5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Edelbrock E-Force Supercharger Kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 05:56 PM
  #61  
The Beast 2014's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Ok, just yesterday I had a shop install the Brenspeed 675E on my 14 GT automatic. I know the guys pretty close and when one saw it they first thing they said was I am going to lose a ton of power when it gets hot. The other guy said it will be fine. After the install they ran it on the dyno 5 times. Yes 5. They did it so they could do runs with the engine really hot and see how high the IAT is after back to back to back pulls. Amazingly the HP and torque went up each pull about 3HP until it capped out at 547 rwhp.

This morning my buddy told me he couldn't believe it and he takes back anything he ever said about the Edelbrock. From my perspective the thing is a beast. It will break the tires loose at 70mph in 4th gear. I had my buddy tune it and I trust his tunes a lot. After reading posts all over the internet about Edelbrocks not giving power I was scared to buy one but in the end I am super happy I trusted my gut.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 06:07 PM
  #62  
sqidd's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2010
Posts: 208
Likes: 18
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by The Beast 2014
Ok, just yesterday I had a shop install the Brenspeed 675E on my 14 GT automatic. I know the guys pretty close and when one saw it they first thing they said was I am going to lose a ton of power when it gets hot. The other guy said it will be fine. After the install they ran it on the dyno 5 times. Yes 5. They did it so they could do runs with the engine really hot and see how high the IAT is after back to back to back pulls. Amazingly the HP and torque went up each pull about 3HP until it capped out at 547 rwhp.
The dyno is not the street. The heat loads are completely different. Keeping stuff cool on the dyno is child's play.

This morning my buddy told me he couldn't believe it and he takes back anything he ever said about the Edelbrock. From my perspective the thing is a beast. It will break the tires loose at 70mph in 4th gear. I had my buddy tune it and I trust his tunes a lot. After reading posts all over the internet about Edelbrocks not giving power I was scared to buy one but in the end I am super happy I trusted my gut.
What is it? 45deg out there? The tires are breaking loose because they have no traction in the cold. And it's a whole lot easier to keep IAT's in check when it's not hot out.

BTW, what are the IAT's at the end of a 4 gear pull? Do you know?
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 06:38 PM
  #63  
The Beast 2014's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 9, 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
I don't need the dyno to be the street. The dyno was so the car can be tuned and to check operation. The IAT was around 108 if I remember correctly but it was late and I would need to check.

BTW, it's never really that hot here. Either way my post is based on my experience so far and from guys who work exclusively on Mustangs for a long time. I guess we will find out when I take it to the track.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2016 | 08:12 PM
  #64  
NickyD's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: July 20, 2016
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Looks great bro

Originally Posted by FromZto5
I figured Tommy was going to chime in right away, and he did I like his car and his setup.

Jim, that being said, looks like ease of installation and stock look is what you're looking for and some of your MIR's.

I have my Magnuson set up and really like it. Did the install all myself with no cutting or grinding of any sort. Stock pulley was 3.9", 5.5 lbs of boost, and I was at 520whp with a JDM Engineering tune (link to dyno chart on my sig below). I have since upgraded to NGK plugs, 3.6 pulley, at 9 lbs of boost, with a new JDM tune, and am at 545whp. I plan to add a CFM intake, LTH, and hi flow cats soon, so I expect to be at 575whp.

Looks great bro but I can honestly tell you that the horsepower range that JDM told you is the only street range power that they know, from what I heard their better for track cars but they dogged my tune and I have an 11 Coyote with a 2.9 Whipple front feed. I'd recommend going elsewhere for a tune
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2016 | 09:14 AM
  #65  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by NickyD
Looks great bro but I can honestly tell you that the horsepower range that JDM told you is the only street range power that they know, from what I heard their better for track cars but they dogged my tune and I have an 11 Coyote with a 2.9 Whipple front feed. I'd recommend going elsewhere for a tune
Thanks... but I already had it dyno'd before my latest mod. You probably seen it on my sig from before. So I haven't had her re-dyno'd since my latest mods, but it's definitely way up from before. And I've had them for my tune for a long time. I trust them and their results have been verified.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2024 | 12:48 PM
  #66  
teacher's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SpectreH
The MAF in my setup is mounted right at the intercooler exit - about 12-18 inches prior to the throttle body, which is about the same distance it was in the stock configuration.


I went centri because I felt I didn't really need gobs more torque off the line in a car that can roast the rear tires in stock form. Of course with the i-1, I can select a mode that allows the CVT to build boost off the line.
The intake temp has nothing to do with intake length or if it's by the exhaust or not. When you compress air it gets hot. The more you compress it the hotter it will get. That is why there is a need for an after cooler of some sort. this is true with turbo's, blowers, or anything that compresses air or any gas for that matter. A blowers effectiveness or performance is rated by the volume of flow (cfm) and at what psi for the amout of force inputted (force to turn the blower) it has nothing to do with temp. if you take a set volume of air and compress it to a set volume, in X amount of time, it will release X amount of energy as heat. regardless of how you compress it. Most of blower screws are manufactured by eaton and rebranded.

The air temp should be checked at initial set up, checking the delta temp at the inlet and after the cooler to see the effectiveness.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2024 | 01:56 PM
  #67  
05stangkc's Avatar
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,515
Likes: 4,278
From: Visalia Ca.
Welcome,

We Would Love To Have You Do an Introduction With Some Pics of Your Stang in This Forum!


https://themustangsource.com/forums/f650/

Thanks For The Expertise Update in This Legacy Thread! Unlike Other Sites We Encourage Updates on Inactive Threads!

Kc ADMIN
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2024 | 04:46 PM
  #68  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,644
Likes: 2,509
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by teacher
The intake temp has nothing to do with intake length or if it's by the exhaust or not. When you compress air it gets hot. The more you compress it the hotter it will get. That is why there is a need for an after cooler of some sort. this is true with turbo's, blowers, or anything that compresses air or any gas for that matter. A blowers effectiveness or performance is rated by the volume of flow (cfm) and at what psi for the amout of force inputted (force to turn the blower) it has nothing to do with temp. if you take a set volume of air and compress it to a set volume, in X amount of time, it will release X amount of energy as heat. regardless of how you compress it. Most of blower screws are manufactured by eaton and rebranded.

The air temp should be checked at initial set up, checking the delta temp at the inlet and after the cooler to see the effectiveness.
Agreed! it's the size of the IC and HE which determine the IAT's...Meanwhile, I don't know if the OP is aware of this or not, but the person who designed the Saleen series VI S/C is the very same person who later went on to design the Edlebrock E-Force superchargers... If you look very closely to both blowers, side by side, you'll notice they are very similar as both include an inverted design with long intake runners and very similar HE, IC, HE pumps with identical IC reservoir tank sizes...

Anyhow, I can totally relate to what Sqidd brought up in his posts when regarding how the size of the IC and HE can make a difference between maintaining an efficient IAT or whether they don't flow quite enough air due to their inefficient sizes... I just happen to be one of the select few who's been running a Saleen series VI S/C on my 2006 GT and I can tell you thru my own personal experience that once my car reaches normal operating temps, my Saleen blower gets so hot than I can barely even touch it for very long before getting burned...

Therefore, I feel pretty confident the same also applies with the Edelbrock E-Force superchargers as well which still use the OEM heat exchangers, OEM IC reservoir tank and IC pumps...
Needless to say, I would at the very least consider upgrading to the OEM 2013 GT500 HE with IC pump and Shelby GT500 IC reservoir tank, if you should decide to stay with your current Edelbrock E-Force setup...
As for myself personally, I'm debating on whether to do the same upgrades for my current Saleen series VI S/C setup or just go for it all by upgrading to the D.O.B GT-450 S/C kit altogether...

In the meantime, thanks for providing your feedback and expertise towards updating a legacy thread such as this one which is still considered as very valuable, to say the very least...
That being said, welcome aboard!!!

Originally Posted by 05stangkc
Welcome,

We Would Love To Have You Do an Introduction With Some Pics of Your Stang in This Forum!


https://themustangsource.com/forums/f650/

Thanks For The Expertise Update in This Legacy Thread! Unlike Other Sites We Encourage Updates on Inactive Threads!

Kc ADMIN
I'll second that...

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; Sep 2, 2024 at 04:52 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2011 Kona Blue
'10-14 V6 Modifications
71
Oct 14, 2024 02:42 PM
southcarolina12
'10-14 V6 Modifications
57
Nov 5, 2013 01:34 PM
db2797
2010-2014 Mustang
29
Aug 6, 2012 12:45 AM
J. Dub
4.6L GT Modifications
23
Oct 23, 2010 05:17 PM
porsche
GT Performance Mods
7
Apr 26, 2005 12:23 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 AM.