2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Base Engine for 09

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #61  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(ManEHawke @ May 3, 2006, 9:01 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Personally I wouldn't go with big bore short stroke beacuse of the rpm range. Those Indy car's are impressive, I think they are like ~200% volumetric efficient N/A, or some carzy # like that.
Strokers won't be efficient at high rpms due to all the friction & sideloading, but for a car that won't see past 6K a huge bore with short stroke would be weak.
[/b][/quote]


For almost 30 years the 289 / 302 / 5.0 engines did rather well with their large 4.0" bore and rather short 2.87 / 3.0" strokes.

I imagine there isn't a die hard Ford fan on planet Earth that woudn't give their left nut if they could magically increase the V8 Mod motor's bore from its puny 3.55" to 4.0" like the old Ford small blocks had.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 06:03 PM
  #62  
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
Cam Tease
 
Joined: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Sorry, given the choice, I think I'd keep the nut.
Reply
Old May 5, 2006 | 02:27 AM
  #63  
1trickpony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
I love the Stang but I love my nuts more. That said, I would like to larger bores on the mod motor. I loved the old 5.0 and there's still several magazines with 5.0 in the title.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
duppycat
General Mustang Chat
2
Feb 16, 2019 08:36 AM
Fedupdave42169
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
1
Oct 23, 2015 09:58 AM
mustangsally_
2010-2014 Mustang
21
Sep 18, 2015 05:35 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 PM.