GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Dyno pull

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 09:19 AM
  #21  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Do you think the previous owner could have left a tune in the car?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 08:01 AM
  #22  
anthony05gt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
My son's '05 had a tune left in his car when he bought it. He had to take it to the dealer for a reflash.

Like I told you on another forum my experience with Dyno Dynamics dyno was the same. Way high #'s. 15% on hp and 10.5% on tq compared to SAE corrected Dynojet runs.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 11:58 AM
  #23  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
I talked to a few people about JBA, the shop that uses the dyno dynamics. JBA does not get the warmest receptions. Their dyno numbers do seem to be high, but in my case the difference was about 4% compared to 10 or more that other people were getting.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #24  
TillmanSpeed's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: January 11, 2007
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Aston, PA
Your car is obviously between 280-284 hp and 287 tq then. That's good numbers even for just a tune on a stock car. Both runs were SAE and Dynojet numbers, so that doesn't lie. Possible the car could still house a tune. Dyno dynamics is junk. Sorry to offend anyone, I'd own a Superflow before that!

CR
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 11:56 PM
  #25  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Perhaps a dumb question, but would disconnecting the battery for 20-30 min reflash the computer? About two weeks ago I disconnected the battery for about 30 min.
I guess if you pay $95 for a dyno pull on a dyno dynamics, you will get high numbers. Inflated prices, inflated dyno numbers. But I guess the free dyno on the dyno jet somewhat makes up for it.

Last edited by gmantheman; Mar 15, 2008 at 11:59 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #26  
anthony05gt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Disconnecting the battery won't reflash or reset the pcm at all. It actually has to rewrite the program.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2008 | 08:34 AM
  #27  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Thanks Anthony, I may bring to the dealer and see if a tune was left in the car. If so I may have them reflash the pcm, or maybe not.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #28  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
I bought the car in for the recall. I also had them check for a tune. They ran a diagnostic and everything checked out fine. No tune was found.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #29  
cdavila's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 19, 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
i had mine tuned on a dynojet with sae correction and with only a Mac axleback i got 269 hp and 289 torque.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #30  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Originally Posted by cdavila
i had mine tuned on a dynojet with sae correction and with only a Mac axleback i got 269 hp and 289 torque.
From what I have read, 269 is on the high end of a stock mustang. Your torque numbers look really good. My hp numbers are good, but I wonder if my torque numbers a little low compared to my horsepower?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 11:53 AM
  #31  
HateBreeder's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 12, 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
I think I have the same problem! thats if its a problem or factory freak!

I returned my stock CAI+Tune to dyno this on a Dynojet..

My dyno run on my Stock GT (Auto)+SLP LM were:
1-First run=Max Power=279.70 T=287.96
2-P=292.21 T=286.23
3-P=293.9 T=290.57

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YuEic6P1qtk

Last edited by HateBreeder; Mar 23, 2008 at 11:56 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2008 | 05:36 PM
  #32  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Those are good numbers for Stock. Are you going to install a CAI/Tune?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #33  
HateBreeder's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 12, 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Yes I will ,I have a Steeda CAI+tune ,& I'm ordering more mods ..Thats why I dyno'ed my stock to use it as a benchmark for future mods..

Some one told me that a dyno operator can easily fudge the rear wheel figures to make them higher than they should be simply by inputting higher ambient temp. and lower barometric pressure values into the dyno!..


Last edited by HateBreeder; Mar 24, 2008 at 07:05 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2008 | 08:48 AM
  #34  
gmantheman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 26, 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Depending on the Dyonjet, they can be different. If I recall from reading the Ford Parts catalog, one dyno has an ambient temp. of 60 degrees and another has an ambient of 77 degrees. Supposedly when ford test their CAI/Tuner combo used in the Shelby, they used the higer ambient temp hence an increase of 20 hp vs 25-35 claimied by others.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
PonyMuscletang13
Repair and Service Help
11
Sep 26, 2015 02:33 PM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:24 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.