What DON'T you want to see in the next gen Mustang?
#82
Mach 1 Member
Drive slower. lol
What if they put one on the left side of the column where they could also have the iPod/iPhone/Other cradle? Basically an aux input in the console and another one over where the light switch is along with a spot for phone/music device.
What if they put one on the left side of the column where they could also have the iPod/iPhone/Other cradle? Basically an aux input in the console and another one over where the light switch is along with a spot for phone/music device.
Last edited by Krohn; 6/25/13 at 10:11 AM.
#84
Mach 1 Member
Down for that. I never even use the outlet between the vents. I don't want wires hanging all over the place.
#85
Bullitt Member
Join Date: July 3, 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I use that 12v port all the time when I'm using my phone for navigation. I bought a short 6" black iPhone chord and a back stubby 12v power plug. It's perfect for me.
#86
Cobra Member
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a side note, Apple is looking to get into the car software market as well. Basically with most manufacturers other than Ford.
#87
Bear Eats King...
Bear ****s Bone
Bear ****s Bone
Join Date: September 5, 2011
Location: Cleburne, Tx
Posts: 5,302
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Thats going to have to come down to Microsoft. Which will cause trouble for Apple users like we see now (Sync can't read iPhone text messages last time I heard). I'd rather have an Apple system integrated than something Microsoft creates any day.
On a side note, Apple is looking to get into the car software market as well. Basically with most manufacturers other than Ford.
#88
Shelby GT350 Member
Thats going to have to come down to Microsoft. Which will cause trouble for Apple users like we see now (Sync can't read iPhone text messages last time I heard). I'd rather have an Apple system integrated than something Microsoft creates any day.
On a side note, Apple is looking to get into the car software market as well. Basically with most manufacturers other than Ford.
#89
Cobra R Member
#93
Bullitt Member
Join Date: December 26, 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My Ford Touch
#95
#98
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#100
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: August 28, 2005
Location: Winnipeg Mb. Ca
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
14 Posts
These recommendations are based on my experiences with my 05 GT.
I don't want to see a passenger wiper blade stop right between my eyes and deposit heavy rain from the right side of the windshield right in front of my face. Might as well be driving impaired. Redesign the wiper transmission so it stops the passenger blade 3-4" more to the right.
I don't want to see the Canadian version GT speedometer with the 40/80/120 km highlighted. 60/100 which are more common speed limits are barely legible and worse with sunglasses worn. C'mon, if you can highlight all the numbers on the Boss and GT 500 you can do the same for GT. Better yet, get rid of that retro look and put a larger more legible instrument cluster together. I like retro looks but there's no need to use it if it make the vehicle non-functional or a safety hazard.
I'm no engineer, however I don't want to see a transmission that has the shifter mounted between the transmission and vehicle chassis. I've never had a manual transmission give me 2-3 shift problems shifting under high torque. I feel the shifter should be mounted solely to the transmission to avoid any chance of flex when engine is torqued.
I don't want to see a passenger wiper blade stop right between my eyes and deposit heavy rain from the right side of the windshield right in front of my face. Might as well be driving impaired. Redesign the wiper transmission so it stops the passenger blade 3-4" more to the right.
I don't want to see the Canadian version GT speedometer with the 40/80/120 km highlighted. 60/100 which are more common speed limits are barely legible and worse with sunglasses worn. C'mon, if you can highlight all the numbers on the Boss and GT 500 you can do the same for GT. Better yet, get rid of that retro look and put a larger more legible instrument cluster together. I like retro looks but there's no need to use it if it make the vehicle non-functional or a safety hazard.
I'm no engineer, however I don't want to see a transmission that has the shifter mounted between the transmission and vehicle chassis. I've never had a manual transmission give me 2-3 shift problems shifting under high torque. I feel the shifter should be mounted solely to the transmission to avoid any chance of flex when engine is torqued.