'10-14 Interior and Audio Place to discuss 2010-2014 interior and audio type modifications.

I know we keep talking about speakers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/28/12 | 12:15 PM
  #21  
TheDivaDanielle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: July 4, 2012
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by laserred38
Haha I see. Well if you do go the route of full upgrade, maybe you can reuse the factory sub box and keep the system somewhat hidden

Also, how was the response of your sub in the GTO? I know those things have horrible trunk designs with the gas tank and trunk being sealed off from the cabin like a convertible.
It was ***. Pure ***. I had a 500w Memphis Mono-Amp and a Diamond DVC 12" sub. It sounded close to 50 times better in my ex-fiance's 2006 Mustang, than it ever did in my GTO.
Old 11/28/12 | 12:21 PM
  #22  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by TheDivaDanielle

It was ***. Pure ***. I had a 500w Memphis Mono-Amp and a Diamond DVC 12" sub. It sounded close to 50 times better in my ex-fiance's 2006 Mustang, than it ever did in my GTO.
Hah I see. I know on the audio forums I used to frequent, everyone hated that trunk design. Did you sell off that setup? Memphis and Diamond made solid gear too. Btw, GTO looked good! Love the G8 wheels on there. DDM had a Black Friday sale so I ordered my 3000k 55w high beams and 3000k 35w fogs. I have 5000k low beams from them now. I like the contrast look better now, but I used to like everything matching.
Old 11/28/12 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
Mr. V's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2012
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 17
From: Ontario, California
Originally Posted by laserred38

Yes.

And processors aren't any more expensive than a CAI and tune. Gimme a break. People are so willing to pay top dollar for little gains on performance parts, but when it comes to their sound, instantly everyone becomes a cheapskate. Yes, you want a flat eq - in an optimal listening environment, which a car is NOT. Reflections and people's tastes vary widely. A processor gives you the flexibility to tailor the sound to your own tastes and your car. Just swapping the speakers is a crapshoot - you're still limited to the factory eq and bass/treble adjustments, and you don't know if they a) work for your ears, b) work well with your stock tuning, until they're installed.

The proper way is to do speakers AND amps AND a processor, but most of you aren't willing to pay to play for all of that. That's why I suggest just the processor, because you have a higher chance of tailoring your factory system to where you're happy with it, versus trial and error on buying, installing and uninstalling speaker sets that you can't try out until they're in your doors.
I have used processors in the past and don't feel they are needed if your car comes from the factory with reasonable sized speakers with good placement from the factory. I feel the ford placement is actually pretty good in relation to the drivers position. That is just my opinion. I have heard and installed many systems that sound excellent with and without processing.
Old 11/28/12 | 12:57 PM
  #24  
TheDivaDanielle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: July 4, 2012
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Originally Posted by laserred38
Hah I see. I know on the audio forums I used to frequent, everyone hated that trunk design. Did you sell off that setup? Memphis and Diamond made solid gear too. Btw, GTO looked good! Love the G8 wheels on there. DDM had a Black Friday sale so I ordered my 3000k 55w high beams and 3000k 35w fogs. I have 5000k low beams from them now. I like the contrast look better now, but I used to like everything matching.
That amplifier had a habit of gobbling up subs, and unfortunately by the time I sold it, I had no working sub/subs. I still have the amp though. I'm thinking there was an issue that it kept eating up subs, so I'll likely not use it ever again.

Hit hard, it did.
Old 11/28/12 | 01:03 PM
  #25  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Mr. V

I have used processors in the past and don't feel they are needed if your car comes from the factory with reasonable sized speakers with good placement from the factory. I feel the ford placement is actually pretty good in relation to the drivers position. That is just my opinion. I have heard and installed many systems that sound excellent with and without processing.
You do if you a) want factory integration with the most flexibility/best sound quality possible, b) want to time align your system. The best factory placement in the world won't make up for time alignment unless you drive a McClaren F1. The factory system does have simple adjustments for sound focus (as far as I remember), but that's not good enough for me. And it depends on what kind of music you listen to - if you listen to music that doesn't actually have a soundstage (like EDM) you don't really need time alignment, even though I personally would still want the sound from all speakers reaching me at the same time.
Old 11/28/12 | 01:58 PM
  #26  
fgibbs's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2012
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by laserred38
Sounds good. With that in mind, I'd look to Hertz or Dynaudio. They are typically more mellow sounding. You can also piece together components from madisound or partsexpress, but you have to know what to look for as far as the speakers' parameters. You could do an all Dayton Audio set up, as they also are known for a nice mellow sound and are decently priced. I have a complete Hertz setup in my Escape, and it sounds great on all kinds of music - I wish I went with the equivalent Focal setup though. I just got a better deal on the Hertz stuff.
Do you happen to know what to suggest when it comes to the parameters? What would be a good frequency range on the different components? What hertz/focal setup would you have went with? What do you think about HAT speakers? I have seen a couple of setups from partsexpress like the Dayton RS180 for a midbass and I believe vifa XT25 tweeters but not if this is what would qualify for the sound I'm going for.
Old 11/28/12 | 04:22 PM
  #27  
Mr. V's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2012
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 17
From: Ontario, California
Originally Posted by laserred38

You do if you a) want factory integration with the most flexibility/best sound quality possible, b) want to time align your system. The best factory placement in the world won't make up for time alignment unless you drive a McClaren F1. The factory system does have simple adjustments for sound focus (as far as I remember), but that's not good enough for me. And it depends on what kind of music you listen to - if you listen to music that doesn't actually have a soundstage (like EDM) you don't really need time alignment, even though I personally would still want the sound from all speakers reaching me at the same time.
You make an excellent point about time alignment. I will be the first to admit my hearing isn't the best. Many people will not be able to tell the difference. You sound like someone that has an ear that can discern high end systems. In my experience, most do not. I have set up systems using a rta that reference perfectly for placement and frequency and I didn't like the sound.

I am not saying don't buy processors. I'm just saying for many folks it is overkill. I wouldn't recommend it unless someone is an audiophile. You mentioned in an earlier post how people will spend on performance mods and skimp on sound. I feel that like performance, it is best to buy a part and try it. Then decide if it needs augmentation.

I am in no way discounting your opinion. Many people feel it is better to buy all you might need to ensure the best results immediately. That is never a bad idea.
Old 11/28/12 | 05:08 PM
  #28  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Mr. V
You make an excellent point about time alignment. I will be the first to admit my hearing isn't the best. Many people will not be able to tell the difference. You sound like someone that has an ear that can discern high end systems. In my experience, most do not. I have set up systems using a rta that reference perfectly for placement and frequency and I didn't like the sound.

I am not saying don't buy processors. I'm just saying for many folks it is overkill. I wouldn't recommend it unless someone is an audiophile. You mentioned in an earlier post how people will spend on performance mods and skimp on sound. I feel that like performance, it is best to buy a part and try it. Then decide if it needs augmentation.

I am in no way discounting your opinion. Many people feel it is better to buy all you might need to ensure the best results immediately. That is never a bad idea.
I hear ya, and you're right, most people wouldn't know the difference or what to listen for. I've also tuned systems using an RTA and agree, tuning a system to have a flat response in a car makes it sound lifeless. It's all dependent on the specific vehicle and customer's tastes. I listen to such a wide variety of music, and I haven't had the time or money to properly deaden my current Escape, so road and wind noise interfere with my sound at highway speeds. It's still time aligned, so at least my image is centered, but the system isn't where I want it to be. It still sounds good, but not perfect.

I liken the processor to the handheld tuner for the ECU. It allows you the flexibility to tune the system stock, then add in components as you change them, same as a tuner for the engine. If you know where to look, or buy one used, they aren't that expensive when compared to other mods.
Old 11/28/12 | 05:17 PM
  #29  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by fgibbs
Do you happen to know what to suggest when it comes to the parameters? What would be a good frequency range on the different components? What hertz/focal setup would you have went with? What do you think about HAT speakers? I have seen a couple of setups from partsexpress like the Dayton RS180 for a midbass and I believe vifa XT25 tweeters but not if this is what would qualify for the sound I'm going for.

As far as parameters to look for, it's way more involved than I'd go into on here, and really it depends on the car. I don't have much experience with the S197s, so I can't say for sure. However, I can comment on brands that you're likely to be okay with - Dayton, like you mentioned is a good all around brand to stick with, and yes those RS180s are highly acclaimed. I have the XT25s in my Mustang and I loved them, but honestly they are huge format tweeters, so I wouldn't run them again. I'd rather run a separate 1-1.25" tweeter and 3" midrange (like I have in my Escape) for easier install.

In my Mustang I was running Peerless HD 6.5s with the XT25s and it was decent, but I wanted more mid bass. My doors were deadened but not sealed - those mids would perform better in a small sealed enclosure, but I never got around to it. The XT25s played pretty dang low - I believe I had them crossed at 1khz, which is low for a tweeter, but with the 3" I have in the Escape, I'm able to drop those down to 300hz, which raises the stage for the drums immensely (I have the 1"/3" combo on the A-pillars, fed by a hybrid setup - they are on the passive crossover, but my head unit sees them as one speaker set, not the combination - I just let the passive cross them over wherever that point is set).

I really wanted to run the yellow cone Focal K-series 3-ways, 6.5 in the factory location, 3/1 on the A-pillars with the passive crossover, and then I'd run a Dynaudio or JL ZR800 midbass where the factory 8" subs are. So again, it would be a hybrid active/passive 4-way front stage. That is getting into some $ though.

If I were going to piece together a system from parts express, the RS180 would be a good start, and I'd even do a 5.25 of the same line in the factory 5x7 location, then look around for a passive 3/1" combo to install on the A-pillars. That will make your tuning and time alignment a LOT easier to tackle, and save you a little money on the mid bass/range woofers. I'd also run the Dayton HO sub - I've always wanted to try them out, as they get nothing but praise from all over.
Old 11/28/12 | 08:39 PM
  #30  
fgibbs's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2012
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Thanks for the input and taking the time to explain in more detail laserred and as you can tell this is my first active setup. I am still learning about it for sure...lol. I was looking at the JL you mentioned before since they fit in the factory location and reuse the factory grille. I would assume its a true 8 inch sub vs the RS180. Sorry for my ignorance but what do you mean by a passive 3/1" combo for the a pillars?
Old 11/28/12 | 08:49 PM
  #31  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by fgibbs
Thanks for the input and taking the time to explain in more detail laserred and as you can tell this is my first active setup. I am still learning about it for sure...lol. I was looking at the JL you mentioned before since they fit in the factory location and reuse the factory grille. I would assume its a true 8 inch sub vs the RS180. Sorry for my ignorance but what do you mean by a passive 3/1" combo for the a pillars?
The JL ZR800 is a dedicated mid bass, not a sub. It would be perfect for that spot, and at the shop I used to work at, they did a system in a 08 (I believe) Roush just like that. The combo on the A-pillars is a 3" midrange combined with a 1" tweeter. Mine are fiberglassed in. I recommend going this route because the XT25s are bigger and deeper overall than my 3" midrange, and you get better response with the dedicated midrange/tweeter setup versus having one big tweeter play that whole range.
Old 11/28/12 | 09:03 PM
  #32  
fgibbs's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2012
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by laserred38
The JL ZR800 is a dedicated mid bass, not a sub. It would be perfect for that spot, and at the shop I used to work at, they did a system in a 08 (I believe) Roush just like that. The combo on the A-pillars is a 3" midrange combined with a 1" tweeter. Mine are fiberglassed in. I recommend going this route because the XT25s are bigger and deeper overall than my 3" midrange, and you get better response with the dedicated midrange/tweeter setup versus having one big tweeter play that whole range.
Gotcha...could I do a quality midrange in the 5x7 spot and mount a tweeter in the pillar or in the side mirror cover? I am trying to keep it as stealth as I can.
Old 11/28/12 | 09:20 PM
  #33  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by fgibbs

Gotcha...could I do a quality midrange in the 5x7 spot and mount a tweeter in the pillar or in the side mirror cover? I am trying to keep it as stealth as I can.
You could do that...8" in factory 8" spot, 5.25 in 5x7 spot and 1" in the mirror cover, or even do a custom component in the 5x7 spot like the factory Shaker Pro. Only thing with that is you won't get as much of an "upfront" sound stage. Higher frequencies are easier to locate by the ear, so it makes time aligning harder due to reflections and the higher frequencies hitting you from the side instead of in front of you. You typically want your tweeters as up front as possible. The mirror cover would be the best if you want to keep everything on the door, angle them at the opposite headrest of that side - driver's at passenger headrest and vice versa...
Old 11/28/12 | 09:35 PM
  #34  
fgibbs's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2012
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Thanks laserred for your help...I may play with the tweeter location once I get it going. Now I need to find out what frequency ranges to play at so I can choose some speakers and start piecing it together.
Old 12/25/12 | 01:29 AM
  #35  
cal_gecko's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 11, 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Wow -- I'm honestly amazed that people are complaining about the stock stereo system!!! I have the Shaker system in my 2012 Performance Package Premium V6 coupe, and I LOVE it.. it's by far the best sounding stereo system I've ever had in a car, and by far the best factory system I've heard in ANY car... I can't see what anyone would complain about!
Old 12/25/12 | 10:59 AM
  #36  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by cal_gecko
Wow -- I'm honestly amazed that people are complaining about the stock stereo system!!! I have the Shaker system in my 2012 Performance Package Premium V6 coupe, and I LOVE it.. it's by far the best sounding stereo system I've ever had in a car, and by far the best factory system I've heard in ANY car... I can't see what anyone would complain about!
You're really going to make me be mean on Christmas Day? You obviously have never heard a good system then...
Old 12/25/12 | 11:23 AM
  #37  
MyStang2010GB's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 4
From: Lithia, FL
Originally Posted by laserred38
You're really going to make me be mean on Christmas Day? You obviously have never heard a good system then...
LOL, I agree. The Shelby has the Shaker500 and I can't wait to upgrade the speakers / amp
Old 12/25/12 | 11:25 AM
  #38  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by MyStang2010GB

LOL, I agree. The Shelby has the Shaker500 and I can't wait to upgrade the speakers / amp
Haha that's pretty much all that thing needs!
Old 12/28/12 | 12:32 PM
  #39  
Rando's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 3, 2012
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
I think just upgrading the speakers will fix 90% of the muddy sound imo. The bass is enough for me. I can't possibly deal with any more vibrating plastic
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kponypower
GT
13
6/17/20 07:17 AM
CNFLCTD
GT350
4
8/4/17 07:08 AM
Mr. V
5.0L GT Modifications
15
12/24/16 02:57 PM
Fedupdave42169
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
11
10/20/15 10:29 PM
mustangsally_
05-09 Interior and Audio Mods
3
9/6/15 10:28 PM



Quick Reply: I know we keep talking about speakers



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM.