5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

2011 Mustang GT 5.0L Going To The Track and Dyno!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/4/10, 12:43 PM
  #441  
Bullitt Member
 
yeahyouknwit's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 25, 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On there FB page they said that they blew the clutch
Old 5/4/10, 12:43 PM
  #442  
Mach 1 Member
 
fritzOSU03's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 25, 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jayguy
Check the fb page, Fred makes a comment that the street tire run finished with the clutch in, that's why the mph was low. They were up against the limiter and pushed the clutch in.
Yup, here's their post.

Evolution Performance, Inc. "The clutch is officially Toasted, it lasted a lot longer then I thought! New one should be here tomorrow, but that one won't last long either! Upgraded clutches are going to be a must when running with sticky tires"
Old 5/4/10, 12:46 PM
  #443  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**** that sucks...I would of expected it to last a lot longer than that unless they just beat the hell out of it.
Old 5/4/10, 12:55 PM
  #444  
Mach 1 Member
 
fritzOSU03's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 25, 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown
**** that sucks...I would of expected it to last a lot longer than that unless they just beat the hell out of it.
I think they probably did. They said they got 12 runs out of it but who knows how many of them were on the M/Ts.
Old 5/4/10, 12:57 PM
  #445  
Cobra Member
 
mustangfan123's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fritzOSU03
"12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft"

Just posted on FaceBook.

sick MPH, that's high enough for almost mid 11's!
Old 5/4/10, 01:42 PM
  #446  
V6 Member
 
t-ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 26, 2010
Location: bham al
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jayguy
Check the fb page, Fred makes a comment that the street tire run finished with the clutch in, that's why the mph was low. They were up against the limiter and pushed the clutch in.
Ok. That makes much more sense.
Old 5/4/10, 02:25 PM
  #447  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The other thing about the high MPH on the drag tires is the ET streets, it looks like they are probably 28" tall tires on there if not taller so that would help the MPH considerably.
Old 5/4/10, 02:37 PM
  #448  
GT Member
 
PaulVincent's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 8, 2010
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ultrazls1
Has went 11.7 with full exhaust, CAI, tune, radials (stock suspension)...whats your point?
Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha!!! Slow SS Camaro!! Ha, Ha, Ha!!! Camaro - needs Z28 - maybe even more! Ha, Ha, Ha!!!
See Camaro jokers now - Ha, Ha, Ha!!! They own the street (not) - Ha, Ha, Ha!!! Camaro, Boat anchor, barge, anvil, anchor!!! "Like a rock!" Ha, Ha, Ha! Boy was that tag line appropriate!

Last edited by PaulVincent; 5/4/10 at 03:01 PM.
Old 5/4/10, 04:23 PM
  #449  
Mach 1 Member
 
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-ray
Those numbers just do not make sense.

Very first run, last week, was a 13.2x@110mph on street tires, with a 2.10 sixty, in good air.
This week, a run on street tires nets 12.61@108mph with a 1.96 sixty, in presumably marginally worse air(this early in the day).
Then later on, on full rubber, the same car picks up 9mph? Nine?

That middle run does not compute with the other runs. Picking up a tenth in the sixty doesn't equal a full 6 tenths on the big end(today's street tire run vs first run), especially when losing 2mph through the traps. And this car is supposedly making 40hp/30tq than last week.

And then it picks up NINE mph by swapping tires? Anybody else confused by these numbers?
9 mph from not just tires. It's 9 mph from tire, UCA/LCA's, OR X Pipe, Cat Back, K&N, and ECU tuning. That run was at 405rwhp.
Old 5/4/10, 04:33 PM
  #450  
Member
 
Ultrazls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 29, 2010
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PaulVincent
Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha!!! Slow SS Camaro!! Ha, Ha, Ha!!! Camaro - needs Z28 - maybe even more! Ha, Ha, Ha!!!
See Camaro jokers now - Ha, Ha, Ha!!! They own the street (not) - Ha, Ha, Ha!!! Camaro, Boat anchor, barge, anvil, anchor!!! "Like a rock!" Ha, Ha, Ha! Boy was that tag line appropriate!
Old 5/4/10, 05:19 PM
  #451  
Mach 1 Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-ray
Those numbers just do not make sense.

Very first run, last week, was a 13.2x@110mph on street tires, with a 2.10 sixty, in good air.
This week, a run on street tires nets 12.61@108mph with a 1.96 sixty, in presumably marginally worse air(this early in the day).
Then later on, on full rubber, the same car picks up 9mph? Nine?

That middle run does not compute with the other runs. Picking up a tenth in the sixty doesn't equal a full 6 tenths on the big end(today's street tire run vs first run), especially when losing 2mph through the traps. And this car is supposedly making 40hp/30tq than last week.

And then it picks up NINE mph by swapping tires? Anybody else confused by these numbers?
As stated they blew the clutch. Also you have to shift to fifth to trap over 110 mph with 3.73 and stock 255/40R19 Tires unless you raise the hard limiter. I suspect they were against the limiter in that original 110 mph pass.

I was guessing 120 mph with full bolt-ons. CAI (Not avaialble yet), Tune, Long Tubes (Not yet available) and Full Off-Road Exhaust, Pulleys (Likely minimal gains with the new super-efficient water pump). Im thinking I might have been a little low.

120 mph trap is going to require close to 7300 rpm in 4th with 3.55 and stock rubber (Dont forget finish line mph will be close to 122 mph). I didnt think I wanted to spin it past 7500 rpm so thats the reason I didnt get 3.73. We got 1.79 out of a CAI/Tune/4.10 4.6L-3V on Stock Rubber and with the lower 1st and more torque I believe the 5.0 will do at least as well without gears. I know many dont buy it and thats okay. The proof will be in the doing or not doing... Until then its just Ricer Math...and Im bored (Railroad is holding my car hostage)

PS I wont be suprised if 11's on the 5.0 are almost as easy as 12's on the 4.6L-3V.

Last edited by Gene K; 5/4/10 at 05:21 PM.
Old 5/4/10, 05:29 PM
  #452  
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gene K
thats the reason I didnt get 3.73.
You didn't get 3.73s just because of this? What percentage of driving are you at the drag strip?
Old 5/4/10, 05:30 PM
  #453  
Bullitt Member
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
117 mph is good for mid 11's. it will take more time to get the full ET out of the power. once the coyote gets to 435rwhp with bolt ons like an LS-3 mid 11's should be pretty easy.


i still want a boss 302 intake manifold for mine.

Last edited by assasinator; 5/4/10 at 05:32 PM.
Old 5/4/10, 06:49 PM
  #454  
V6 Member
 
t-ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 26, 2010
Location: bham al
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
9 mph from not just tires. It's 9 mph from tire, UCA/LCA's, OR X Pipe, Cat Back, K&N, and ECU tuning. That run was at 405rwhp.
No, the 9mph was from switching rubber, in comparison to the first run of the day on street tires. But as other people have pointed out, there were clutch problems and they were probably riding the limiter.
Old 5/4/10, 07:19 PM
  #455  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, if the ET streets are 28" tall, then the soft limit of 6850 makes for 116 mph, 118 at 7000 in 4th.

If they are 29" tall, they would be better off, would get them to 123 mph at 7000.
Old 5/4/10, 08:08 PM
  #456  
Team Mustang Source
 
bpmurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 13, 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evolution Performance
The Knock Sensors are very sensitive on the 2010 GT500, almost too sensitive that's why there has been four strategy changes from Ford for the Knock Sensors being to aggressive when hearing noises thinking it was knock even though it wasn't.

When we tune the 2010 GT500's on the dyno we turn the knock sensors off, tune the car with the necessary fuel, timing, DBW changes and then turn the knock sensors back on, but decrease the sensitivity. You maybe be running an old strategy with a higher sensitivity! You can read the strategy with your X3 to find out what it is!
Thanks for the response. I sent you a PM in regards to this with some more questions.
Old 5/5/10, 05:35 AM
  #457  
GT Member
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t-ray
No, the 9mph was from switching rubber, in comparison to the first run of the day on street tires.
That it correct.

Originally Posted by t-ray
But as other people have pointed out, there were clutch problems and they were probably riding the limiter.
I think that is incorrect.

From what I can tell the clutch blew AFTER the 12.04. At first I thought "wow" that's a great MPH. But you raised a good point earlier (as someone else did on another forum - a seasoned racer) ; the difference of 9mph doesn't make sense. Now that I think of it you can't just pick that much speed up with slicks. Maybe Fred can explain it when he gets on here.
Old 5/5/10, 06:01 AM
  #458  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on the run with stock tires they were hitting the limiter so they had to push the clutch in before they crossed the line so that is why the MPH on the first run yesterday was so low compared to their 111mph in previous stock tire runs.
Old 5/5/10, 06:04 AM
  #459  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jayguy
Check the fb page, Fred makes a comment that the street tire run finished with the clutch in, that's why the mph was low. They were up against the limiter and pushed the clutch in.
here is quote from regarding that...
Old 5/5/10, 07:51 AM
  #460  
GT Member
 
Falc'man's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for that, Todd.

So, just to get my head around this, this problem didn't occur with the strip tyres as the higher tyre didn't require the extra rpm just before the end of the quarter, and nothing to do with the clutch itself having a problem?

Cheers.


Quick Reply: 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L Going To The Track and Dyno!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 PM.