2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

MT82: Anyone else have a sense of impending doom?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 11:41 AM
  #61  
MRGTX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
Originally Posted by PolishAmericanMustang
YOU are the one who created a thread that has no value, and only contributes to the mass hysteria that exists on other forums and I'M the one who needs to quit *****ing? Riiiight...

In your first post you basically said that you're looking for problems that aren't there. You didn't say you had problems, only that you are actively looking for them. That isn't normal. You know what they say about self-fulling prophecies...if you believe in it enough, it just might come true.

Nobody is denying legitimate problems exists. Ford should step up and take care of these people. But there's simply too much unwarranted hysteria out there and this thread is a perfect example.

I (or anyone else) am completely within my rights to ask the question. If you can't tolerate that, what the hell are you doing on the discussion forum?

Second, there are many reports coming in. You have your reasons for writing them off as coming from lesser humans who have "no business" owning these cars. I am not so quick to discount them and I don't hold the science of manual transmission operation in such high esteem to think that only a small group of elite drivers are qualified to operate them.

Third, Ford is offering no fixes on this issue and people who have had their cars attended to under their warranty are finding no resolution.

Fourth, you think you're smart enough to diagnose what these other people are experiencing with their gearboxes without coming within 100 feet of their cars?

Now... this kind of thing is getting press:
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co.../photo_01.html

I appreciate your opinion...just not the manner in which you see fit to deliver it.

Last edited by MRGTX; Apr 21, 2011 at 11:50 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:20 PM
  #62  
way2qk4u2c's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
that would be a nice upgrade for the trans when im due for a clutch... me like this
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:29 PM
  #63  
FCMalie's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 19, 2010
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Currently in Baghdad
Originally Posted by way2qk4u2c
that would be a nice upgrade for the trans when im due for a clutch... me like this
I agree, MT problems or not I eventually plan on going FI and at that point replace the clutch. Might as well replace the tranny too.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 12:33 PM
  #64  
PolishAmericanMustang's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: The South Carolina Lowcountry
Originally Posted by MRGTX
I (or anyone else) am completely within my rights to ask the question. If you can't tolerate that, what the hell are you doing on the discussion forum?

Second, there are many reports coming in. You have your reasons for writing them off as coming from lesser humans who have "no business" owning these cars. I am not so quick to discount them and I don't hold the science of manual transmission operation in such high esteem to think that only a small group of elite drivers are qualified to operate them.

Third, Ford is offering no fixes on this issue and people who have had their cars attended to under their warranty are finding no resolution.

Fourth, you think you're smart enough to diagnose what these other people are experiencing with their gearboxes without coming within 100 feet of their cars?

Now... this kind of thing is getting press:
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co.../photo_01.html

I appreciate your opinion...just not the manner in which you see fit to deliver it.
Don't you see that you've answered your own questions and proven how ridiculous it was to start this thread in the first place? No one can diagnose people's cars over a forum. These discussions are totally useless. Instead of making hysteria threads like this, people should be working with the dealers or Ford directly. AFM should close their stupid thread, but they're getting lots of clicks from all over the web = ad $$$$$. It's like a traffic jam due to a little fender bender.

I can't stress this enough, there are 6-figure views and three thousand posts in a thread that is being perpetuated by literally a handful of people. There is nothing that you can extrapolate from it. It's scientifically and mathematically useless. It does not prove that the MT-82 is a completely flawed piece, as so many are trying to say.

I'm not here to be a Ford stooge or defend them. But just like I can't say that the MT-82 is deeply flawed in terms of the design/manufacture, you also can't say that all of the vague "rough shifting" comments aren't due to stupid, whiny owners who don't know how to drive their cars.

It's all been taken to a level where it didn't need to go. You don't even have a problem with you MT-82, right? So why start a thread like this? It's basically trolling. Sure you can say whatever you want, but no one ever said all threads/posts are of equal value and quality!

As an excited soon-to-be GT owner, I posted in this thread to fight the onslaught of ignorance and needless panic surrounding this issue. You accomplished nothing by starting this thread other than contributing to that panic and ignorance. Did you offer any solutions as a result of your own tinkering? No. Did you offer any inside info on a fix that might be coming from Ford? No. You've basically accomplished the equivalent of telling a child there is a monster under his bed.

See Overboost's post here, sums things up nicely:
https://themustangsource.com/f726/20...6/#post6056600

In this country, the burden of proof lies with the accuser! People are damning the MT-82 to hell just because a a few dozen people made a few thousands posts about "rough shifting" and clicked some poll options. This isn't a problem that affects all MT-82 cars, all the time. Some people have real problems. Some have problems caused by their own inability to drive properly or unrealistic expectations. Some people are actively trying to imagine problems, like you when you started this thread.

I find it all ridiculous and immature. Your thread doesn't pose a legitimate question or address some sort of real problem, at least not in a way that hasn't been done by other threads here and on other forums.

It's starting to go round and round in circles like the AFM thread, and I would like nothing more than to see this one locked and thrown away. I'm all done here.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 02:41 PM
  #65  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
You know, back when I was a member of FSC.com, I had the rear planetary gears go out in my 4L60E. How did I know? I told the guys on the forum my problems and the issues I'd had and sure as shirley that was the problem. Sometimes things can be solved on a forum.

Just throwing this in there. Not saying the MT-82's issues will be solved or that a forum will fix them or that there is a problem at all. But I'm just sayin'.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 07:14 PM
  #66  
fast1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: June 10, 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ssimaniac
I actually had a failed transmission 2 blocks down the road after I purchased the car. It was unrelated to the current rough shifting issue, but an issue nevertheless. I guess I didn't have a gear so Ford gave me a brand new transmission. So far, the issues with the rough shifting seem sporadic. Some are affected by the cold weather, others in all seasons. Ford doesn't have a fix for this.

I am not taking it in yet, but I think I will in a week or so. The issue comes and goes once the car warms up. I think my syncros are messed up because of all the cold weather grinding. I will let them repair it two more times, then I will lemon law it. I love this car, but it's a pain in the *** to have this problem. I invested at least 2k in appearance mods too. Such a waste.

I just have terrible luck with Ford vehicles.
Is this the same ssimaniac that has a 2012 boss on order if so sham on you
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #67  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
I think the worry here is that this thread is a potential prelude to an AFM style rant fest on TMS. I don't think anyone has an issue with people with real problems discussing them. That said, the thread on AFM is not what a lot of folks would consider a constructive discussion on the issue.

Thankfully, my time on this forum has shown me that what is happening on AFM is very unlikely to be tolerated here. Just my two cents.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #68  
shadowstang03gt's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: philly
Originally Posted by jsaylor
I think the worry here is that this thread is a potential prelude to an AFM style rant fest on TMS. I don't think anyone has an issue with people with real problems discussing them. That said, the thread on AFM is not what a lot of folks would consider a constructive discussion on the issue.

Thankfully, my time on this forum has shown me that what is happening on AFM is very unlikely to be tolerated here. Just my two cents.

im sorry, AFM is like hair salon. Bunch of women. I wouldnt be surpirsed if half the problem is they cant drive stick.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:38 PM
  #69  
knk11stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2010
Posts: 251
Likes: 4
From: Harrisburg,Pa.
No real impending doom for me.I'm covered 7 years-72,000 miles.Just means I'll have to wait longer before doing any performance mods.

I do have a issue with 1-2 shifts & 2-3 makes the now infamous CRUNCH noise.

I'm hoping Ford comes out with a real permanent TSB for those of us having issues.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:42 PM
  #70  
DCS's Avatar
DCS
Member
 
Joined: August 14, 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MRGTX
I (or anyone else) am completely within my rights to ask the question. If you can't tolerate that, what the hell are you doing on the discussion forum?

Second, there are many reports coming in. You have your reasons for writing them off as coming from lesser humans who have "no business" owning these cars. I am not so quick to discount them and I don't hold the science of manual transmission operation in such high esteem to think that only a small group of elite drivers are qualified to operate them.

Third, Ford is offering no fixes on this issue and people who have had their cars attended to under their warranty are finding no resolution.

Fourth, you think you're smart enough to diagnose what these other people are experiencing with their gearboxes without coming within 100 feet of their cars?

Now... this kind of thing is getting press:
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co.../photo_01.html

I appreciate your opinion...just not the manner in which you see fit to deliver it.
I hope everyone finds what they are looking for!

I'm looking for a sweet ride with miles of smiles before we part ways, her to go to one of my kids and me to go to my reward.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 08:57 PM
  #71  
TheReaper's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 27, 2007
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 26
From: Southern Al
My 6R80 is the best auto I've ever owned. It can handle any mod you throw at it. I'm just adding to the post count in this thread. I think a lot of the MT82 problems are due to drivers that are not use to driving a manual transmission.

Last edited by TheReaper; Apr 21, 2011 at 09:08 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2011 | 10:02 PM
  #72  
Itravelalot's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 4, 2010
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye, AZ
I still am waiting for my car, but since I never have driven any sticks that were all that smooth. I do not know that I need it to be like butter, although that would be nice. Half of driving a stick is getting used to your car to feel exactly how to move the clutch and the stick to have it work smoothly. Once you really know your car, you know little tricks to make it get working better. Honestly, there were a lot of other problems that were more annoying than how smoothly they shifted.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 05:24 AM
  #73  
shadowstang03gt's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: philly
Because a lot of people are new to mustangs. They probably all drove a VW, civic, or some other dumb car. Every GT shifts like ****. U gotta do a shifter and bracket. A lot of the problem is the skip shift and people not understanding it.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 10:33 AM
  #74  
jlc41's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 4, 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS
Tranny

Originally Posted by MRGTX
I (or anyone else) am completely within my rights to ask the question. If you can't tolerate that, what the hell are you doing on the discussion forum?

Second, there are many reports coming in. You have your reasons for writing them off as coming from lesser humans who have "no business" owning these cars. I am not so quick to discount them and I don't hold the science of manual transmission operation in such high esteem to think that only a small group of elite drivers are qualified to operate them.

Third, Ford is offering no fixes on this issue and people who have had their cars attended to under their warranty are finding no resolution.

Fourth, you think you're smart enough to diagnose what these other people are experiencing with their gearboxes without coming within 100 feet of their cars?

Now... this kind of thing is getting press:
http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co.../photo_01.html

I appreciate your opinion...just not the manner in which you see fit to deliver it.
+1 to this. I hope all you folks disregarding the crunchy / notchy stuborn shifting operator induced look at the above mentioned link. Maybe some understanding of what remote linkage and direct linkage and how it effects shifting occurs. The notion that because you 400 hp plus is a reason for rough shifting is simply unacceptable.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 11:00 AM
  #75  
FCMalie's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 19, 2010
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Currently in Baghdad
Originally Posted by jlc41
+1 to this. I hope all you folks disregarding the crunchy / notchy stuborn shifting operator induced look at the above mentioned link. Maybe some understanding of what remote linkage and direct linkage and how it effects shifting occurs. The notion that because you 400 hp plus is a reason for rough shifting is simply unacceptable.
Wow, a post from you that doesn't say "It's made in China it's garbage." While the fact that the transmissions have problems is fine, it's pretty obvious that some are having major issues. Direct linkage would definitely be preferred by most when adding additional power, I planned on going to a Tremec before going FI. Ford went to Getrag to attempt to get a better transmission from a company that has been building them for decades. Obviously with the issues that are coming up with some of the transmissions(some not most) this plan didn't go quite well. As for notchy shifting being acceptable, I'm sorry to ruin your hopes but it is. Grinding is completely different. This is not some luxury vehicle. Its along the same lines as high performance LCAs causing more NVH. You sacrifice comfort for performance in a transmission just like anywhere else in the vehicle.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 11:12 AM
  #76  
PolishAmericanMustang's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: The South Carolina Lowcountry
Exclamation

Originally Posted by jlc41
+1 to this. I hope all you folks disregarding the crunchy / notchy stuborn shifting operator induced look at the above mentioned link. Maybe some understanding of what remote linkage and direct linkage and how it effects shifting occurs. The notion that because you 400 hp plus is a reason for rough shifting is simply unacceptable.
You are obviously hanging around here actively looking for reasons NOT to buy a Mustang. That is a screwy approach to anything in life. Have you even test-driven a 2011-2012 GT manual? I can't believe you would let a couple of extreme cases and loud-mouthed crusaders on the INTERNET discourage you from buying this car. For every one guy SCREAMING about his MT-82, there are probably 100 too busy ENJOYING it to even consider posting in a forum!

Go buy a Honda Civic. They are "Made in USA" with lots of "Made in USA" parts content. They also have impossibly light clutches and smooth shifting.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 01:22 PM
  #77  
jlc41's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 4, 2010
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: Biloxi, MS
Yes i have test driven the 11 and I am considering buying one. So no am not looking for reason not to buy, but a fix that will make me want to buy the car. But unlike you I will not accept problems with any major componets of the car much less any thing else. It is apparent from all the postings and your acknowledgement of the issue that something is wrong but you are willing to go with it. If more buyers were to demand proper working cars many be we would not have put up with inferior products. Also knocking the competition for making a better product dosen't solve the problem. Ford needs to fix it.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 02:21 PM
  #78  
PolishAmericanMustang's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: The South Carolina Lowcountry
Originally Posted by jlc41
Yes i have test driven the 11 and I am considering buying one. So no am not looking for reason not to buy, but a fix that will make me want to buy the car. But unlike you I will not accept problems with any major componets of the car much less any thing else. It is apparent from all the postings and your acknowledgement of the issue that something is wrong but you are willing to go with it. If more buyers were to demand proper working cars many be we would not have put up with inferior products. Also knocking the competition for making a better product dosen't solve the problem. Ford needs to fix it.
Pathetic. No, I most CERTAINLY DO NOT acknowledge that this is a wide-spread issue. Some MT-82 owners have problems. Some new 485 Italias also burned to the ground, and that's a $200K Ferrari! NO example of EVERY car will be perfect. Yes, there are a few MT-82 cars out there that have problems, but most DO NOT!

You are just looking for an excuse not to buy the car, and this is as poor and weak as they come. But it's your money. Go to Camaro5 and good riddance! People like you will never be happy with anything.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #79  
shadowstang03gt's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: philly
Originally Posted by jlc41
+1 to this. I hope all you folks disregarding the crunchy / notchy stuborn shifting operator induced look at the above mentioned link. Maybe some understanding of what remote linkage and direct linkage and how it effects shifting occurs. The notion that because you 400 hp plus is a reason for rough shifting is simply unacceptable.

go buy a VW butt plug
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2011 | 02:40 PM
  #80  
JimmyM's Avatar
 
Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by shadowstang03gt
go buy a VW butt plug
Does this forum not have moderators? Just curious.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:52 PM.