GT500's REAL Horsepower
1/18/06, 06:53 PM
#121
Bullitt Member
Join Date: April 18, 2005
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AnotherMustangMan@January 18, 2006, 2:51 PM
This really is good stuff, there is no way Chevy or Chrysler are going to touch this.
(unless they drop the C/Rs of their engines, forge internals, and go the forced induction route as well--but for some reason that strikes me as unlikely.)
And even though these are pre-production, non-emissions tested cars, the hardware is there. Getting the numbers you want won't be hard.
This really is good stuff, there is no way Chevy or Chrysler are going to touch this.
(unless they drop the C/Rs of their engines, forge internals, and go the forced induction route as well--but for some reason that strikes me as unlikely.)
And even though these are pre-production, non-emissions tested cars, the hardware is there. Getting the numbers you want won't be hard.
1/18/06, 07:30 PM
#122
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by mrsuds@January 18, 2006, 8:46 PM
The gas guzzler tax is not a function of HP but a combination of gas mileage. It a complicated formula that takes into account city mileage and highway mileage, and the airspeed of an unladed sparrow heading north in a southbound wind.
The gas guzzler tax is not a function of HP but a combination of gas mileage. It a complicated formula that takes into account city mileage and highway mileage, and the airspeed of an unladed sparrow heading north in a southbound wind.
1/18/06, 07:35 PM
#123
Member
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shifty@January 18, 2006, 9:56 PM
Ever heard of the blue devil project by chevy? I drive a ford but, boosted LS7>*.
Ever heard of the blue devil project by chevy? I drive a ford but, boosted LS7>*.
The blue devil is slated to get the LS9. A less stroked/poked LS motor with 6.2L of displacement. It will be a $100K car.
1/18/06, 07:36 PM
#124
Member
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mrsuds@January 18, 2006, 9:46 PM
The gas guzzler tax is not a function of HP but a combination of gas mileage. It a complicated formula that takes into account city mileage and highway mileage, and the airspeed of an unladed sparrow heading north in a southbound wind.
The gas guzzler tax is not a function of HP but a combination of gas mileage. It a complicated formula that takes into account city mileage and highway mileage, and the airspeed of an unladed sparrow heading north in a southbound wind.
LOL.
1/18/06, 07:46 PM
#125
Member
Join Date: December 31, 2005
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by bob@January 18, 2006, 10:33 PM
But is that a european or african swallow, and what is your favorite color!
But is that a european or african swallow, and what is your favorite color!
I like White/blue stripes, Red/white stripes, tungsten/silver stripes, Valencia/silver stripes, Blue/White Stripes, what other color combos are out there??
1/18/06, 07:57 PM
#126
They have both 5.4L motors on display at NAIAS if anyone wants to see the difference between the Ford GT and GT500 motors. The only differences I noticed were the belts/pullies and the blowers. The blower on the GT engine sat almost 3" higher than the one on the GT500 motor.
Take that into account and it shouldn't surprise you that the GT500 can put out 500+hp.
FYI... That motor is sexy.
Take that into account and it shouldn't surprise you that the GT500 can put out 500+hp.
FYI... That motor is sexy.
1/18/06, 08:33 PM
#128
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by AFBLUE@January 18, 2006, 9:11 PM
I would be surprisesd if there wasn't a gas guzzler tax on the GT500. The new GTO has one (or it did when it first came out).
I would be surprisesd if there wasn't a gas guzzler tax on the GT500. The new GTO has one (or it did when it first came out).
1/18/06, 08:55 PM
#130
Join Date: July 12, 2004
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read all of this great info until I came to the debate on crunching numbers for the flywheel hp. With this kind of power, who cares. It's going to be a monster and everyone will wish they had one.
1/18/06, 08:59 PM
#131
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TheMustangSource@January 18, 2006, 9:49 AM
A stock GT500 dynoed at 489 rwhp.
A stock GT500 dynoed at 489 rwhp.
Brad, you just made my month! Now I just need the car to make my year!
1/18/06, 10:19 PM
#132
Bullitt Member
Join Date: September 25, 2004
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TheMustangSource@January 18, 2006, 9:49 AM
A stock GT500 dynoed at 489 rwhp.
A stock GT500 dynoed at 489 rwhp.
1/18/06, 10:33 PM
#133
Legacy TMS Member
Join Date: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But it is easier to understanding how it can get that high if they are dyno'ing near the 550+ right now.
Before some people were saying no way that it can't jump that high, now that we know they are way underrated it makes more sense.
Before some people were saying no way that it can't jump that high, now that we know they are way underrated it makes more sense.
1/19/06, 05:40 AM
#135
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by StangFreak@January 18, 2006, 10:45 PM
Dynoed at 489 rwhp. Hmm, that ought to be more than enough to open up a large can of whoop butt on my loud mouth neighbor and his C6 Vette.
Here little Chevy,
wn3d: 
Dynoed at 489 rwhp. Hmm, that ought to be more than enough to open up a large can of whoop butt on my loud mouth neighbor and his C6 Vette.
Here little Chevy,
wn3d: 
1/19/06, 05:46 AM
#136
Closet American
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by crazyhorse@January 18, 2006, 1:11 PM
It doesn't really matter as Scothew said. The difference will probably not be that noticeable. At least not by the seat of our pants. Both are monster numbers. Holy Poo, this car is gonna be fast.
It doesn't really matter as Scothew said. The difference will probably not be that noticeable. At least not by the seat of our pants. Both are monster numbers. Holy Poo, this car is gonna be fast.
GODZILLA
1/19/06, 06:07 AM
#137
Legacy TMS Member
Originally posted by BC_Shelby@January 19, 2006, 6:49 AM
Holy Poo is right. I think I've decided on a name for my Shelby:
GODZILLA
Holy Poo is right. I think I've decided on a name for my Shelby:
GODZILLA
1/19/06, 05:12 PM
#140
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: January 1, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While this is all great news, isn't this car going to weight close to the same as the outgoing Excursion. In fact, who else thinks that this all may just be a marketing ploy to promote a re-skinned excursion (aka Shelby GT500)!!!!
Seriously, what are we looking at, 4500 pounds, w/o driver??!!
Thats not Tokyo sized...would this thing even be able to get up and waddle out of the way of a lumbering giant gila monster????
Seriously, what are we looking at, 4500 pounds, w/o driver??!!
Thats not Tokyo sized...would this thing even be able to get up and waddle out of the way of a lumbering giant gila monster????