GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

400RWHP N/A is it possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/21/06, 07:51 PM
  #41  
Cobra Member
 
Cleveland's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 20, 2005
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by racerx
How about 384 RWHP N/A ...close enough? That's the highest I've seen so far. http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...d.php?t=221006
You should remove the memory of that post cause thats just a BBR claim. Thats what started them on their slippery slope.

-Dan
Old 7/21/06, 08:16 PM
  #42  
 
169stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AnotherMustangMan
Where in the orignal post did the guy ask about anything other than achieving 400hp? Oh, nowhere. Sure Sodaman was being a smart***, but he answered the guys question correctly enough.
Yea, I guess he didn't clarify whether he wanted it streetable or a trailer queen. How many guys do you know on this site that are looking for a trailered car. They wouldn't be asking questions here if it was a trailered car. If it puts down 400rwhp, it'll be a trailered car. I for some reason, am doubting we'll see 400rwhp N/A anytime in the near future! It's gonna take A LOT more than a couple cam options from one manufacturer and a unmodified stock block.
I don't suggest referring to anything related to BBR's claims. They lost all credibility awhile ago! 384rwhp still isn't 400rwhp!
Old 7/21/06, 08:36 PM
  #43  
 
don_w's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 169stang
I don't suggest referring to anything related to BBR's claims. They lost all credibility awhile ago! 384rwhp still isn't 400rwhp!
+1,000,000!!! Any posts about BBR and JohnnyZ are a waste of bandwidth.

Oh, and in their case, 384rwhp isn't 384rwhp... lol
Old 7/21/06, 08:56 PM
  #44  
Cam Tease
 
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hahaha, the adorable antics of the good ol' JohnnyZ...
Old 7/21/06, 09:32 PM
  #45  
Mach 1 Member
 
racerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 8, 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ooops! I guess I should have read all the way through that SVT thread...yeah, forget I mentioned it

Originally Posted by Cleveland
You should remove the memory of that post cause thats just a BBR claim. Thats what started them on their slippery slope.

-Dan
Old 7/21/06, 11:02 PM
  #46  
Cobra R Member
 
sodaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 12, 2004
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wasnt trying to be a smartxxx, and who said the block would be stock. I thought this was posting in regards to a 4.6l being able to be built to get 400 hp, yes you have to modify quite a lot, but If you got money you can do it plain and simple. I dont understand why people dont think it can be done. But why would you. If you got that much money, buy a different engine, supercharge it, turbo, whatever, but yes it can be done. My last posting on the subject, since some think I am trying to be coy. Just speaking from experience and actually building engines. Not having someone else do it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim74656
SN95 Mustang
8
5/1/23 02:15 AM
JTB
Motorsports
0
9/7/15 10:20 PM
Cleveland
GT Performance Mods
3
7/8/06 10:59 PM
rja6214
Fox Mustangs
4
1/29/06 11:47 AM
Import-Slaya
GT Performance Mods
5
6/27/05 12:16 PM



Quick Reply: 400RWHP N/A is it possible?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:23 PM.