Dude you still don't get it. No we weren't discussing sports cars, we were talking engine size and power. Also FYI: the Mustang is not a sports car, even in GT500 form.
Who was talking about 0-60 with the Sonata? I was talking about the POWER of the engine for it's displacement, thought that was obviously clear from the painfully long descriptions stating that in my posts.
When are you going to understand?
It's 3.3 liter several years ago had 30 hp more than the Mustang's 4.0 liter V6 did in 2010. That's the point, period.
But it was funny that you took the time to look up the acceleration times of the old Sonata to compare it to the Mustang 4.0 even though I was clearly not talking about acceleration times.

We aren't and never were discussing HP per dollar or performance in different classes of cars like you continually keep bringing up, we were talking about ENGINE displacement and power per liter. That's not hard to understand.
BTW, even though you stated in the post above you only read part of my post, I knew, without a doubt, you read the whole thing right from the get go.
I'm way ahead of you kid.
Done? Lord I hope so. This is tiring.

 

Ok Driver, whatever man. I see your point of view, I just don't agree with it. It's not that big a deal really.

 

Cool, over and out man.

 

Three pages worth of 'not a big deal'.

Couldn't help myself.

 

HEY! stop writing such long posts! I hate reading!

anywho

most of the motor listed above like I said do not make that much torq. I said nothing about the other motors out in the market place.

 

also the v6 stang is a DD. I do not really see it as a sports car. I think that makes this silly fight about four liters boring and over.