96-98 Cobra vs. 94-95 GT
I know this is late but I just found this site, but I know from experience that a stock 94 GT will blister the hide of a 98 Cobra. I have a 94 with 2 chamber flows and a k&n filter and my best friend had a 98 cobra. From a 60 mph kick I rolled him 5 car lengths and stayed there until I let off
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, California
It means he agrees. 
Arin must still not understand that not every person who shares his opinions is not as "stupid" as he is.
Arin must still not understand that not every person who shares his opinions is not as "stupid" as he is.
Mach 1 Member
Joined: December 24, 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
What matters is how fast you can move through the powerband. So what if the Cobra has less torque or if it's at a higher rpm, slap in some lower gears (ie: 3.73s vs 3.27s) and you'll be in that range much faster.
Bullitt Member
Joined: April 11, 2006
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: SC
A '94-'95 GT will do 0-60 in 6.0 - 6.5 seconds and run a high 14/ low 15 quarter mile while a '96- '98 Cobra will do 0-60 in 5.0 - 5.5 and the 1/4 in high 13's to low 14's assuming both cars are stock. You do the math.
Shelby GT500 Member
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
I know this is late but I just found this site, but I know from experience that a stock 94 GT will blister the hide of a 98 Cobra. I have a 94 with 2 chamber flows and a k&n filter and my best friend had a 98 cobra. From a 60 mph kick I rolled him 5 car lengths and stayed there until I let off
Shelby GT500 Member
Joined: July 21, 2004
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
For people with '96-'98 Cobras, the key to these cars is the rear. I believe the stock rear was 3.08. I was told by numerous people that dollar for dollar changing the gears gives you the biggest gain in these cars. I put in 3.73s and MAN, it woke the car RIGHT up. The first, second and third gear pull seemed as if it was doubled by doing this.
That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
Bullitt Member
Joined: July 19, 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 2
From: Sunny Miami, FL
For people with '96-'98 Cobras, the key to these cars is the rear. I believe the stock rear was 3.08. I was told by numerous people that dollar for dollar changing the gears gives you the biggest gain in these cars. I put in 3.73s and MAN, it woke the car RIGHT up. The first, second and third gear pull seemed as if it was doubled by doing this.
That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
Ding, ding, ding. Gears and your done! Down low they do feel sluggish with a stock rear end but change the gears to 3.73 or even better to 4.10 and it is a totally different car.
For people with '96-'98 Cobras, the key to these cars is the rear. I believe the stock rear was 3.08. I was told by numerous people that dollar for dollar changing the gears gives you the biggest gain in these cars. I put in 3.73s and MAN, it woke the car RIGHT up. The first, second and third gear pull seemed as if it was doubled by doing this.
That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
That car ran very very well. With the exception of the weak tranny (which I had to replace) it was rock solid.
3rd gear at 60 with teh stock gears is acctually low in the 96-98's powerband, but as soon as they hit over 3500rpm its on. Sorry without seeing this, I cant believe it.
But yes, put in gears in a 96-98 and its a night and day difference. I ran 4.10's full time on the street and was completely happy with it. If I wasnt running nitrous or anything, 4.30's wouldnt have been a bad option either.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
