GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Educate me on superchargers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #21  
05 Mustang's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 14, 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Canton, Georgia
according to my car's computer, @ 65mph I'm getting 27.7mpg and @ 85mph I'm getting 25.5
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #22  
uberPony's Avatar
 
Joined: January 20, 2006
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Here is my KB twin-screw

Reply
Old Dec 1, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #23  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by metroplex
You make a good point, but your low-end air transfer function has to be totally out of whack to make that big of a MPG difference.

As for rear gears, they do have a huge impact on MPG. The 2000 Crown Vic in base form got 2.73s and could get 25 MPG on the highway, while those that got 3.55s were rated for 21 MPG on the highway. At 80 MPH, the 4.6 runs at 2100 RPM w/ 2.73s, 2700 RPM w/ 3.55s and 3300 RPM w/ 4.30s

In the 07 GT, at 80 MPH the engine runs at 2500 RPM w/ 3.55s and about 2900 RPM w/ 4.10s (using base 17" tires).

Our freeways are limited at 70 MPH so the average traffic speed is about 80 MPH. I can only get near 25 MPG by driving 55-60 MPH, well below the speed limit and I suspect many of the hypermiling Mustang owners drive at 55-65 MPH and not the 70+ so the engine RPMs stay low with 4.10s or 4.30s
To your point, I only get about 20 mpg at 75 mph. That's due more to the bad aerodynamics of the S197 than to the gearing itself. My Mach 1 was much more aerodynamic, and didn't suffer as big a loss as highway speeds increased.

Our freeways here range in speed limits of 60 mph to 75 mph, depending on how close to major cities they are. I only offered up the 60 mph cruise control #'s as an example that I've tried for curiousity. My actual driving tends to be in the upper 5th percentile of speed (read: over the limit).

Around town, I get horrible mileage (about 12-13 mpg), but that was happening before the supercharger. My 4800 rpm stall converter always keeps the car revving a lot higher than stock anytime I'm driving around town (especially from a stop). On the highway, the big stall converter is not an issue, as it's a lock-up converter that's programmed to lock-up in 3rd, 4th, and 5th gears 1 second after getting into each gear (even at WOT, tuned that way for more acceleration at the end of the 1/4 mile dragstrip). Incedentally, a stock converter is only programmed to lock-up in 4th and 5th gear from the factory, so having 3rd do it, as well, helps a little in the power & economy realm.

Last edited by Five Oh Brian; Dec 1, 2008 at 05:19 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #24  
Rebel73's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
I have noticed NO significant change in my MPG after the Whipple install. The single greatest factor in determining mileage, IMHO, is the weight of the driver's foot.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #25  
Doogie's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 15, 2008
Posts: 1,373
Likes: 0
From: Brew City
Originally Posted by Rebel73
I have noticed NO significant change in my MPG after the Whipple install. The single greatest factor in determining mileage, IMHO, is the weight of the driver's foot.
Well that is refreshing to hear and re-enforces my decision to get "blown"!! Lots of power waiting to be unleashed under the hood, but still a car that is not going to kill you with gas consumption.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #26  
Ronith's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: November 18, 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by uberPony
Here is my KB twin-screw

How much did that set you back?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #27  
Enfynet's Avatar
 
Joined: August 19, 2004
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 3
From: Cleveland
I think the reason some people aren't seeing a huge mileage difference is that before you had to push the pedal more to get the same driving result. aka, the car goes with less effort - therefore less leadfoot required for a good time.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:15 AM
  #28  
uberPony's Avatar
 
Joined: January 20, 2006
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
How much did that set you back?
I paid 6400 I think for the polished kit.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #29  
adrenalin's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 2
moved to the performance mods section
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #30  
jpajamas's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 2, 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
I just bought my Whipple from the US, and got real lucky with a good deal. install scheduled for January, and can't really give'r until MAY (I'm in Niagara, storing the beast for the winter)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rando
2010-2014 Mustang
8
Aug 25, 2021 11:12 AM
Mr. V
5.0L GT Modifications
17
Nov 22, 2015 06:31 PM
HMR-TYM
5.0L GT Modifications
19
Jul 31, 2015 10:39 AM
wifewantedaGT
Off-Topic Chatter
6
Aug 22, 2005 06:11 PM
TMSBrad
Southeast
3
Feb 2, 2005 05:24 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.