JUST SAW 2010 GT500!

For everyone's sake, let's hope both parties work together so the lower income electorate feels confident enough in this economy that they can go out and buy a car ( preferably a Ford, hell I'll even throw GM or Chrysler in there ) so the car we're all so passionate about can continue to exist.
Look at what's happened to GM- they've cancelled all future product development because they are out of money-Ford is in much better shape, but let's hope that the situation doesn't fall further down to the effect of delaying or cancelling the GT500, future SEs, or a major update in 2014.
Back to topic, however, I like the Blue and Red together. But there will be plenty of other color/stripe choices I am certain. Maybe Knight or one of the other PS guys can do some other color combos....
Yep, that was the one! The red stripes were just a cheap vinyl stripe that was peeling off in someplaces.
The wheels were incredible. The hips, were underwhelming for me. Maybe without camo, they will look better. The turn signal indicators in the grill, looked good to me. I didnt like the taillights that much, but it was out of context in the manner that I saw it. Everything else was camo'ed, so all I could see was the taillights.
The added plastic on the bottom of the front fascia and along the side by the wheel well, looked good proportionately and quality-wise.
The wheels were incredible. The hips, were underwhelming for me. Maybe without camo, they will look better. The turn signal indicators in the grill, looked good to me. I didnt like the taillights that much, but it was out of context in the manner that I saw it. Everything else was camo'ed, so all I could see was the taillights.
The added plastic on the bottom of the front fascia and along the side by the wheel well, looked good proportionately and quality-wise.
Yep, that was the one! The red stripes were just a cheap vinyl stripe that was peeling off in someplaces.
The wheels were incredible. The hips, were underwhelming for me. Maybe without camo, they will look better. The turn signal indicators in the grill, looked good to me. I didnt like the taillights that much, but it was out of context in the manner that I saw it. Everything else was camo'ed, so all I could see was the taillights.
The added plastic on the bottom of the front fascia and along the side by the wheel well, looked good proportionately and quality-wise.
The wheels were incredible. The hips, were underwhelming for me. Maybe without camo, they will look better. The turn signal indicators in the grill, looked good to me. I didnt like the taillights that much, but it was out of context in the manner that I saw it. Everything else was camo'ed, so all I could see was the taillights.
The added plastic on the bottom of the front fascia and along the side by the wheel well, looked good proportionately and quality-wise.
That bulbous nose on the GT500 makes the car look very weighed down in the front. It certainly is not attractive. It makes the car look like a character for The Cars movie more than anything. The base and GT models look much better with the restrained flatter sculpted hoods.
That bulbous nose on the GT500 makes the car look very weighed down in the front. It certainly is not attractive. It makes the car look like a character for The Cars movie more than anything. The base and GT models look much better with the restrained flatter sculpted hoods.


Although, I gotta say, I didn't feel terribly juvenile owning the Mach 1 as it was a very stylish, head-turning car (at car shows and the drag strip). But, to your point, I often refer to my supercharged 07 GT as a "gentleman's musclecar."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM







