Our shop 2010 Camaro VS. our 2011 5.0 Mustang GT? Dyno charts!
6/18/10, 10:09 AM
#1
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Our shop 2010 Camaro VS. our 2011 5.0 Mustang GT? Dyno charts!
6/18/10, 10:22 AM
#2
MOTM Committee Member
This post by VelocityC6 on there is logical
That vendor is clearly just out to be a people pleaser and gain business
IMO Mustang looks pretty good in this comparison. Running 87 octane on a green motor not even broken in and it's within 6hp peak.....all while lugging around less weight.
6/18/10, 10:34 AM
#4
MOTM Committee Member
6/18/10, 01:37 PM
#5
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't see what the problem is. They made it very clear in the post that the car was running 87 and they are going to re-dyno on 93. The fact that car is doing that well on 87 is gravy!
6/18/10, 01:40 PM
#6
MOTM Committee Member
I have no problems with that, which is why I quoted the guy above.
But I could do without the vendor using thumbs up smilies sayin "looks like the Camaro wins" when he clearly knows his test actually favors the stang. He's just trying to brown nose camaro fans
But I could do without the vendor using thumbs up smilies sayin "looks like the Camaro wins" when he clearly knows his test actually favors the stang. He's just trying to brown nose camaro fans
6/18/10, 03:25 PM
#8
He also stated that in the 2 runs, the driver missed a shift and that traction control wasn't completely off. He was quite truthful, although slightly biased, with how things happened and why they did. As was already stated, it's quite impressive that the 5.0 did that well with everything going against it like that.
Last edited by mseymour3; 6/18/10 at 03:30 PM.
6/18/10, 03:58 PM
#9
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, that is impressive considering the all-new Mustang engine was sipping... gulping 87 octane. As Livernois Motorsports proved, these cars pick up quite a bit more horsepower and torque once the engine's broken in. Fill the 'Stang up with 93 and put about 1,000-1,500 miles on it. Then compare the dyno graphs. 
And, in my opinion, the Mustang looks much better than the Camaro.
And, in my opinion, the Mustang looks much better than the Camaro.
6/18/10, 05:06 PM
#10
GT Member
Join Date: April 2, 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They knew it would start some debate on the forum. Why post results that you know are bogus?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
5
7/21/15 02:08 PM