Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

GT vs Bullitt Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 06:38 PM
  #81  
Black GT500's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2008
Posts: 721
Likes: 4
From: Pacific NW USA
Obviously you wouldn't know performance if you tripped over it...

For your edification...

Originally Posted by TXBLUOVAL
Good philosophy IMO but mostly because I don't believe in anything but subtle mods on a serialized car. If they would've offered the Navigator 5.4 as an option there would really be no reason to mod the engine to the extreme that the 4.6 needs in order to really run hard enough to live up the legend left by the 68.

The original 1968 Mustang GT 390 boasted a 0-60 time of 7.8 seconds and a quarter-mile time of 15.2 seconds at 94.0 mph, according to Motor Trend. Now: Ford engineers modified the 2008 Mustang Bullitt’s chassis and suspension to fine-tune handling and ensure the extra horsepower and torque from the 4.6-liter V-8 is put to good use. Motor Trend clocks the 2008 Ford Mustang Bullitt at 5 seconds even for 0-60, with a quarter-mile time of 13.7 seconds at 102.7 mph.

Obviously you wouldn't know performance if you tripped over it...


Originally Posted by TXBLUOVAL
I agree with you on this one ... I just dont think the looks (for the BULLITT anyway) are cheesy. The appearance is PERFECT FOR THE BULLITT. I feel the "cheesy" part does apply to the lack of performance and lack of traditional Mustang-style options.

Folks can have the NAV system and SIRIUS radio ... I want a CAR !!!

As for the GT/CS vs BULLITT ... One package is bling-oriented and the other is theme-oriented (notice I stop short of saying "performance-oriented") ... total buyer-preference here and because of this the BULLITT package should not cost any more over a GT than the GT/CS upgrade package does. I think both packages are comparable in offerings although very different with what is offered, therefore should be comparable in cost (with the BULLITT being the one that is currently the overpriced of the two).

Just my opinion anyway ...

Last edited by Black GT500; Apr 5, 2008 at 06:47 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #82  
MrClean's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Martimus
The fundamental benefit of the Bullitt is that it contains numerous suspension and performance upgrades AND is covered completely under the factory warranty.

If you remove the following:
- Bullitt faux gas cap
- Turned metal dash
- My Color instrument cluster with crosshairs
- FRPP Suspension upgrades
- FRPP Cold Air Intake with custom tune
- Bullitt Strut Tower brace
- Bullitt front grille
- GT500 seats and steering wheel
- Brake upgrades
- Totally awesome Highland Green paint job
- 3.73 gears

and replace them with the equivalent Mustang GT parts what you're left with is a Mustang GT Premium. Per Ford the Bullitt's horsepower comes in somewhere around 315... the Mustang GT is slightly less. From a cost standpoint the cost of the Bullitt is pretty well in line with a well equipped GT/CS. Of course some of us were lucky enough to buy ours for less than MSRP so its really just a couple thousand dollars more than the cost of a Mustang GT.



Comparing the Bullitt to a Shelby is doing the car a dis-service! The Shelby GT, for example, starts is life as a Mustang GT and is then shipped to Shelby in Lost Wages where its retrofitted with many of the same mods as the Bullitt... and a few unique to the Shelby GT. An example of which is the dash plaque with Carroll Shelby's signature on it. That plaque alone jacks the price up on the Shelby a couple grand!
I'd rather get the "bling" GT/CS (which I did), and add the perfomance mods that go beyond the subtle factory mods of the Bullit (which I also did). With the stock airbox, stock timing, and just slightly leaner AFR, my car dynoed 285 rwhp/304rwtq...that translates to 335/357 flywheel (just installed tha AirAid, and getting retuned next week...will post dyno results). The 4.10's are also a more aggressive mod that the 3.73...I mean, the stocker comes with 3.55's, why even bother with 3.73's? As for the suspension, the mild mod is just that: mild. When I do mine I'm doing the Roush, which instead of lowering the car 6 millimeters (25 mm to an inch, so that's a ¼" lower than stock), lowers tha car a full inch with mated sway bars and shocks/struts (read last month's Motor Trend for an objective comparo: not as extreme as the SGT, which "got unsettled by mid-corner bumps" but a whole lot better than the stocker). Oh and the Bullit (and GT500, and SGT, and Roush 427's, and Saleen's [except for the HE and PJ editions]) still comes with the same too-long panhard bar that makes the driver rear tire stick out 3/8" more than the passenger's (also something I already fixed) Exhaust sound? I've got FRPP stingers, nuff said. The dash? mine came with the charcoal aluminum dash... HID on 08's? I put the SilverStar ultrawhites in and can honestly say they're comparable to the HID's Ive seen, which in Ford giuse are a far cry from the projector lamps in the German machines. So what will I end up with? A GT that looks cool (GT/CS), with better handling/performance than the Bullit for the same coin (paid $27k for mine). As for the brakes, the list of upgrades, as reported by objective 3rd parties I've seen, doesn't list any difference between the stocker GT or Bulllit Brakes.

Originally Posted by superfly s197
Well, I guess I have to jump into this.

What's with all the gt/cs hate. I went this route FOR the looks (I get compliments all the time ). IMO, this was a better choice for me. The Gt/Cs had everything I was looking for - in terms of looks - with a few minor details to make it mine. From here, I can make it perform the way I want. aka Bullit- killer

The Bullit is great. Do not get me wrong. I really think this is one solid mustang. My neighbor was really close to purchasing one and I was right rooting him on. To compare the two is like comparing (here comes the cliche) apples to oranges. They please different crowds. The Bullit is more performance oriented while the gt/cs has focus on looks. What I have noticed is most "Bullitheads" tend to think they have the greatest machine out there.

1 Bullit - love what you're doing to your Bullit
+1

Originally Posted by DW Rutledge
IMO the Bullitt is the worst of the SEs.

The styling

Why would I want a car with the name of a 30 year old movie on it? Why not a "Jaws" edition or a "Star Wars" edition. I love the movie, I appreciate the significance, I own the movie, but I don't want "Bullitt" all over my car, e.g. the fake gas cap and the steering wheel.

The dash panel is FUGLY IMO.

The DHG paint is cool.

The grille looks "okay" but I'd rather have the foglights honestly.

The mods

Same old argument - just mod a GT.

I prefer my JLT2/Bama tune to the Ford intake/tune on the Bullitt.

It's debatable whether a STB even helps on these cars, I've seen arguments both ways on this board.

I'll give you the GT500 seats, the 3.73s, and the brake upgrades.

For my money I'd rather have my Premium GT and mod it myself than a Bullitt with a few nice upgrades and a bunch of crap I don't want that frankly looks cheesy to me. just my opinion.
What he said.

Not bashing the Bullit; it is what it is....a mildly modded GT

Last edited by MrClean; Apr 5, 2008 at 07:23 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #83  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Martimus
The fundamental benefit of the Bullitt is that it contains numerous suspension and performance upgrades AND is covered completely under the factory warranty.

If you remove the following:
- Bullitt faux gas cap
- Turned metal dash
- My Color instrument cluster with crosshairs
- FRPP Suspension upgrades
- FRPP Cold Air Intake with custom tune
- Bullitt Strut Tower brace
- Bullitt front grille
- GT500 seats and steering wheel
- Brake upgrades
- Totally awesome Highland Green paint job
- 3.73 gears

and replace them with the equivalent Mustang GT parts what you're left with is a Mustang GT Premium. Per Ford the Bullitt's horsepower comes in somewhere around 315... the Mustang GT is slightly less. From a cost standpoint the cost of the Bullitt is pretty well in line with a well equipped GT/CS. Of course some of us were lucky enough to buy ours for less than MSRP so its really just a couple thousand dollars more than the cost of a Mustang GT.



Comparing the Bullitt to a Shelby is doing the car a dis-service! The Shelby GT, for example, starts is life as a Mustang GT and is then shipped to Shelby in Lost Wages where its retrofitted with many of the same mods as the Bullitt... and a few unique to the Shelby GT. An example of which is the dash plaque with Carroll Shelby's signature on it. That plaque alone jacks the price up on the Shelby a couple grand!
In your list you are forgetting the engine front dampener, the multi octane capability, the entire exhaust system, and that the 3.73 gears aren't just the run of the mill Ford or FRPP pieces and the rear assembly is the same used in the Shelby GT500 KR.

The price, especially now with the incentives offered really is a bargain.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 08:15 PM
  #84  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MrClean
I'd rather get the "bling" GT/CS (which I did), and add the perfomance mods that go beyond the subtle factory mods of the Bullit (which I also did). With the stock airbox, stock timing, and just slightly leaner AFR, my car dynoed 285 rwhp/304rwtq...that translates to 335/357 flywheel (just installed tha AirAid, and getting retuned next week...will post dyno results). The 4.10's are also a more aggressive mod that the 3.73...I mean, the stocker comes with 3.55's, why even bother with 3.73's? As for the suspension, the mild mod is just that: mild. When I do mine I'm doing the Roush, which instead of lowering the car 6 millimeters (25 mm to an inch, so that's a ¼" lower than stock), lowers tha car a full inch with mated sway bars and shocks/struts (read last month's Motor Trend for an objective comparo: not as extreme as the SGT, which "got unsettled by mid-corner bumps" but a whole lot better than the stocker). Oh and the Bullit (and GT500, and SGT, and Roush 427's, and Saleen's [except for the HE and PJ editions]) still comes with the same too-long panhard bar that makes the driver rear tire stick out 3/8" more than the passenger's (also something I already fixed) Exhaust sound? I've got FRPP stingers, nuff said. The dash? mine came with the charcoal aluminum dash... HID on 08's? I put the SilverStar ultrawhites in and can honestly say they're comparable to the HID's Ive seen, which in Ford giuse are a far cry from the projector lamps in the German machines. So what will I end up with? A GT that looks cool (GT/CS), with better handling/performance than the Bullit for the same coin (paid $27k for mine). As for the brakes, the list of upgrades, as reported by objective 3rd parties I've seen, doesn't list any difference between the stocker GT or Bulllit Brakes.



+1


What he said.

Not bashing the Bullit; it is what it is....a mildly modded GT
"A GT that looks cool (GT/CS), with better handling/performance than the Bullit for the same coin"

You're fooling yourself.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #85  
Martimus's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2005
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 1
From: 'neath a cactus
Originally Posted by MrClean
A GT that looks cool (GT/CS), with better handling/performance than the Bullit for the same coin (paid $27k for mine). As for the brakes, the list of upgrades, as reported by objective 3rd parties I've seen, doesn't list any difference between the stocker GT or Bulllit Brakes.
If you're happy with the ride then . Only one minor thing I'm gonna throw back at you. You said that you paid $27K for yours. Wanna guess what I paid for my Bullitt? You have three guesses and none of them can be at or over MSRP!!!

Go enjoy your Mustang! I'm sure as heck enjoying mine!!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #86  
Martimus's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2005
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 1
From: 'neath a cactus
Originally Posted by RCSignals
In your list you are forgetting the engine front dampener, the multi octane capability, the entire exhaust system, and that the 3.73 gears aren't just the run of the mill Ford or FRPP pieces and the rear assembly is the same used in the Shelby GT500 KR.
Yea... some days I'd forget my head if it wasn't attached to my neck! Know what else I forgot? GT500 pedals!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #87  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
What was up with that TXBLUOVAL guy? He just wouldn't let it go. He would probably argue with a wall.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #88  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Martimus
Yea... some days I'd forget my head if it wasn't attached to my neck! Know what else I forgot? GT500 pedals!
Yes I forgot to mention those as well.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #89  
MrClean's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Martimus, I bet your '05 handles better than the Bullit, with comparable performance. As far as "octane detection" all the PCM does is detect knock, and adjust the timing accordingly, which all the S197 GT's do, so I don't know what's "new" about that. In fact, I feel strongly that that was a carefully crafted line of bull, touting a feature the S197 GT's already had as "new".

I like the front and rear fascias, as well as the side scoops, on your '05......
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #90  
LEO_06GT's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 24, 2006
Posts: 7,409
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Metroplex, Shelby GT500 let's just agree to disagree.

I've never seen such intense arguing over some @#$%in lights.





Edit:Wow you can say "@#$%ing" now?

Last edited by AFBLUE; Apr 6, 2008 at 12:47 PM. Reason: F-Word filter has failed. Please don't abuse this loop hole
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #91  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MrClean
Martimus, I bet your '05 handles better than the Bullit, with comparable performance. As far as "octane detection" all the PCM does is detect knock, and adjust the timing accordingly, which all the S197 GT's do, so I don't know what's "new" about that. In fact, I feel strongly that that was a carefully crafted line of bull, touting a feature the S197 GT's already had as "new".

I like the front and rear fascias, as well as the side scoops, on your '05......
You really need to educate yourself more on all this
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #92  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
No George thats the second time I've done that.

TXBLUOVAL,

It would be easier to convert Osama to catholicism than to convince a Bullitthead that there car isn't the greatest car ever to come off an assembly line.

Gary
you mean It would be easier to convert Osama to catholicism than to convince a CS/GT owner that there car isn't the greatest car ever to come off an assembly line.


Those are who the argument is all coming from about car superiority.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 12:58 AM
  #93  
Martimus's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2005
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 1
From: 'neath a cactus
Originally Posted by MrClean
Martimus, I bet your '05 handles better than the Bullit, with comparable performance. As far as "octane detection" all the PCM does is detect knock, and adjust the timing accordingly, which all the S197 GT's do, so I don't know what's "new" about that. In fact, I feel strongly that that was a carefully crafted line of bull, touting a feature the S197 GT's already had as "new".
So you're betting that an 05 V6 Mustang handles better than a Bullitt?? Gee... I loved that car no doubt but you are sooooooo wrong!! Thanks MrClean!! I needed a good laugh...

For what its worth MrClean the S197 owners manual indicates that Mustangs from the factory were tuned to run on 87 octane. The 08 Bullitt, on the other hand, can run on 87 or 91+ octane...

The following is from page 258 of the 2008 Mustang owners manual:
Originally Posted by Mustang Owners Manual
Octane recommendations

Your vehicle is designed to use “Regular” unleaded gasoline with pump (R+M)/2 octane rating of 87. We do not recommend the use of gasolines labeled as “Regular” that are sold with octane ratings of 86 or lower in high altitude areas. Do not be concerned if your engine sometimes knocks lightly. However, if it knocks heavily under most driving conditions while you are using fuel with the recommended octane rating, see your authorized dealer to prevent any engine damage.

Octane recommendations (Bullitt™* Mustang only)

Your vehicle will run normally on 87 octane regular fuel without damaging the engine, but premium fuel with an octane rating of 91 (R+M)/2 or higher is recommended for best overall performance. * ™ & Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (s07)

Last edited by Martimus; Apr 6, 2008 at 01:08 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #94  
Martimus's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2005
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 1
From: 'neath a cactus
Originally Posted by RCSignals
you mean It would be easier to convert Osama to catholicism than to convince a CS/GT owner that there car isn't the greatest car ever to come off an assembly line.


Those are who the argument is all coming from about car superiority.
+1! Seems to me its the GT/CS owners who see fit to tell us that our Bullitts are inferior... and then blame us for starting the bickering.

2k7gtcs: Mr. President... Is that you??

I personally like the GT/CS's... I'd never own one but thats cuz all the scoops are just too "over the top" for me.

Last edited by Martimus; Apr 6, 2008 at 01:06 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 01:58 AM
  #95  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Martimus
+1! Seems to me its the GT/CS owners who see fit to tell us that our Bullitts are inferior... and then blame us for starting the bickering.

2k7gtcs: Mr. President... Is that you??

I personally like the GT/CS's... I'd never own one but thats cuz all the scoops are just too "over the top" for me.
Interesting phenomenon isn't it.

Oh well I like my Dark Green V6 Mustang
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #96  
MrClean's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Martimus
So you're betting that an 05 V6 Mustang handles better than a Bullitt?? Gee... I loved that car no doubt but you are sooooooo wrong!! Thanks MrClean!! I needed a good laugh...

For what its worth MrClean the S197 owners manual indicates that Mustangs from the factory were tuned to run on 87 octane. The 08 Bullitt, on the other hand, can run on 87 or 91+ octane...

The following is from page 258 of the 2008 Mustang owners manual:
I didn't realize your '05 was a V6, and in that case, I was clearly wrong makinfg that statement. It is interesting, however, that you bash the GT/CS and yet the very mods (visual) that make it such are the ones you made to your V6....

As to the 87 octane, I think it is you that needs a little more education on the tuning and mechanical aspects of these cars. The 87 rating for non-Bullit S197 GT's is a minimum rating, as you might discern from the context of the excerpt you quoted from the manual.

Octane detection would amount to a lab under the hood. The most advanced system do date in this respect is the new BMW M3's engine, that uses changes in the ignition systems induction to detect pre-ignition before it happens, but that is not the level of sophistication or complexity found in out Ford engines. The self adjusting timing on the Bullit (and other S197 GT's is a reaction of -preignition.

The fact is that the all the S197 GT's PCM's (Sapnish Oak) have multiple timing maps, and will use the most aggressive map as long as there is no pre-ignition detected, and this I know from talking to the tuners who've tuned my car (using both base SCT files and also the stock software in my car, which came with an unusually aggressive 29º ignition timing from the factory in the "aggressive" map).

So Ford saying that the Bullit's PCM has "octane detection" literally amounts to the PCM running an aggressive timing map as the default, and if knock is detected it backs off the timing, the same as the Spanish Oak has done so far on S197 GT's, except that the aggressive file is a little more aggressive, hence the 15 hp bump.

TMS is a great forum, but if you want to inject more specific technical information into your knowledge-base, I invite you to visit www.S197Forum.com

Last edited by MrClean; Apr 6, 2008 at 03:41 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 03:51 PM
  #97  
RCSignals's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 27, 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
It's not a 15hp bump on premium. It's a 15 hp increase over a normal GT on regular gas.

The Bullitt is tuned to run on Premium, it will adapt for regular if regular is used.
Tuners are making assumptions about this being only accomplished through knock sensors, but none have duplicated it, yet.

A normal GT that is tuned to run on regular will of course still run on Premium. As indicated in the manual knock sensors will compensate somewhat for poorer grades of regular if there is pinging using regular gas.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #98  
MrClean's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RCSignals
It's not a 15hp bump on premium. It's a 15 hp increase over a normal GT on regular gas.

The Bullitt is tuned to run on Premium, it will adapt for regular if regular is used.
Tuners are making assumptions about this being only accomplished through knock sensors, but none have duplicated it, yet.

A normal GT that is tuned to run on regular will of course still run on Premium. As indicated in the manual knock sensors will compensate somewhat for poorer grades of regular if there is pinging using regular gas.
Therefore, the "logic" is the same in both cases, except the Bullitt's "standard" timing map is a little more aggressive than a non-Bullitt GT's standard timing map, and backs off to a secondary timing map accordingly when 87 is burned, due to knock detection. The Bullitt engine also has increased airflow with the CAI, which probably accounts for a portion fo the 15 hp.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 08:02 PM
  #99  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Originally Posted by Martimus
+1! Seems to me its the GT/CS owners who see fit to tell us that our Bullitts are inferior... and then blame us for starting the bickering.

2k7gtcs: Mr. President... Is that you??

I personally like the GT/CS's... I'd never own one but thats cuz all the scoops are just too "over the top" for me.
Martimus and RCSignals, you are incorrect about my posts and comments. Find the post where I have attacked the Bullitt car or said it was inferior. You're picking on the wrong guy here. I have poked fun at some Bullitt owners for their proclivity to argue with all other GT owners, especially GT/CS owners who don't automatically say the Bullitt is better than their own cars. Check the posts and get your facts straight. It is because of posts like the ones above that I have written what I have. I've even said I like the Bullitt, I like George's Bullitt, I like all Mustangs. You however are exclusive and called me a Bling boy, I went along with it in good nature, but now I'm just tired of it.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #100  
MrClean's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Martimus and RCSignals, you are incorrect about my posts and comments. Find the post where I have attacked the Bullitt car or said it was inferior. You're picking on the wrong guy here. I have poked fun at some Bullitt owners for their proclivity to argue with all other GT owners, especially GT/CS owners who don't automatically say the Bullitt is better than their own cars. Check the posts and get your facts straight. It is because of posts like the ones above that I have written what I have. I've even said I like the Bullitt, I like George's Bullitt, I like all Mustangs. You however are exclusive and called me a Bling boy, I went along with it in good nature, but now I'm just tired of it.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:51 AM.