2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

32 RWHP to be found with new headers on 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 09:04 AM
  #21  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Hani
Good to see such increase due to headers swap only over the already good factory ones.

I was reading one of Motor Trend issues and under the "secrets fo the 5.0" section, they highlighted how the factory headers were good compared to others.




in other words, they(stock) are about like using shorty headers. we all know what pulse tuned longtubes with merged collectors can do. especially 1 7/8" for HP and 3" collector for torque. the exhaust ports are deficient because of packaging reasons. the engineers needed round ports for the headers to work. the exhaust is where we need help.

im not sure we need larger than an 80mm throttle body. larger MAF/filter and a tune to use it plus full exhaust and VCT tuning is the key.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #22  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
others who didnt think this car will be a legend are mistaken.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2010 | 09:06 PM
  #23  
Gene K's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by assasinator
in other words, they(stock) are about like using shorty headers. we all know what pulse tuned longtubes with merged collectors can do. especially 1 7/8" for HP and 3" collector for torque. the exhaust ports are deficient because of packaging reasons. the engineers needed round ports for the headers to work. the exhaust is where we need help.

im not sure we need larger than an 80mm throttle body. larger MAF/filter and a tune to use it plus full exhaust and VCT tuning is the key.
Well we know Ford got 15 hp with development longtubes over the T-headers according to the Powertrain Engineers. How much better these headers may be and what offroad X-Pipe and straight through mufflers may be who knows. But 15 rwhp + 10 rwhp + 5 rwhp (LT + ORX + Mufflers) would not be totally out of the realm of possiblity.

I agree it needs a bigger MAF/Filter/Airbox. 800 cfm or so is just as restrictive for the 2011 5.0 as 550 cfm was on the '05 3V.

The 2011 Tune seems to be much less handicapped than the 2005. Im doubtful we will see huge gains here but every little bit helps. Mainly from a little leaner mixture + raised rpm (required for best ET's) in my opinion. Timing is likely to be closer and it appears to have less throttle rate limiting.

The stock 2011 5.0 does not use VCT at full throttle. The cam timing is locked.

Last edited by Gene K; Jun 7, 2010 at 09:13 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 09:02 PM
  #24  
TTS197's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2007
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
UPDATE*

Mods please move over to 5.0 tech




Reply
Old Jun 10, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #25  
jeff s's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2010
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Very cool...

Those are some tiny cats.

Are there only two O2 sensors on the 5.0?

No issues with them "lighting-off" being that far down the pipes?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
Rando
2010-2014 Mustang
8
Aug 25, 2021 11:12 AM
wallace
GT Performance Mods
3
Mar 29, 2016 10:09 AM
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
Oct 15, 2015 10:03 AM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 PM.