GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Dyno pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/14/08, 09:19 AM
  #21  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you think the previous owner could have left a tune in the car?
Old 3/15/08, 08:01 AM
  #22  
Mach 1 Member
 
anthony05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My son's '05 had a tune left in his car when he bought it. He had to take it to the dealer for a reflash.

Like I told you on another forum my experience with Dyno Dynamics dyno was the same. Way high #'s. 15% on hp and 10.5% on tq compared to SAE corrected Dynojet runs.
Old 3/15/08, 11:58 AM
  #23  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I talked to a few people about JBA, the shop that uses the dyno dynamics. JBA does not get the warmest receptions. Their dyno numbers do seem to be high, but in my case the difference was about 4% compared to 10 or more that other people were getting.
Old 3/15/08, 06:06 PM
  #24  
Former Vendor
 
TillmanSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 11, 2007
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your car is obviously between 280-284 hp and 287 tq then. That's good numbers even for just a tune on a stock car. Both runs were SAE and Dynojet numbers, so that doesn't lie. Possible the car could still house a tune. Dyno dynamics is junk. Sorry to offend anyone, I'd own a Superflow before that!

CR
Old 3/15/08, 11:56 PM
  #25  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps a dumb question, but would disconnecting the battery for 20-30 min reflash the computer? About two weeks ago I disconnected the battery for about 30 min.
I guess if you pay $95 for a dyno pull on a dyno dynamics, you will get high numbers. Inflated prices, inflated dyno numbers. But I guess the free dyno on the dyno jet somewhat makes up for it.

Last edited by gmantheman; 3/15/08 at 11:59 PM.
Old 3/16/08, 11:00 PM
  #26  
Mach 1 Member
 
anthony05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disconnecting the battery won't reflash or reset the pcm at all. It actually has to rewrite the program.
Old 3/17/08, 08:34 AM
  #27  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Anthony, I may bring to the dealer and see if a tune was left in the car. If so I may have them reflash the pcm, or maybe not.
Old 3/20/08, 07:21 PM
  #28  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bought the car in for the recall. I also had them check for a tune. They ran a diagnostic and everything checked out fine. No tune was found.
Old 3/21/08, 09:19 PM
  #29  
Member
 
cdavila's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 19, 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i had mine tuned on a dynojet with sae correction and with only a Mac axleback i got 269 hp and 289 torque.
Old 3/21/08, 10:56 PM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdavila
i had mine tuned on a dynojet with sae correction and with only a Mac axleback i got 269 hp and 289 torque.
From what I have read, 269 is on the high end of a stock mustang. Your torque numbers look really good. My hp numbers are good, but I wonder if my torque numbers a little low compared to my horsepower?
Old 3/23/08, 11:53 AM
  #31  
Member
 
HateBreeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 12, 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I have the same problem! thats if its a problem or factory freak!

I returned my stock CAI+Tune to dyno this on a Dynojet..

My dyno run on my Stock GT (Auto)+SLP LM were:
1-First run=Max Power=279.70 T=287.96
2-P=292.21 T=286.23
3-P=293.9 T=290.57

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YuEic6P1qtk

Last edited by HateBreeder; 3/23/08 at 11:56 AM.
Old 3/23/08, 05:36 PM
  #32  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are good numbers for Stock. Are you going to install a CAI/Tune?
Old 3/24/08, 07:03 AM
  #33  
Member
 
HateBreeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 12, 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes I will ,I have a Steeda CAI+tune ,& I'm ordering more mods ..Thats why I dyno'ed my stock to use it as a benchmark for future mods..

Some one told me that a dyno operator can easily fudge the rear wheel figures to make them higher than they should be simply by inputting higher ambient temp. and lower barometric pressure values into the dyno!..


Last edited by HateBreeder; 3/24/08 at 07:05 AM.
Old 3/24/08, 08:48 AM
  #34  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
gmantheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depending on the Dyonjet, they can be different. If I recall from reading the Ford Parts catalog, one dyno has an ambient temp. of 60 degrees and another has an ambient of 77 degrees. Supposedly when ford test their CAI/Tuner combo used in the Shelby, they used the higer ambient temp hence an increase of 20 hp vs 25-35 claimied by others.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
64
7/21/16 09:14 AM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
10/2/15 01:00 PM
PonyMuscletang13
Repair and Service Help
11
9/26/15 02:33 PM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
9/17/15 10:24 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
9/3/15 10:50 AM



Quick Reply: Dyno pull



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM.