Which is Better All Car vs. Car Topics

96-98 Cobra vs. 94-95 GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/1/07, 05:52 PM
  #21  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
yeah i dunno why this one was dug up...but a 96-98 cobra would embaress a 94-95 GT.
Old 7/2/07, 06:54 AM
  #22  
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Scothew's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Sticks, AL
Posts: 22,688
Received 48 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by bluethunderhorse
I know this is late but I just found this site, but I know from experience that a stock 94 GT will blister the hide of a 98 Cobra. I have a 94 with 2 chamber flows and a k&n filter and my best friend had a 98 cobra. From a 60 mph kick I rolled him 5 car lengths and stayed there until I let off
Man i am having a hard time believe that unless your car had nitrous or some other serious power adder (h/c/i). 60mph up is a 96-98 4v's sweet spot as its a high rpm motor.
Old 7/2/07, 09:24 AM
  #23  
Post *****
 
future9er24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Old 7/2/07, 10:18 AM
  #24  
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Scothew's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Sticks, AL
Posts: 22,688
Received 48 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by future9er24
Old 7/2/07, 12:46 PM
  #25  
 
cntchds's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 23, 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
It means he agrees.

Arin must still not understand that not every person who shares his opinions is not as "stupid" as he is.
Old 7/2/07, 04:14 PM
  #26  
Mach 1 Member
 
Every_Mn's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 24, 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Fordracing200
HP isnt everything, torque is what matters. u would have to drive each of them to know. i wanted to know from someone with expeirence. no offense to you.
Please tell me where you got this idea, and then explain how plenty of cars with little torque (ie: Ferraris) are so **** fast.

What matters is how fast you can move through the powerband. So what if the Cobra has less torque or if it's at a higher rpm, slap in some lower gears (ie: 3.73s vs 3.27s) and you'll be in that range much faster.
Old 7/2/07, 10:10 PM
  #27  
Cobra R Member
 
bluethunderhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 30, 2007
Location: Summerville GA
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
it was a 3rd gear kick at 60 mph on an up hill road back before i built the motor
Old 7/3/07, 05:37 AM
  #28  
Bullitt Member
 
ipchay61's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A '94-'95 GT will do 0-60 in 6.0 - 6.5 seconds and run a high 14/ low 15 quarter mile while a '96- '98 Cobra will do 0-60 in 5.0 - 5.5 and the 1/4 in high 13's to low 14's assuming both cars are stock. You do the math.
Old 7/7/07, 05:31 PM
  #29  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bluethunderhorse
I know this is late but I just found this site, but I know from experience that a stock 94 GT will blister the hide of a 98 Cobra. I have a 94 with 2 chamber flows and a k&n filter and my best friend had a 98 cobra. From a 60 mph kick I rolled him 5 car lengths and stayed there until I let off
This is just not happening. Either the driver completely sucked or the car has issues or both. There is no way a '94 GT is taking a '96-'98 Cobra without significant work.

Old 7/7/07, 05:35 PM
  #30  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For people with '96-'98 Cobras, the key to these cars is the rear. I believe the stock rear was 3.08. I was told by numerous people that dollar for dollar changing the gears gives you the biggest gain in these cars. I put in 3.73s and MAN, it woke the car RIGHT up. The first, second and third gear pull seemed as if it was doubled by doing this.

That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
Old 7/9/07, 01:01 AM
  #31  
Bullitt Member
 
fastduo's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 19, 2006
Location: Sunny Miami, FL
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 97svtgoin05gt
For people with '96-'98 Cobras, the key to these cars is the rear. I believe the stock rear was 3.08. I was told by numerous people that dollar for dollar changing the gears gives you the biggest gain in these cars. I put in 3.73s and MAN, it woke the car RIGHT up. The first, second and third gear pull seemed as if it was doubled by doing this.

That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.

Ding, ding, ding. Gears and your done! Down low they do feel sluggish with a stock rear end but change the gears to 3.73 or even better to 4.10 and it is a totally different car.
Old 7/12/07, 07:55 AM
  #32  
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Scothew's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Sticks, AL
Posts: 22,688
Received 48 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by 97svtgoin05gt
For people with '96-'98 Cobras, the key to these cars is the rear. I believe the stock rear was 3.08. I was told by numerous people that dollar for dollar changing the gears gives you the biggest gain in these cars. I put in 3.73s and MAN, it woke the car RIGHT up. The first, second and third gear pull seemed as if it was doubled by doing this.

That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
Stock in alll 96-98 cobras was 3.27. Even with stock gears, I dont see how in the world it was possible for a 94gt to "blister the hide" of a 96-98 cobra, unless the cobra wasnt trying.

3rd gear at 60 with teh stock gears is acctually low in the 96-98's powerband, but as soon as they hit over 3500rpm its on. Sorry without seeing this, I cant believe it.

But yes, put in gears in a 96-98 and its a night and day difference. I ran 4.10's full time on the street and was completely happy with it. If I wasnt running nitrous or anything, 4.30's wouldnt have been a bad option either.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Autotooner
SN95 Mustang
11
11/24/17 12:42 PM
blackhawkkid308
1994-2004 V-8
18
12/22/15 03:17 AM
trackpack13gt
SN95 Mustang
6
10/2/15 08:20 PM
blackhawkkid308
Introductions
0
9/30/15 04:04 PM
Ray11
2010-2014 Mustang
2
9/25/15 12:43 PM



Quick Reply: 96-98 Cobra vs. 94-95 GT



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.