400RWHP N/A is it possible?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 21, 2006 | 07:51 PM

#41

Cleveland

Cobra Member

Joined: February 20, 2005

Posts: 1,292

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by racerx

How about 384 RWHP N/A ...close enough? That's the highest I've seen so far. http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...d.php?t=221006

You should remove the memory of that post cause thats just a BBR claim. Thats what started them on their slippery slope.

-Dan

Jul 21, 2006 | 08:16 PM

#42

169stang

Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: July 12, 2004

Posts: 2,260

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnotherMustangMan

Where in the orignal post did the guy ask about anything other than achieving 400hp? Oh, nowhere. Sure Sodaman was being a smart***, but he answered the guys question correctly enough.

Yea, I guess he didn't clarify whether he wanted it streetable or a trailer queen. How many guys do you know on this site that are looking for a trailered car. They wouldn't be asking questions here if it was a trailered car. If it puts down 400rwhp, it'll be a trailered car. I for some reason, am doubting we'll see 400rwhp N/A anytime in the near future! It's gonna take A LOT more than a couple cam options from one manufacturer and a unmodified stock block.
I don't suggest referring to anything related to BBR's claims. They lost all credibility awhile ago! 384rwhp still isn't 400rwhp!

Jul 21, 2006 | 08:36 PM

#43

don_w

6th Fastest 05+ 1/4mi Time On TMS

Joined: June 21, 2005

Posts: 4,276

Likes: 1

Quote:

Originally Posted by 169stang

I don't suggest referring to anything related to BBR's claims. They lost all credibility awhile ago! 384rwhp still isn't 400rwhp!

+1,000,000!!! Any posts about BBR and JohnnyZ are a waste of bandwidth.

Oh, and in their case, 384rwhp isn't 384rwhp... lol

Jul 21, 2006 | 08:56 PM

#44

AnotherMustangMan

Cam Tease

Joined: September 30, 2004

Posts: 1,378

Likes: 0

Hahaha, the adorable antics of the good ol' JohnnyZ...

Jul 21, 2006 | 09:32 PM

#45

racerx

Mach 1 Member

Joined: June 8, 2004

Posts: 528

Likes: 0

Ooops!

I guess I should have read all the way through that SVT thread...yeah, forget I mentioned it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cleveland

You should remove the memory of that post cause thats just a BBR claim. Thats what started them on their slippery slope.

-Dan

Jul 21, 2006 | 11:02 PM

#46

sodaman

Cobra R Member

Joined: November 12, 2004

Posts: 1,914

Likes: 0

wasnt trying to be a smartxxx, and who said the block would be stock. I thought this was posting in regards to a 4.6l being able to be built to get 400 hp, yes you have to modify quite a lot, but If you got money you can do it plain and simple. I dont understand why people dont think it can be done. But why would you. If you got that much money, buy a different engine, supercharge it, turbo, whatever, but yes it can be done. My last posting on the subject, since some think I am trying to be coy. Just speaking from experience and actually building engines. Not having someone else do it.