty extensively just about every late model BMW in existance (I used to work at a dealership).

Of course, my Mustang is pretty highly modified and stock to stock BMWs do handle better by a significant margin, but when modified, these Mustangs can be pretty sharp.

I would think that a Watts link like this one would probably make it even better...
Thank You!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 05:37 AM
  #37  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
My Crown Vic has a factory watt's linkage rear suspension. I compared it with a 92-97 Vic with the standard 4-bar link (similar to 79-04 non-IRS Mustang rear suspension) and the Watt's Linkage is quite superior. However, the car has a tendency to wag its a$$ over rough roads (like potholes) and has a VERY weird tendency to wig-wag on steel mesh bridges with the stock shock dampeners.

The S197's 4-bar / panhard setup is quite interesting and I haven't had any problems with it. According to Car and Driver, the Marauder was rated at 0.86G roadholding while the S197 GT was only rated at 0.84G (Mazda3 was at 0.85G) so there is definitely room for improvement. I know for a fact my Crown Vic does not handle as well as my Stang.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 03:21 AM
  #38  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by Torrence
The weight on the box that the piece came in says 33.6lbs
hmm, guess it means having to upgrade to lighter components in other areas to compensate! may want to try this on the Fox...
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 06:05 AM
  #39  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
It's not a total lost cause... You could move the battery to the back of the car and improve the weight distribution.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 05:25 AM
  #40  
AFBLUE's Avatar
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 2
Hey Torrence,

Can you elaborate more on the change in ride quality compared to the stock Shelby GT? Does the watts link make the SGT stiffer/firmer than it already is?
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:02 PM.