Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Is a BOSS 302 INTAKE MANIFOLD worthwhile on a 13 GT 6sp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/24/12, 10:54 AM
  #41  
Bullitt Member
 
grabberblue 5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meh, maybe I was fooled into believing ~150 lbs extra weight would have made such a difference in trap speed. You don't think that having an adult passenger would slow you down that much? I mean its gotta do something to trap speed and time.

Either way back to the original point, peak power still comes well under 7600

Last edited by grabberblue 5.0; 12/24/12 at 10:55 AM.
grabberblue 5.0 is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 10:58 AM
  #42  
Bullitt Member
 
grabberblue 5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stang8psi

ha ha tool bag how does the sweat taste off that guys 300+ lbs *****??
COMMENT REMOVED!

Last edited by adrenalin; 12/26/12 at 05:19 PM. Reason: Insulting other members
grabberblue 5.0 is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 11:11 AM
  #43  
Cobra Member
 
sampey43's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 6, 2011
Location: new orleans
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOW!!!!
sampey43 is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 11:15 AM
  #44  
Bullitt Member
 
RCE EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 27, 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grabberblue 5.0
Meh, maybe I was fooled into believing ~150 lbs extra weight would have made such a difference in trap speed. You don't think that having an adult passenger would slow you down that much? I mean its gotta do something to trap speed and time.

Either way back to the original point, peak power still comes well under 7600
It might make a 1-2mph difference if that... And peak power with the boss manifold is redline bc the torque doesn't fall off like the factory manifold above 6500. But the factory manifold makes a little more torque in the midrange..
RCE EATR is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 12:39 PM
  #45  
Bullitt Member
 
stang8psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 1, 2010
Location: Slower Lower Delaware
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grabberblue 5.0
Comment removed
get off his ***** already.. you sound desperate for his man juice. Oh why are you defending this guy? Comment removed.

Last edited by adrenalin; 12/26/12 at 05:20 PM. Reason: Insulting other members
stang8psi is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 02:18 PM
  #46  
GT Member
 
JerseyGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stang8psi

get off his ***** already.. you sound desperate for his man juice. Oh why are you defending this guy?
Do you guys remember when this was about an intake manifold? Wow. Seriously. Lets all sack up and calm down.

Last edited by adrenalin; 12/26/12 at 05:20 PM.
JerseyGT is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 02:20 PM
  #47  
Mach 1 Member
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by grabberblue 5.0
Meh, maybe I was fooled into believing ~150 lbs extra weight would have made such a difference in trap speed. You don't think that having an adult passenger would slow you down that much? I mean its gotta do something to trap speed and time.

Either way back to the original point, peak power still comes well under 7600
You have clearly shown here in this thread you are really clueless. As I pointed out numerous times there's something wrong with your buddies dyno sheet. Dynos can be manipulated. Track times with a manual can very greatly with driver error. But the trap speed doesn't lie. His trap speed is very low for those numbers, no matter how hefty he is.
GrabberBlue5.0 is offline  
Old 12/24/12, 02:24 PM
  #48  
Mach 1 Member
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by JerseyGT
Do you guys remember when this was about an intake manifold? Wow. Seriously. Lets all sack up and calm down.
The problem is the original poster was looking for HONEST feedback on a part. When someone doesn't give honest feedback, they get called out.
GrabberBlue5.0 is offline  
Old 12/25/12, 07:11 AM
  #49  
Bullitt Member
 
grabberblue 5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 19, 2012
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stang8psi

get off his ***** already.. you sound desperate for his man juice. Oh why are you defending this guy?
Good job turning that back around on me, that must have taken a lot of brain power to give the response of a 6th grader lol

Like I said I was fooled into believing that, guess that's never happened to you Scott

Last edited by adrenalin; 12/26/12 at 05:21 PM.
grabberblue 5.0 is offline  
Old 12/25/12, 08:02 AM
  #50  
GT Member
 
black5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 7, 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone please close this thread!!!!
black5.0 is offline  
Old 12/25/12, 11:44 PM
  #51  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by black5.0
Someone please close this thread!!!!
^ this
conv_stang is offline  
Old 12/26/12, 09:03 AM
  #52  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Mustang66's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 17, 2012
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I originally asked the question about the Boss 302 Intake Manifold on a 2013 GT.
I have a 3.73 rear and a 6 Speed manual. I neglected to clearly mention these two features in my initial write up.

My mods are going to be a JLT 107mm CAI and a good performance tune. No other mods and the car will never be taken to the track.. Several people have mentioned a Boss 302 Intake as a consideration. From my research and from this discussion it looks like it would be a waste on this car. I would not risk this motor by driving above 7000 rpm.

Any thoughts on this?
Mustang66 is offline  
Old 12/26/12, 10:01 AM
  #53  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 6spd manual with 3.31's it's a little softer down low with the Boss Intake. But top end more than makes up for it. You have 3.73's you might not feel the loss down low with the gears. If you go Boss intake the CAI you get won't work. If you have the factory strut bar, it won't work either. Performance wise, I think you could get more Out of other mods. But if you plan on showing your car, it definitely looks awesome under the hood.
conv_stang is offline  
Old 12/26/12, 10:13 AM
  #54  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
wheelman's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 24, 2012
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by conv_stang
I have 6spd manual with 3.31's it's a little softer down low with the Boss Intake. But top end more than makes up for it. You have 3.73's you might not feel the loss down low with the gears.
This is what I was thinking.
wheelman is offline  
Old 12/26/12, 02:08 PM
  #55  
Mach 1 Member
 
GrabberBlue5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 3, 2011
Location: East Haven, Connecticut
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Mustang66
I would not risk this motor by driving above 7000 rpm.

Any thoughts on this?
Then this mod is not for you. If you don't have a good tune that is a good place to start.
GrabberBlue5.0 is offline  
Old 12/26/12, 03:22 PM
  #56  
Bullitt Member
 
RCE EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 27, 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah unless you spend a lot of time over 6500 rpms, its not going to help you unless you want it just for looks.
RCE EATR is offline  
Old 12/26/12, 05:21 PM
  #57  
Retired Tms Staff
 
adrenalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Ok, I have had it. This is closed and a few of you are getting a few days off.
adrenalin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
9
10/7/15 01:47 PM
RoushRS3
2010-2014 Mustang
7
9/29/15 08:03 PM
Christopher Fox Wallace
Fox Mustangs
1
9/26/15 11:55 AM



Quick Reply: Is a BOSS 302 INTAKE MANIFOLD worthwhile on a 13 GT 6sp?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 AM.