2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

The 3.5/Twinforce Mustang EXISTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 06:28 AM
  #81  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Life my internet chum is far to short to be taken so seriously I dont see where this discussion cannot combine awesome facial hair and fuel effeciency. Obviously there is a correlation between the two.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 08:17 AM
  #82  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
well if you are riding on a motorcycle, the person with the least facial hair would get better mileage. if everything else was equal.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #83  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Astute observation
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #84  
dr awesome's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
http://www.qwantz.com/fanart/DinoCom...netSerious.png

Thanks for not Banning me. ...Again.

(For future Reference, should posts have moar or Less ?)
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #85  
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
Cam Tease
 
Joined: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Knight
well if you are riding on a motorcycle, the person with the least facial hair would get better mileage. if everything else was equal.
And the person with the least ears would get even better mileage.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #86  
dr awesome's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Headless Horseman ftw?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #87  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Has anybody on this forum driven or own a MazdaSpeed6 or Lincoln MKZ?
I would like to hear some feedback on both the I4 Turbo and the 35 V6.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 12:03 PM
  #88  
Burke0011's Avatar
Big Falken Tires
 
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
Has anybody on this forum driven or own a MazdaSpeed6 or Lincoln MKZ?
I would like to hear some feedback on both the I4 Turbo and the 35 V6.
My buddy has a 2006 Mazda Speed3 - we installed a CAI and new downpipe on it recently but even stock, it is a QUICK little SOB. No apparent type of lag with throttle response - she moves
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #89  
jayguy's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas
I'm just glad the conversation hasn't migrated to hair-styles of the 70's.

Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #90  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #91  
bt4's Avatar
bt4
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2004
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
Has anybody on this forum driven or own a MazdaSpeed6 or Lincoln MKZ?
I would like to hear some feedback on both the I4 Turbo and the 35 V6.
I've driven both flavors of the MKZ. FWD and AWD. The D35 is a strong motor. In the Lincoln, it is very quiet and responsive, though not as much fun as a Mustang GT.

A curious thing to note. The FWD and AWD cars do not "feel" like the same vehicle. I expected some torque steer with the AWD model. What I got was something that was completely neutral. The steering was completely lacking in feedback from the road. It was if the steering wheel was disconnected from the front suspension. It reminded me of a Town Car, somewhat isolating the driver.

The AWD vehicle had a completely different feel. Same car, same motor, different response. There was a much more positive feedback from the steering wheel with AWD. The car felt tighter, the suspension firmer (without being harsh).

The MKZ is a very nice vehicle--luxury at a very reasonable price. The AWD cost more, (37,595 list vs 34,795 the vehicles I drove) but well worth the additional price IMO. The FWD is a car for those who are just along for the ride. The AWD is more of a driver's car.

PS

I enjoyed the THX sound system with Satellite radio--excellent option.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #92  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
Has anybody on this forum driven or own a MazdaSpeed6 or Lincoln MKZ?
I would like to hear some feedback on both the I4 Turbo and the 35 V6.
I own a Mazda CX-7 and my roomate has a Mazdaspeed 6. The I4 turbo is great motor, fast, powerful, very little lag; but it's very sensitive to reformulated gas (gas with 10% ethanol). My roomate works where they just have plain gas and we live where it has the ethanal. He gets 26 mpg on the plain gas (car is only rated at 25) but he gets 22 if he fills up around home.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #93  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Any time they substitute alcohol in the vehicle there will be a drop in fuel economy the A/F ratio for gasoline is 15:1 (well 14.7:1 actually) where ethanol requires more like 5:1 (IIRC). I think somebody said it best somewhere here or on another board. Gasoline really is a miracle fuel. Cheap and easy to produce while packing alot of energy in it to get the job done.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 10:41 AM
  #94  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by bob
Any time they substitute alcohol in the vehicle there will be a drop in fuel economy the A/F ratio for gasoline is 15:1 (well 14.7:1 actually) where ethanol requires more like 5:1 (IIRC). I think somebody said it best somewhere here or on another board. Gasoline really is a miracle fuel. Cheap and easy to produce while packing alot of energy in it to get the job done.
That's true but my V6 Mustang got 29 MPG highway (75-80mph) on that crappy gas. And it's EPA rating was only 29. And they only go a max of 60mph for that rating.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #95  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by AWmustang
That's true but my V6 Mustang got 29 MPG highway (75-80mph) on that crappy gas. And it's EPA rating was only 29. And they only go a max of 60mph for that rating.
all the stations around me are 10% ethanol as well and i always get the advertised rating or better.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 12:37 AM
  #96  
108845793's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: June 21, 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Nice!

Nice!

Originally Posted by MSP
Any Mustang with this engine in the engine bay will be so bad azz its ridiculous.. Supports 400HP on E85 and 600HP on gasoline!!

WOW!!

http://www.automk.com/thread-45915-1-1.html

Reply
Old Jun 21, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #97  
kevinb120's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,730
Likes: 3
Pretty cool stuff.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 06:46 AM
  #98  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by MSP
Any Mustang with this engine in the engine bay will be so bad azz its ridiculous.. Supports 400HP on E85 and 600HP on gasoline!!

WOW!!

http://www.automk.com/thread-45915-1-1.html

Quote from the link above: There's no word yet as to whether the new motor can take advantage of the superior knock resistance of ethanol to provide a horsepower bump, but this seems like an ideal platform on which to roll out such a feature. The horsepower junkies among us might also want to consider that an injector sized to flow enough E85 for 400 HP will probably support at least 600 HP on gasoline. END QUOTE

First they say that ethanol's superior knock resistance might allow for a HP bump, then they say 400 on ethanol and 600 on gas.

Am I the only one confused by this?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #99  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
If its reliable, I am sold!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #100  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by AWmustang
First they say that ethanol's superior knock resistance might allow for a HP bump, then they say 400 on ethanol and 600 on gas.

Am I the only one confused by this?
It does seem funny as you read it but it is true becasue...

Ethanol requires a larger injecter since the air/fuel ration needs to be more rich. so if you take that injector size and use gas it could do more hp...

But Ethanol takes better to boost since its equivilent octane rating is about 105. So it has the potential for higher boost and allows higher hp.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.