'10-14 Roush Mustangs

Did anyone else read the Car and Driver review of the 2014 RS3 in the Nov 2013 Issue?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2/13/14 | 03:07 PM
  #41  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,165
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by devilcaninex
Cocaine is a helluva drug
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
And some could argue that getting shot in the face ain't all that bad...dont make them any less asinine.
Originally Posted by DarrenGT
HAHA, i just laughed so hard i snorted coffee out of my nose
HA HAAAAAAAAAAA
I didn't know the '99 Honda Civic was that kind of a beast?!?! Must be some serious front wheel drive horsepower and torque!!!
The following users liked this post:
my89foxbody (11/20/22)
Old 2/13/14 | 03:12 PM
  #42  
EastTNMustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 28, 2013
Posts: 396
Likes: 7
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by Stage_3
HA HAAAAAAAAAAA I didn't know the '99 Honda Civic was that kind of a beast?!?! Must be some serious front wheel drive horsepower and torque!!!
It's used by all of the major racing teams...right?
The following users liked this post:
my89foxbody (11/20/22)
Old 2/13/14 | 04:49 PM
  #43  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,165
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by 14rs3roush
It's used by all of the major racing teams...right?

Yeah,....thing's a beast.
Old 2/13/14 | 10:17 PM
  #44  
merv50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 4, 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Utah
So what is a realistic rwhp for a 2014 Stage 3?
Old 2/14/14 | 12:59 AM
  #45  
EastTNMustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 28, 2013
Posts: 396
Likes: 7
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by merv50
So what is a realistic rwhp for a 2014 Stage 3?
505-525...depending on the car and conditions at dyno.
Old 2/15/14 | 08:38 AM
  #46  
Thamac15's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2012
Posts: 595
Likes: 3
From: Waddell, AZ
Originally Posted by Stage_3
Yeah,....thing's a beast.
Lmao I had a 95 civic as my first car and that thing was indeed a beast! I think it ran a 19 as it's best time at the drag strip. I could swear it's faster than my gt. I may just go trade it for a civic now.
Old 2/15/14 | 09:51 AM
  #47  
thegame's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 3, 2013
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
If I could have afforded it outright, I would've went with an RS3. I ended up adding the RS1 package, minus the fogs, myself. And I just took delivery of my 575 TVS kit from Roush. Bolting the supercharger on by itself is good for at least 100 whp. The C&D numbers just don't add up. Either way, if the supercharged Roush is not good enough for some with the "stock" Roush tune, throw on a VMP / Brenspeed tune for another 50+ whp.
Old 2/15/14 | 12:13 PM
  #48  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,165
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Thamac15
Lmao I had a 95 civic as my first car and that thing was indeed a beast! I think it ran a 19 as it's best time at the drag strip. I could swear it's faster than my gt. I may just go trade it for a civic now.
HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Old 2/15/14 | 12:49 PM
  #49  
typesredline's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 11, 2013
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 21
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
And some could argue that getting shot in the face ain't all that bad...dont make them any less asinine.
Not sure who would argue that....
Old 2/15/14 | 12:52 PM
  #50  
typesredline's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 11, 2013
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 21
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Stage_3
HA HAAAAAAAAAAA I didn't know the '99 Honda Civic was that kind of a beast?!?! Must be some serious front wheel drive horsepower and torque!!!
Hp and tq don't define a cars fun potential. You guys are really closed minded to think that the rs3 is gods gift and those who disagree are on drugs.

Taken out of context the civic comparo seems silly. But you'd realize in my FULL statement that based on priorities in which one values a car, ANY Honda could but seen as a better option.
Old 2/15/14 | 01:18 PM
  #51  
Thamac15's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2012
Posts: 595
Likes: 3
From: Waddell, AZ
No one here thinks an rs3 is gods greates gift. And yes there are tons of factors that determine a cars overall capability and ones desire towards it. There are categories in the auto world. A civic and a mustang are not in the same. This is why I laugh at the rs3 wishing it were a 99 Honda.

Last edited by Thamac15; 2/15/14 at 01:22 PM.
The following users liked this post:
my89foxbody (11/20/22)
Old 2/15/14 | 02:14 PM
  #52  
Joeywhat's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2014
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 41
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by typesredline
Taken out of context the civic comparo seems silly. But you'd realize in my FULL statement that based on priorities in which one values a car, ANY Honda could but seen as a better option.
Well, based on my current priority of wanting some lunch, a cheese sandwich is a better option then a RS3...
Old 2/15/14 | 02:36 PM
  #53  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,165
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by typesredline
Hp and tq don't define a cars fun potential. You guys are really closed minded to think that the rs3 is gods gift and those who disagree are on drugs.
You are very correct about a car's HP and TQ numbers do not define a car's fun potential.
I think the Shelby is the top dog. (Actually, the Super Snake is. But, they start life as a Shelby.) And if I had the money, I would have been all over a 2013/2014 Shelby. No way is the RS3 "God's gift". Although,.....it is one ballsy car.

Originally Posted by typesredline
Taken out of context the civic comparo seems silly. But you'd realize in my FULL statement that based on priorities in which one values a car, ANY Honda could but seen as a better option.
So,.......people should buy a Honda because based on priorities in which one values a car, ANY Honda could have been seen as a better option?
Old 2/15/14 | 03:41 PM
  #54  
EastTNMustang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 28, 2013
Posts: 396
Likes: 7
From: Knoxville, TN
FYI...lance Cunningham ford in Knoxville, tn has a low mileage 2014 Roush Stage 3 for only $39k if anyone is looking for one.
The following users liked this post:
my89foxbody (11/20/22)
Old 2/15/14 | 04:30 PM
  #55  
Stage_3's Avatar
Roush Forum Stalker
 
Joined: March 9, 2013
Posts: 11,165
Likes: 1,749
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by 14rs3roush
FYI...lance Cunningham ford in Knoxville, tn has a low mileage 2014 Roush Stage 3 for only $39k if anyone is looking for one.
That is a killer price! Especially for a 2014.
Old 3/8/14 | 12:39 PM
  #56  
merv50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 4, 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Utah
I too read this article, and while I am not a professional driver and I don't own a Roush Stage 3 I have very recently driven a couple of them along with a couple of 14 gt premium's. The only thing I can figure is the stage 3 car and drive had must have been faulty in some way. The stage 3 is much quicker than a gt premium! It is very obviouse driving each, one after another. I am not saying the Roush is $10,000 or more better than a standard gt premium but it is much quicker!

Last edited by merv50; 3/8/14 at 12:43 PM.
Old 3/8/14 | 12:42 PM
  #57  
merv50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 4, 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Utah
[QUOTE=merv50;6768776]I too read this article, and while I am not a professional driver and I don't own a Roush Stage 3 I have very recently driven a couple of them along with a couple of 14 gt premium's. The only thing I can figure is the stage 3 car and drive had must have been faulty in some way. The stage 3 is much quicker than a gt premium! It is very obviouse driving each, one after another. I am not saying the Roush is $10,000 or more better than a standard gt premium but it is much quicker! Also IMO the Roush's are dang good looking! I would love to get one to a track and see what it will do in the 1/4.
Old 3/8/14 | 12:44 PM
  #58  
Ajcruz1's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2013
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by merv50
I too read this article, and while I am not a professional driver and I don't own a Roush Stage 3 I have very recently driven a couple of them along with a couple of 14 gt premium's. The only thing I can figure is the stage 3 car and drive had must have been faulty in some way. The stage 3 is much quicker than a gt premium! It is very obviouse driving each, one after another. I am not saying the Roush is $10,000 or more better than a standard gt premium but it is much quicker!
Well the stage 3 is supercharged and the GT is not. I would hope it would be quicker!
Old 10/7/15 | 06:06 AM
  #59  
ejpatrone's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: July 12, 2014
Posts: 73
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
I read the same article and was baffled with their results. My 2014 RS3 is much quicker than the 2014 GT I owned before this. I will say the launch in a RS3 needs to be controlled, spinning the tires will give me a bad ET. The RS3 will spin until all the rubber is gone. I know my 14GT had massive wheel hop, none in the RS3, spinning of tires are harder to feel because your way past the squeal and the exhaust note is so loud it can be hard to tell how much spin you had. I jump on mine after shifting to second gear and left two nice tire marks. Just my opinion.
The following users liked this post:
my89foxbody (11/20/22)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
ssjbuu
Repair and Service Help
6
8/28/15 08:55 AM
09-gt/cs
05-09 Exterior Modifications
1
8/2/15 10:08 AM
MADSCOTSMAN
2010-2014 Mustang
0
7/22/15 04:57 PM
Ecostang
Introductions
5
7/11/15 09:06 AM



Quick Reply: Did anyone else read the Car and Driver review of the 2014 RS3 in the Nov 2013 Issue?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:28 AM.