Rocket City Mustang Club Huntsville, Alabama Chapter of The Mustang Club of America

Ford and Mustang Trivia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #721  
Leroy's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
No sir.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #722  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
1955 with a 272 CI V8 ?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 07:18 AM
  #723  
Leroy's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
It appears I may have read my source incorrectly. This entire question was vague. Pardon my learning curve. I didn't think about the Sunliner.

I was looking for 1966 when the Fairlane was revised. Engine I was looking for was the 289.

mgreene, you're up since you said 1955 first.

Last edited by Leroy; Apr 22, 2008 at 07:27 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 08:13 AM
  #724  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
Originally Posted by Leroy
It appears I may have read my source incorrectly. This entire question was vague. Pardon my learning curve. I didn't think about the Sunliner.

I was looking for 1966 when the Fairlane was revised. Engine I was looking for was the 289.

mgreene, you're up since you said 1955 first.

It's OK! We all do it once in a while. God knows I have.

Sorry for using your name in vain, Mgreene heehee
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #725  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Also, the 289 was still available in 1967 Fairlanes...

Next question:

1968 Cobra Jet Mustangs (including GT-500KRs) had a small delay mechanism wired into the ignition system. What was the function of this piece?

Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #726  
Leroy's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
'K' code 289 is the engine I was looking for. See, vague.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #727  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Ah, but the K Code 289 WAS still available in 1967. That was the standard engine in all 1967 GT350 cars. And 470ish non Shelby Mustangs came with it too in 1967.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #728  
Leroy's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
I was referring to Fairlanes though. That'll teach me to read a little more.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:21 AM
  #729  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland




Originally Posted by mgreene
Also, the 289 was still available in 1967 Fairlanes...

Next question:

1968 Cobra Jet Mustangs (including GT-500KRs) had a small delay mechanism wired into the ignition system. What was the function of this piece?

Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:23 AM
  #730  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
The purpose of this solid state relay was to prevent reengagement of the starter within 4 seconds of any failed attempt to start the engine. The intent was to prevent damage to the starter drive and the flywheel/flexplate by allowing the engine to come to a complete stop before the starter could be used again.

How 'bout them apples! Just about when it was time to give up to the master! Bingo!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #731  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
runningwild is correct again! And just to give you some idea about the rarity of this piece - the reproductions list for $1400+ !!!

Last edited by mgreene; Apr 22, 2008 at 11:36 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #732  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
Originally Posted by mgreene
runningwild is correct again! And just to give you some idea about the rarity of this piece - the reproductions list for $1400+ !!!
Thanks, sometimes using the right Boolean search string helps
I guess finding an original might delay retirement???

Last edited by runningwild4.6; Apr 22, 2008 at 12:46 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #733  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
On the topic of Cobra jet motors...The 428 CJ and SCJ blocks were catagorized during manufacturing as being either a red or blue block.

What did they mean by "RED or BLUE" ? What was it referencing???
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #734  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Another good question. I'll let someone else take a shot...
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 02:10 PM
  #735  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
Originally Posted by mgreene
Another good question. I'll let someone else take a shot...

I know you know this. I was getting out of my element with all those SVT and Fox body questions.
This is like playing UNO!! Our control this time
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2008 | 06:15 PM
  #736  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
It was code for the assembly line workers to allow them to choose the correct piston to fit for each block based on bore /machining tolerances. There were two part number applications (corresponding to red/blue sizes) for each weight of piston (CJ, SCJ, etc.)
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 07:10 AM
  #737  
runningwild4.6's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2007
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
From: Central Maryland
Originally Posted by mgreene
It was code for the assembly line workers to allow them to choose the correct piston to fit for each block based on bore /machining tolerances. There were two part number applications (corresponding to red/blue sizes) for each weight of piston (CJ, SCJ, etc.)

You are 100% correct! Here's your reward, King for the day!
You're up!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 11:38 AM
  #738  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
OK, here's a racing related one: In the 1969-70 NASCAR seasons, the so called "Aero Warriors" were fielded by the Ford and Chrysler teams. Which were more successful - the Talladega Torino and Mercury Cyclone Spoiler II or the Daytona Dodge and Plymouth Superbird?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #739  
Bigred15's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2008
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
I had some trouble finding info on the 70 season. I do know that Ford dominated the 69 season, winning 29 of 102 Grand National Titles. I would have to guess that they dominated the 70 season as well.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #740  
mgreene's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
If you look here : http://aerowarriors.com/nawtables.html

You can see that Ford Torino Talladegas won 29, Mercury Cyclone Spoiler II won 8.

The Daytona Dodge only won 6 and the Superbird won 8.

So it was FoMoCo 37, Chrysler 14! And you usually only hear about how great the "wing" cars were...
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:54 PM.