2015 Mustang V8 engine bay spotted
If it has a smoother/Fusion-inspired/more aerodynamic nose, I wonder how much that will improve the MPG figures. Not that I believe that should be a reason for taking this styling approach (I love the bluff front ends of the Mustang/Challenger/Camaro) but increased mileage would be a nice fringe benefit. I bet it would cut the current consumption by 1 or 2 mpg on the highway
Can't wait to see what the body will look like a complete departure from where it is now will be interesting.
could just be the angles, but does it look the like the engine is lower and slightly farther back in the chassis?
Last edited by xlover; Nov 8, 2012 at 10:20 AM.
I like the direction it is headed. I would really like a platform closer to SN95 size than S197 size. I feel lost in my '09 with the amount of interior space between me and the doors. My 99's interior was a little snug but something in between, as this looks to be, could be great.
Looking at these pics it does seem to be a tighter engine bay and a front strut suspension with a revised geometry, although the possibility does exist that it may employ something of an sla front......maybe. Also the engine indeed does seem to be sitting lower and farther back for superior weight distribution and lower center of gravity. All in all i would say that this doesn't seem like a new platform but rather a revision of the existing one. Man am i dying to see spy pics of a preproduction unit running around
Originally Posted by Vickstang
First engine and engine bay spy pics of the 2015 Mustang:
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=91
Not going to embed as I got in trouble for doing that last time when the powers that be contacted me to remove.
http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=91
Not going to embed as I got in trouble for doing that last time when the powers that be contacted me to remove.
Euro pedestrian standards?
Last edited by bob; Nov 8, 2012 at 10:26 PM.
Er, yeah, those photos of the IRS have been around, and discussed, for months 
A lower, more set back engine would certainly support the Euro pedestrian crash standards (personally, I say teaching people sidewalks are for humans, roads are for cars would be more beneficial
) however it will also support a lower, more aerodynamic front facia and hood line.

A lower, more set back engine would certainly support the Euro pedestrian crash standards (personally, I say teaching people sidewalks are for humans, roads are for cars would be more beneficial
) however it will also support a lower, more aerodynamic front facia and hood line.
Originally Posted by Twin Turbo
Er, yeah, those photos of the IRS have been around, and discussed, for months

A lower, more set back engine would certainly support the Euro pedestrian crash standards (personally, I say teaching people sidewalks are for humans, roads are for cars would be more beneficial
) however it will also support a lower, more aerodynamic front facia and hood line.



What Cobra? They went away in 2004