Carscoop renderings
Carscoop renderings
Carscoop has some new renderings they are claiming are really close to the real thing. I hope to god not. This car is super boring. I personally think these renderings have very little character. The front end of the car looks very cookie cutter. I wouldn't buy this car on initial launch. I'd only buy the car if the aftermarket could fix that front end.
http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2012/10...d-Mustang.html
http://carscoop.blogspot.com/2012/10...d-Mustang.html
Interesting because its the one thats got the most slabsides and hard lines,
to other extremes that are too curvy.
Looks like they spent most of the time on the front...rear looks like a 'quick deadline, finish it up'
Goldilocks still hasn't found her 'just right'
to other extremes that are too curvy.
Looks like they spent most of the time on the front...rear looks like a 'quick deadline, finish it up'
Goldilocks still hasn't found her 'just right'
Originally Posted by Boomer
Interesting because its the one thats got the most slabsides and hard lines,
to other extremes that are too curvy.
Looks like they spent most of the time on the front...rear looks like a 'quick deadline, finish it up'
Goldilocks still hasn't found her 'just right'
to other extremes that are too curvy.
Looks like they spent most of the time on the front...rear looks like a 'quick deadline, finish it up'
Goldilocks still hasn't found her 'just right'
Interesting. About what I was expecting to see as far as dimensions, green house and overall lines etc.
I hope the final product has some of a AM Vantage influence rather than all Fusion.
Theres no way IMO that those rear lights remain that 60.s retro however.
I would expect the taillights to be much larger and more edgy.
Also lower with more agressive splitters/diffusers etc.
Dont think the retro guys are gonna like the rear deck that short...but
it could work if it were slightly more fastback-ish.
Just my .02
I hope the final product has some of a AM Vantage influence rather than all Fusion.
Theres no way IMO that those rear lights remain that 60.s retro however.
I would expect the taillights to be much larger and more edgy.
Also lower with more agressive splitters/diffusers etc.
Dont think the retro guys are gonna like the rear deck that short...but
it could work if it were slightly more fastback-ish.
Just my .02




looks like a 94-98 with a lame nose.
So I guess they just completely disregarded the reported louvered tail lights, which might I add were called the coolest part of the whole package by the source. I'm not buying this rendering.