2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2011 5.0 "cammed " idle...w/video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 12:25 PM
  #161  
AMChrisRose's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 24, 2010
Posts: 322
Likes: 2
From: Malvern, PA
Yes, it will be covered. You'll simply place a new free tunes for life order!
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 03:33 PM
  #162  
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Joined: April 11, 2007
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
Here's another vid showing the backfire I now have

I couldn't upload the other vid because apparently it's "file size larger than supported". I'll shoot another one later this week.


Last edited by Digital_Synapse; Mar 29, 2011 at 03:34 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 03:37 PM
  #163  
Stinger1982's Avatar
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
 
Joined: November 25, 2009
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
I dont hear a backfire in the whole video. Some fuel popping on the way down, thats just fuel in the exhaust.

Some newer Audi's have a fuel squirter in the exhaust to make this exact sound (not that loud though, but your exhaust has a lot to do with that)
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 03:42 PM
  #164  
FCMalie's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 19, 2010
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Currently in Baghdad
Sounds good to me, a bit of popping like Shaun said, but an actual backfire is a lot louder than that. You'd get the same fuel popping sounds if you were to put in actual bigger cams too.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 03:48 PM
  #165  
FastRedPonyCar's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 19, 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL
yeah sounds like typical aftermarket exhaust popping to me. quieter mufflers (gt500 for example) should greatly reduce that if it bothers you.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #166  
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Joined: April 11, 2007
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
Oh ok, good deal. Just wasn't there before the tune, was a little concerned. Im good now. Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 04:26 PM
  #167  
S197 GT's Avatar
3rd Times A Charm
 
Joined: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,459
Likes: 0
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 05:04 PM
  #168  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
Have you ever seen the amount of fuel on the ground after you rev the engine?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2011 | 05:49 PM
  #169  
Stinger1982's Avatar
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
 
Joined: November 25, 2009
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
Have you ever seen the amount of fuel on the ground after you rev the engine?
You mean water right?

Sent from my iPhone using TMS Forum
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 07:23 AM
  #170  
hawkeye18's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
Have you ever seen the amount of fuel on the ground after you rev the engine?
Lulz, that's condensed water, dude.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 08:51 AM
  #171  
ShaneGT's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2011
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 2
From: Houma, Louisiana
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
Have you ever seen the amount of fuel on the ground after you rev the engine?
black soot is unburnt fuel.. any liquids is water
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 09:38 AM
  #172  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
Sorry dudes the tune still runs like ****.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 10:18 AM
  #173  
FCMalie's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 19, 2010
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Currently in Baghdad
Pretty sure the only people that are having any issues with the tunes are ones with Autos, it affects the driveability at low rpms. A lot of people have been happy with their tune so far though.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 10:55 AM
  #174  
Stinger1982's Avatar
I am Shauny Clause
MOTM July 2010 Winner
 
Joined: November 25, 2009
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
the other thing is cars with real big cams have low rpm driveablility concerns, so its not like the tune is causing problems that dont already exist in the big cam world
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 11:00 AM
  #175  
ShaneGT's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2011
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 2
From: Houma, Louisiana
ill end up getting bama's when they release it and just have it to play with, reminds me, i need to get off this 91 octane tune.. we have 93 in louisiana... lol... why did i ask for 91 in the first place...
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #176  
hawkeye18's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by Stinger1982
the other thing is cars with real big cams have low rpm driveablility concerns, so its not like the tune is causing problems that dont already exist in the big cam world
This. Low RPM bucking with an automatic isn't a fault of the tune; it is the tune. When the engine is loping due to either overlapping cams or cams that are forced to overlap, as is with the tune, power delivery will be very choppy.

Basically, f*cking deal with it. If you want lopey cams, you have to deal with the downsides of lopey cams, which are low RPM drivability issues. Everybody with actual lopey cams will tell you the same thing, that drivability is **** at low RPMs with them.

Some of you all amaze me, asking for a specific feature, then complaining about that specific feature!
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #177  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
At least with real cams you gain power. The lopey cam idle tune in the auto seemed to lose power even though they say it does not. I have the Lund Aggressive tune and it is way more powerful than his idle lope tune. So i guess if you are just looking for the sound and do not care about the drivability and power this tune is for you. I had a big block 402 with a big cam and it never drove as ****ty as this did.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 07:43 AM
  #178  
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Joined: April 11, 2007
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
Sorry dudes the tune still runs like ****.
I have a M6 with 3.73's. The lope only kicks in below 1200 rpms, and under 15mph or so. That's basically crawling in traffic. It's pretty significant. I don't DD my car, so I'm never in daytime traffic. I also work nights so when I take my car to work, there are no other cars. The only time I crawl through the gears with my stang is in the parking complex at work where I obey the 10mph signs. I hate people who speed through parking lots. So the car is very responsive to throttle position, no more lag at all...that said, little twitches in my feet on the pedal that didnt do anything before cause the car to buck hard now when crawling. I was told this isn't a daily driven tune. I can always load the 93 race tune without the cams sound if I wanted. Like I said, it isnt a problem for me. If you DD your car, and you spend more than 10min in traffic, maybe this isnt for you. I wouldn't use it in heavy traffic.
Originally Posted by hawkeye18
This. Low RPM bucking with an automatic isn't a fault of the tune; it is the tune. When the engine is loping due to either overlapping cams or cams that are forced to overlap, as is with the tune, power delivery will be very choppy.

Basically, f*cking deal with it. If you want lopey cams, you have to deal with the downsides of lopey cams, which are low RPM drivability issues. Everybody with actual lopey cams will tell you the same thing, that drivability is **** at low RPMs with them.
^this.
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
At least with real cams you gain power. The lopey cam idle tune in the auto seemed to lose power even though they say it does not. I have the Lund Aggressive tune and it is way more powerful than his idle lope tune. So i guess if you are just looking for the sound and do not care about the drivability and power this tune is for you.
I am trying to load my car on a dyno this week to get those numbers.

Originally Posted by FCMalie
Pretty sure the only people that are having any issues with the tunes are ones with Autos, it affects the driveability at low rpms. A lot of people have been happy with their tune so far though.
Nope, I got a M6 with 3.73's. My car also has a mind of her own.

Last edited by Digital_Synapse; Apr 1, 2011 at 08:01 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #179  
pony racer's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 21, 2010
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: Bridgeport, Ct
OT..

Shaun, sent you a PM.. not sure if they are going out.. get back to me

back on topic..
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #180  
SurfnSoCal's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
Any update from AM/Bama on an ETA?
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 AM.