2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Oil separators and fate...(JLT vs Bob's vs Moroso)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/13/14, 08:50 AM
  #21  
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by Gabe
No. That's not engine oil. It's the moisture being filtered out of the oily air circulating through the engine. And no, it's not something you'd pour into your oil. It's a thinner fluid than oil, it's a byproduct of the combustion process that gets suspended in the air in the engine
That's very interesting Gabe… So if it's not engine oil, oil doesn't just materialize out of thin air. There has to be a source. So if it's recirculating inside, and it's from moisture, where is it really coming from?

This is very interesting pop corn material… I love learning new things.
Old 6/13/14, 09:10 AM
  #22  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Gabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 5,282
Received 545 Likes on 425 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
That's very interesting Gabe… So if it's not engine oil, oil doesn't just materialize out of thin air. There has to be a source. So if it's recirculating inside, and it's from moisture, where is it really coming from?

This is very interesting pop corn material… I love learning new things.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/positi...ion-system.htm

"... A mixture of air and gasoline is pumped through a system of tubes called the intake manifold through each cylinder's intake valve (or valves), where a spark from a spark plug causes the mixture to explode in the open space at the top of the cylinder called the combustion chamber.
...
a certain amount of that mixture of air and gasoline is pulled down by the piston and slips through the piston rings into the crankcase, which is the protective cover that insulates the crankshaft. This escaping gas is called blow-by and it's unavoidable."
Old 6/13/14, 09:12 AM
  #23  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Gabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 5,282
Received 545 Likes on 425 Posts
So like I said above, it's not oil that gets collected in the catch can.
It's liquefied hydrocarbons from the blow-by that's in the crankcase air being pumped through the PCV system.
Old 6/13/14, 09:21 AM
  #24  
Bullitt Member
 
mfc133's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 27, 2012
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by silverstate777
Zto5,
I have an extra JLT (black) passenger side separator you can have for the cost of shipping. Fits 2011-14 mustang GT. Check your PM's
If Zto5 doesn't pick this up I'd be interested. PM me a price if you want.
Old 6/13/14, 09:31 AM
  #25  
V6 Member
 
RacerX27's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 9, 2013
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not seeing the benefit of a catch can.

So on average if it catches 1 oz of oil in 1000 miles, @20 miles to the gallon you'll pull about 6,400 oz of fuel thru the intake.

I think this catch can thing is crazy talk. "The oil is bad and has to be stopped" and some of the same folks that have a catch can think the CAI stock is spot on and perfect.

I lol at alot of you guys.
Old 6/13/14, 09:51 AM
  #26  
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by Gabe
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/positi...ion-system.htm "... A mixture of air and gasoline is pumped through a system of tubes called the intake manifold through each cylinder's intake valve (or valves), where a spark from a spark plug causes the mixture to explode in the open space at the top of the cylinder called the combustion chamber. ... a certain amount of that mixture of air and gasoline is pulled down by the piston and slips through the piston rings into the crankcase, which is the protective cover that insulates the crankshaft. This escaping gas is called blow-by and it's unavoidable."
Originally Posted by Gabe
So like I said above, it's not oil that gets collected in the catch can. It's liquefied hydrocarbons from the blow-by that's in the crankcase air being pumped through the PCV system.
Gabe thank you for the educational read. I appreciate it.

Originally Posted by RacerX27
I'm not seeing the benefit of a catch can. So on average if it catches 1 oz of oil in 1000 miles, @20 miles to the gallon you'll pull about 6,400 oz of fuel thru the intake. I think this catch can thing is crazy talk. "The oil is bad and has to be stopped" and some of the same folks that have a catch can think the CAI stock is spot on and perfect. I lol at alot of you guys.
I don't know enough to disagree with you. I'm on the road to getting educated however

What I do know, is all the tuners and performance installers, esp of superchargers and turbochargers, is that it's not as crucial to have it on NA engines. On an FI engine though, it's imperative. Reasons are due to increased compression, octane levels, etc. How much truth there is to that, I don't know. Like I said, I'm learning.

One thing can be certain though...putting a catch can on the car is NOT a bad thing correct? Consider me the "fool" who spent 115 bucks to be "safe".
Old 6/13/14, 10:10 AM
  #27  
Bullitt Member
 
mfc133's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 27, 2012
Location: Perkasie, PA
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
What I do know, is all the tuners and performance installers, esp of superchargers and turbochargers, is that it's not as crucial to have it on NA engines. On an FI engine though, it's imperative. Reasons are due to increased compression, octane levels, etc. How much truth there is to that, I don't know. Like I said, I'm learning
Z you're definitely right, they're all but required on a FI car. And now Ford Racing says the blow-by is the #1 cause of pinging on their ProCal tunes. They actually recommend running an oil separator in their published instruction sheet.
Old 6/13/14, 11:23 AM
  #28  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Gabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 5,282
Received 545 Likes on 425 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
Gabe thank you for the educational read. I appreciate it.
...
You're welcome


I, for one, can't wait to get oil separators installed on my car, and most likely on the girlfriend's GT500 as well.

Just need the right deal
Old 6/13/14, 11:34 AM
  #29  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Got an email from Bob's that the standard kits are on back order but in production this week, so it will ship out next week instead of this week. I don't have my car, so that's okay with me. I'm glad they told me asap versus waiting. Little hiccup, but so far their CS is still 10/10 so far...
Old 6/13/14, 01:14 PM
  #30  
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by mfc133
Z you're definitely right, they're all but required on a FI car. And now Ford Racing says the blow-by is the #1 cause of pinging on their ProCal tunes. They actually recommend running an oil separator in their published instruction sheet.
That is VERY interesting to know. So good thing we're doing all the right things. So far, I've put 1k miles since my Maggie upgrade. I hope in that 1k, nothing catastrophic due to blow-by has gotten through Lol...

Originally Posted by Gabe
You're welcome


I, for one, can't wait to get oil separators installed on my car, and most likely on the girlfriend's GT500 as well.

Just need the right deal
Gabe, don't wait too long. Why not the Moroso or Bob's?

Originally Posted by laserred38
Got an email from Bob's that the standard kits are on back order but in production this week, so it will ship out next week instead of this week. I don't have my car, so that's okay with me. I'm glad they told me asap versus waiting. Little hiccup, but so far their CS is still 10/10 so far...
Patrick... thanks for info. So I will probably have to wait before I get mine too?
Old 6/13/14, 10:52 PM
  #31  
Member
 
SGM SCOTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 24, 2014
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So is the basic 2011+ 5.0 passenger side oil separator for $115 bucks all I need?

p
Originally Posted by FromZto5
That is VERY interesting to know. So good thing we're doing all the right things. So far, I've put 1k miles since my Maggie upgrade. I hope in that 1k, nothing catastrophic due to blow-by has gotten through Lol...



Gabe, don't wait too long. Why not the Moroso or Bob's?



Patrick... thanks for info. So I will probably have to wait before I get mine too?
Old 6/14/14, 01:41 AM
  #32  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by SGM SCOTT
So is the basic 2011+ 5.0 passenger side oil separator for $115 bucks all I need? p
That's the gist of what Bob's told me...
Old 6/14/14, 06:45 AM
  #33  
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Still debating... Moroso or bobs. Hmmm.

I also bought that used jlt off of john. Too good a deal to pass up. Will use as a spare or take the connectors off for use with my bobs
Old 6/14/14, 07:19 AM
  #34  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Gabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 5,282
Received 545 Likes on 425 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
Still debating... Moroso or bobs. Hmmm.

I also bought that used jlt off of john. Too good a deal to pass up. Will use as a spare or take the connectors off for use with my bobs
Will this JLT conversion kit work with the Magnuson?

http://jlttruecoldair.com/ZenCart/in...roducts_id=625
Old 6/14/14, 10:07 AM
  #35  
GT Member
 
BBM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RacerX27
I'm not seeing the benefit of a catch can.

So on average if it catches 1 oz of oil in 1000 miles, @20 miles to the gallon you'll pull about 6,400 oz of fuel thru the intake.

I think this catch can thing is crazy talk. "The oil is bad and has to be stopped" and some of the same folks that have a catch can think the CAI stock is spot on and perfect.

I lol at alot of you guys.
I installed a separator yesterday in advance of my Trackey because of this from Ford Racing Trackey FAQ.

"What if a customer complains about excessive pinging?
• Verify that only 91 or higher octane fuel is in the fuel tank.
• Verify coolant mixture is at least 50% water.
• Verify that oil consumption is not excessive. If it is, there may be oil in the intake
manifold which is causing the pinging. This is by far the most common cause of reported pinging concerns.
Suggest the use of an oil separator in the PCV line between the passenger side valve cover and the air inlet tube."


I have no idea how they quantify Excessive Oil Consumption however I see no harm in installing a separator and eliminating the possibility of detonation caused by not having one.
Cheap insurance in my opinion.

EDIT:
Just noticed mfc133 mentioned this in post #27 above.

Last edited by BBM3; 6/14/14 at 10:12 AM.
Old 6/14/14, 04:38 PM
  #36  
Mach 1 Member
 
lakeguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd like to add a little bit of first hand experience to this thread. I got my car today, brand new bone-stock GT 6-speed. Was sitting at EXACTLY 25 kms when I pulled into my garage. Here's some photos of the PCV connector when I pulled it off to install my Moroso can.

Name:  IMG_20140614_173140_zpshvudugsi.jpg
Views: 1122
Size:  81.9 KB

Name:  IMG_20140614_173144_zpshzafa7v0.jpg
Views: 1145
Size:  109.0 KB

It's a little tough to see, but after 25 kms (~15 miles) of very light driving (pouring rain today, I babied this thing home) there's a small puddle in the connector.

I understand that these cars do produce a little more through the PCV during break-in, and it'll subside over time, but that seems like a lot to me, too much not to have a separator on it.
Old 6/14/14, 05:48 PM
  #37  
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by Gabe
Will this JLT conversion kit work with the Magnuson? http://jlttruecoldair.com/ZenCart/in...roducts_id=625
Gabe... I think the stock jlt passenger side should work with the Maggie...since the Maggie kit calls for an exact reuse of the stock pcv passenger line. The roush and whipple blowers have the pcv connection towards the firewall. The Maggie is almost at the same spot as stock, towards the front.

Originally Posted by BBM3
I installed a separator yesterday in advance of my Trackey because of this from Ford Racing Trackey FAQ. "What if a customer complains about excessive pinging? • Verify that only 91 or higher octane fuel is in the fuel tank. • Verify coolant mixture is at least 50% water. • Verify that oil consumption is not excessive. If it is, there may be oil in the intake manifold which is causing the pinging. This is by far the most common cause of reported pinging concerns. Suggest the use of an oil separator in the PCV line between the passenger side valve cover and the air inlet tube." I have no idea how they quantify Excessive Oil Consumption however I see no harm in installing a separator and eliminating the possibility of detonation caused by not having one. Cheap insurance in my opinion. EDIT: Just noticed mfc133 mentioned this in post #27 above.
Wow... If ford racing itself recommending an oil separator, I can't see why installing one is a bad idea.

Originally Posted by lakeguy77
I'd like to add a little bit of first hand experience to this thread. I got my car today, brand new bone-stock GT 6-speed. Was sitting at EXACTLY 25 kms when I pulled into my garage. Here's some photos of the PCV connector when I pulled it off to install my Moroso can. It's a little tough to see, but after 25 kms (~15 miles) of very light driving (pouring rain today, I babied this thing home) there's a small puddle in the connector. I understand that these cars do produce a little more through the PCV during break-in, and it'll subside over time, but that seems like a lot to me, too much not to have a separator on it.
Thank you for that insight... Now I know I have 8000miles worth of puddling in my pcv lines . Better late than never I guess
Old 6/14/14, 06:30 PM
  #38  
Mach 1 Member
 
lakeguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FromZto5
Thank you for that insight... Now I know I have 8000miles worth of puddling in my pcv lines . Better late than never I guess
Honestly, I'm a touch concerned about the amount that was in there, but not raising the red flags just yet. Going to monitor it over the next 1500 kms or so and empty the can on a regular basis and see how much I get out of it.
Old 6/14/14, 06:38 PM
  #39  
Mach 1 Member
 
lakeguy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should also add...you being supercharged and as I recall you were disappointed in your numbers...could there be a degree or two of timing in that thing with a cleaned up intake/PCV system?
Old 6/14/14, 07:31 PM
  #40  
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
 
FromZto5's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Received 172 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by lakeguy77
Should also add...you being supercharged and as I recall you were disappointed in your numbers...could there be a degree or two of timing in that thing with a cleaned up intake/PCV system?
Nah... It was low due to lack of skill of the dyno operator and conditions. I was heat soaked during his one of 4 "test runs" before I even started my 3 "real" runs, within 15 minutes. and his correction factors were way off. I'm getting dyno'd again correctly from a more reputable location.


Quick Reply: Oil separators and fate...(JLT vs Bob's vs Moroso)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 PM.