2012-2013 BOSS 302

What do you think it will take to hit 500whp NA with a Boss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 12:01 PM
  #61  
MrBonus's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 1
From: DE
I don't think it's sacrilege. I think it's a waste of money. I wish I could take back most of the money I spent modifying cars as a youth and reallocate it to track time. My cars would be a lot faster today as a result without ever having to change as much as an air filter.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #62  
ShaneM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 22, 2010
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by MrBonus
I don't think it's sacrilege. I think it's a waste of money. I wish I could take back most of the money I spent modifying cars as a youth and reallocate it to track time. My cars would be a lot faster today as a result without ever having to change as much as an air filter.
i can understand mod regret, had a bit of that with my 05 when i didn't go blower first. once the 10 came that was the first thing i did. i plan to mod to some extent, not nearly as much as i did with my 10, but i also plan on track time when i can too with an instructor. the closest track to me is texas world speedway and its a haul of multiple hours. i was just thinking the other day that if i want to move to some more track specific tires since i have no truck or trailer i will have to drive the beast all that way on what ever dot r comps i put on the car. how do those of you that track often and don't have a truck or trailer handle tires? run stock tires, roll up on DOt r-comps, or just cram the other wheels/tires in the car lol
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 01:47 PM
  #63  
MrBonus's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 10, 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 1
From: DE
Originally Posted by ShaneM
i can understand mod regret, had a bit of that with my 05 when i didn't go blower first. once the 10 came that was the first thing i did. i plan to mod to some extent, not nearly as much as i did with my 10, but i also plan on track time when i can too with an instructor. the closest track to me is texas world speedway and its a haul of multiple hours. i was just thinking the other day that if i want to move to some more track specific tires since i have no truck or trailer i will have to drive the beast all that way on what ever dot r comps i put on the car. how do those of you that track often and don't have a truck or trailer handle tires? run stock tires, roll up on DOt r-comps, or just cram the other wheels/tires in the car lol
I've crammed other wheels/tires in a car before. I've also driven to the track on R Compounds (a faux pas amongst track regulars) and street tires.

To be honest, since I run HPDEs and do so non-competitively, I've switched almost exclusively to max performance summer tires. You get 90% of the grip of an NT01, Corsa, or R888 without the hassles of cost, accelerated wear, or heat cycling. The only issue is heat management on those exceptionally hot summer days. After I burn through the OEM Corsas on my Laguna Seca, I doubt I'll be ponying up the $2200 to replace them.

I understand your point of view, especially with your lack of local road courses. I'll certainly be following your quest for 500 wheel horsepower closely even if I won't be attempting to mirror your results.

Last edited by MrBonus; Apr 11, 2011 at 01:51 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 06:27 PM
  #64  
Chris23's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2011
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: MO
I put a WMS (Western Motorsports) CAI on the last stang that I owned and I plan on doing the same with my boss. I find it hard to believe that by having the filter tucked down in the left corner can flow anywhere near as much air as the WMS setup that puts a huge filter right out in front of the engine and acts as a ram air. Not to mention how much cooler the air is coming straight through from the front. If you are not familiar with these intakes just look them up. I think you will like.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 06:47 PM
  #65  
ColoSpringsStang's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Ford claims it can up the 2011 and up stangs GTs by 60 tq at 1500 rpm with their tuner if this is accurate then its the best 4xx dollars for your money
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 07:09 PM
  #66  
Bossdog's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 15, 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Originally Posted by ColoSpringsStang
Ford claims it can up the 2011 and up stangs GTs by 60 tq at 1500 rpm with their tuner if this is accurate then its the best 4xx dollars for your money
That would be AWESOME! Ford who? Ford Racing? Ford Marketing? Do you have a copy of an articel? I'd be interested to know more.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #67  
Bossdog's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 15, 2011
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
Originally Posted by assasinator
no difference at all. the JPc's are pocket ported. very mild not wild. you have larger exhaust valves in the BOSS.

cams, cai, longtubes and tune. nothing more. your boss will make 500rwhp easily. probably more because it can rev to 8200.




the JPC reading IS LOW. its a loaded dyno just like a mustang. the 507 rwhp is going to be higher on a dyno jet. expect cammed GT's to get 460rwhp. you guys get over 500rwhp.
Doesn't the Boss already come with a "more aggressive" cam? Are you suggesting an additional step up from the boss cam?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 07:24 PM
  #68  
ShaneM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 22, 2010
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Bossdog
Doesn't the Boss already come with a "more aggressive" cam? Are you suggesting an additional step up from the boss cam?
on a side note i noticed the cams for the 302r fit the boss heads, i wonder what that will do for power. they are cheap too, it would be like $700 for the pair of exhaust cams.

i'd liek to see the spec son teh cams that NA post up towards the top used so we can compare them to the boss cam.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 07:27 PM
  #69  
Brawlin' Boss's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 21, 2011
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Laredo, Tx
Of course we are suggesting a more aggressive cam, remember what has been said before, that it idles very smooth, that motor is begging to get cammed. Why else would it have all that headwork and trick intake manifold. Ford just gave us a wicked platform of power.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 10:25 PM
  #70  
Bloody_Knuckles's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 31, 2011
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by ColoSpringsStang
Ford claims it can up the 2011 and up stangs GTs by 60 tq at 1500 rpm with their tuner if this is accurate then its the best 4xx dollars for your money
In high school, I used to claim I had slept with 60 chicks, but...



Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 10:30 PM
  #71  
Big Vito's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2011
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bloody_Knuckles

In high school, I used to claim I had slept with 60 chicks, but...

It wasn't the best 4xx dollars for your your money?

Last edited by Big Vito; Apr 11, 2011 at 10:32 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2011 | 10:35 PM
  #72  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Whammer
Not going to happen.
Originally Posted by MustangFanatic
Agreed - won't make 500 RWHP in naturally aspirated trim. If you want mega dyno numbers, buy a Shelby
Already did
People speak too soon all the time. lol
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 07:37 AM
  #73  
RTD's Avatar
RTD
GT Member
 
Joined: April 4, 2011
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cloud9
At the track with my buddy in his modded 5.0 he commented "I'm running IAT about 10 degrees above ambient" and was pretty happy about that. It was 88 degrees ambient and I was running 91 IAT. So clearly the Boss is bringing fresh air in effectively. The heat from the track alone should have been worth a few degrees so to only be 3 degrees above ambient at that temperature was pretty impressive to me. My GT500 with the FRPP CAI runs IATs 10 degrees above amibent. Is there much gain to changing the CAI on the Boss even with a tune? I'd appreciate a response explaining this.
The gains realized on MODERN cars with a CAI (usually 10-15 hp on the new Mustangs) have nothing to do with colder air and certainly nothing to do with a ram effect. It has everything to do with removing the air inlet resonator from the intake ducting. This is a restriction added by the manufacturer to reduce intake noise. As your friend saw, most modern cars already take in air from a cool area, unlike say 20+ years ago when CAIs actually worked by bringing in cooler air.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 08:14 AM
  #74  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Originally Posted by ShaneM
on a side note i noticed the cams for the 302r fit the boss heads, i wonder what that will do for power. they are cheap too, it would be like $700 for the pair of exhaust cams.
They ARE the Boss cams.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 08:18 AM
  #75  
PTRocks's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Originally Posted by Brawlin' Boss
Of course we are suggesting a more aggressive cam, remember what has been said before, that it idles very smooth, that motor is begging to get cammed. Why else would it have all that headwork and trick intake manifold. Ford just gave us a wicked platform of power.
The idle is smooth because with a quad cam the overlap can now be changed as a function of RPM and load. There's no need to have a big overlap at idle, as used to be the case when the intake and exhaust lobes were on the same cam. This is also what is making the Red Key lopey idle possible to create with just a tune.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 09:58 AM
  #76  
Brawlin' Boss's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 21, 2011
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: Laredo, Tx
PTRocks you are correct and I hadn't really thought about that, BUT, I still would like to see what a HiPo 302 would do with slightly larger cams. You know this thing is a caged lion!!
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 10:06 AM
  #77  
ShaneM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 22, 2010
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by PTRocks
They ARE the Boss cams.
i guess i misread it, i thought the description was saying they had more duration than stock cams - stock i took to mean stock boss cams. perhaps it meant stock gt cams.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 10:06 AM
  #78  
ShaneM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 22, 2010
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by fdjizm
Already did
People speak too soon all the time. lol
linky
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 10:08 AM
  #79  
Mustang_Man's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 10, 2011
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: So. NH
Yep.

Ti-VCT

Twin Independent Variable Camshaft Timing (Ti-VCT) is the name given by Ford to engines with the ability to vary the camshaft timing of both the intake and exhaust camshafts independently. Despite the name difference, its operation is the same as standard VCT. Unlike the original versions of VCT, which only operated on a single camshaft, Ti-VCT allows the PCM to advance or retard the timing of both the intake and exhaust camshafts independently. This allows for improved power and torque, particularly at lower engine RPM, as well as improved fuel economy and reduced emissions
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2011 | 10:12 AM
  #80  
ShaneM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 22, 2010
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by BOSS_man
Yep.
i was hoping he meant a boss had already hit 500whp NA, he probably meant the GT linked up higher in this thread though.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM.