2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

NEW 5.0 engine Photos Leaked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8/24/14, 07:20 AM
  #21  
Cobra Member
 
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps this is a preproduction car?
Old 8/24/14, 07:26 AM
  #22  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
SteelTownStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks fine to me... Not too concerned about reservoir tank either. Look, there is some dust on the intake tube... Oh, the horror!
Old 8/24/14, 07:30 AM
  #23  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
SteelTownStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 2 Go Snake
Where is the battery ? Did Ford get smart and put it in the trunk ?
Upper LH corner; under the cover... You can see the terminals...
Old 8/24/14, 08:05 AM
  #24  
Bullitt Member
 
Plim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 7, 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 486
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
A strut tower brace is not an option I guess?
Old 8/24/14, 08:11 AM
  #25  
FR500 Member
 
TripleBlack14's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 22, 2014
Location: Rockaway, NJ
Posts: 3,574
Received 118 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by Plim
A strut tower brace is not an option I guess?
Good point.

Look at the bolts where a brace would be attached...they're not long enough.

Also, what are those long bolts on the l/s strut tower? There don't seem to be similar bolts on the passenger side.
Old 8/24/14, 10:18 AM
  #26  
Legacy TMS Member
 
houtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Insane
Posts: 7,583
Received 667 Likes on 541 Posts
In regards to the strut tower brace issue... looking on the port side of the engine bay (can't call it driver's side anymore, right?!) you can see what appears to be two studs sticking out of the shock tower. And you can see that the nuts that are used on the *three* (no longer four) studs of the strut mounts are rather tall. So a shorter nut might be possible with an appropriately thin yet strong brace plate mount on those, but I'm more inclined to want to use those long studs instead.

Then you get to the starboard side of the bay, and... how ya gonna mount that brace? I mean... there's.. *stuff*... all in the way. Be a bit of a trick, I'd say. Not, of course, insurmountable, but still.

But do notice that there is *something* mounted on a similar set of long studs on that side, that then goes up beside the battery area. Perhaps a shield of some sort. So... that's probably where the best best for a brace is for mounting.

Still... all that crap in the way... Yeah, that's gonna be a fun engineering project, the starboard side of things. What a mess.



Hm... perhaps a '64-70 export brace system? That might work pretty well. Example: http://www.cjponyparts.com/export-br...FVJo7Aod4nQA3Q

Although, I can't tell where you'd put it on the firewall. And/or if it'll miss other stuff on the way between... And it might be that two braces, versus one, might need to be done...

Then again, seems there's still a brace goin' across the bays even with those, so..

---

You know, in looking at it a second time, it appears to me that the coil covers are the same, just the top is changed.

So a quick swap (and perhaps modification by dremel here and there?) of the '11-14 top cover is very doable, looks like to me.

And would be done if I had the problem of getting a '15. Which I won't. Because not only is the engine bay hideous overall, but that front end needs work.

Ford, what the hell? I mean, really?

/Yeah, right, THATs why I wouldn't...
//One day, it will rain $20's or bigger up in here...

Last edited by houtex; 8/24/14 at 10:32 AM.
Old 8/24/14, 05:03 PM
  #27  
Member
 
tsunami's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 10, 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Battery box is covered and on passenger side firewall

The Battery is tight against the firewall on the passenger side. Looks nice but wait until you have to lift it out for replacement. There seems to be a strut
partially covering it.
Old 8/24/14, 05:12 PM
  #28  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Coyote5-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,151
Received 51 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
To echo your sentiments...

LSwhat????
Old 8/24/14, 05:13 PM
  #29  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Coyote5-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,151
Received 51 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by Plim
A strut tower brace is not an option I guess?
The frame is so **** rigid, it doesn't need one.
Old 8/24/14, 05:14 PM
  #30  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Coyote5-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,151
Received 51 Likes on 47 Posts
again, with the "d" word!!
Old 8/24/14, 06:35 PM
  #31  
Bullitt Member
 
Plim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 7, 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 486
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Coyote5-0
The frame is so **** rigid, it doesn't need one.
Sure ......
Old 8/24/14, 07:35 PM
  #32  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Coyote5-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,151
Received 51 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by Plim
Sure ......
HEY!! We don't know that for sure!! Although its highly unlikely.
Old 8/24/14, 08:02 PM
  #33  
2013 RR Boss 302 #2342
 
Mustang Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 6, 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 11,675
Likes: 0
Received 2,179 Likes on 1,626 Posts
Originally Posted by SteelTownStang
Looks fine to me... Not too concerned about reservoir tank either. Look, there is some dust on the intake tube... Oh, the horror!
Agree it can look like a plate of spaghetti for all I care! If she runs then woo hoo!!! Don't get me wrong it could look better but I'll take the performance first! :-)
Old 8/24/14, 09:00 PM
  #34  
Mach 1 Member
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Plim
A strut tower brace is not an option I guess?
The gt performance pack comes standard with both a strut tower brace and a k brace to the firewall
Old 8/24/14, 09:07 PM
  #35  
Bullitt Member
 
Plim's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 7, 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 486
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by xlover
The gt performance pack comes standard with both a strut tower brace and a k brace to the firewall
That's interesting. Do you have any pictures? I wonder how they get that in.
Old 8/25/14, 07:27 AM
  #36  
Mach 1 Member
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Plim
That's interesting. Do you have any pictures? I wonder how they get that in.
They have been out on the internet for months now...... You can find tons at 6g but quick google search will do as well

Old 8/25/14, 08:19 AM
  #37  
Legacy TMS Member
 
houtex's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Insane
Posts: 7,583
Received 667 Likes on 541 Posts
Ah. I see I was right about those studs. Cool.

And it's not near the fitment problem I thought it'd be. Very nice!

Still gettin' the other cover though. It's not even expensive.
Old 8/25/14, 08:56 AM
  #38  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by xlover
They have been out on the internet for months now...... You can find tons at 6g but quick google search will do as well
I don't get why they designed a cover for the battery area but not the brake fluid reservoir area...
Old 8/25/14, 10:25 AM
  #39  
Mach 1 Member
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
I don't get why they designed a cover for the battery area but not the brake fluid reservoir area...
not sure if you have seen the engine bay in person or profile but the reservoir actually sits lower than the top of the engine, in photos from above especially with cell phones the aspect kinda enlarges it and give it alot more prominence than it has in real life.

i agree a darker color or cover might have looked a bit a bit better, but personally i would prefer it be more functional with a quick glance. i dont typically drive with the hood open so i dont really care that much

those that show their cars will find that a darker colored aftermarket solution will probably blend right out of view when modding the bay for better appearance

just my thoughts...
Old 8/25/14, 10:47 AM
  #40  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by xlover
not sure if you have seen the engine bay in person or profile but the reservoir actually sits lower than the top of the engine, in photos from above especially with cell phones the aspect kinda enlarges it and give it alot more prominence than it has in real life. i agree a darker color or cover might have looked a bit a bit better, but personally i would prefer it be more functional with a quick glance. i dont typically drive with the hood open so i dont really care that much those that show their cars will find that a darker colored aftermarket solution will probably blend right out of view when modding the bay for better appearance just my thoughts...
I haven't seen it in person yet. At least in pics, it looks silly to me that they designed a cover only for one side. It looks unfinished.


Quick Reply: NEW 5.0 engine Photos Leaked



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:15 AM.