Motor Trend 3 row crossover comparison test
#1
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Motor Trend 3 row crossover comparison test
Not what I've expected.
Explorer finished dead last even against "older" crossovers like Mazda CX-9, Chevrolet Traverse and Honda Pilot.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._explorer.html
Explorer finished dead last even against "older" crossovers like Mazda CX-9, Chevrolet Traverse and Honda Pilot.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._explorer.html
#3
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah, MAYBE the production version will be better, but that's not a given and certainly not proven and some/many/most of the issues might still be there too as some sound not so easily resolvable as some buzzy or loose trim bits (torque steer, handling looseness, etc.).
Wonder how the Dodge would have fared with its V8? Probably top dog would be my guess.
Wonder how the Dodge would have fared with its V8? Probably top dog would be my guess.
#4
Yeah, MAYBE the production version will be better, but that's not a given and certainly not proven and some/many/most of the issues might still be there too as some sound not so easily resolvable as some buzzy or loose trim bits (torque steer, handling looseness, etc.).
Wonder how the Dodge would have fared with its V8? Probably top dog would be my guess.
Wonder how the Dodge would have fared with its V8? Probably top dog would be my guess.
#7
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Considering "unrefined chassis" and "torque steer" are their two biggest gripes, and are also two things I've not seen mentioned by any other review of a production Explorer, I think MT does its readers a disservice by doing the comparison when they did and then not stressing the Explorer's unfinished state. But they're in business to sell issues, not to be fair.
#8
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't really think what magazines write in their comparison tests have much of an impact on buyers. All magazines keep saying how much they like Flex; yet, sales are pretty low (~34,000 last year). With Taurus it's the other way around.
#10
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
Join Date: August 20, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
By definition it's also a crossover, just like the Flex and Edge. It's built on a car based platform (Taurus) as opposed to the outgoing model being built as a body on frame vehicle like a truck. The Flex doesn't work, it's really in a class of its own, maybe equal to a Pacifica if it were still being built. The Explorer really does fall in line with everything it is being put up against in this comparison. It's just too bad it was a pre-production model used and that MT didn't get to test one that was refined.
#11
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
Join Date: August 20, 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,352
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Being a print mag, this was done months and months ago. If the MT guys said "hey we're doing our first big comparo with the Explorer" and Ford didn't have any production Expys built yet, they were sort of screwed. MT wasn't going to delay to give them time, and if Ford begged off MT would hammer them in the print for "hiding" their new vehicle. So they sent what they had and crossed their fingers.
Considering "unrefined chassis" and "torque steer" are their two biggest gripes, and are also two things I've not seen mentioned by any other review of a production Explorer, I think MT does its readers a disservice by doing the comparison when they did and then not stressing the Explorer's unfinished state. But they're in business to sell issues, not to be fair.
Considering "unrefined chassis" and "torque steer" are their two biggest gripes, and are also two things I've not seen mentioned by any other review of a production Explorer, I think MT does its readers a disservice by doing the comparison when they did and then not stressing the Explorer's unfinished state. But they're in business to sell issues, not to be fair.
#12
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No doubt, but judging by the sales to date I don't think MT's article is going to slow the momentum down.
#13
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The weird thing is, earlier this year Motor Trend had Explorer vs Durango comparison.
And it was pretty much a tie (they said if you're using your head buy a Explorer; if you're using your heart buy a Durango).
Yet, 3 months later Explorer is dead last and Durango finished 2nd? Doesn't make any sense at all.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html
And it was pretty much a tie (they said if you're using your head buy a Explorer; if you're using your heart buy a Durango).
Yet, 3 months later Explorer is dead last and Durango finished 2nd? Doesn't make any sense at all.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html
#14
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This serves as a reminder as to why I cancelled my subscription to MT many years ago and to take these "rags" with a grain of salt.
The irony.....they had a poll of "which vehicle would you purchase" on page 1 and the Explorer was the top pick!!
The irony.....they had a poll of "which vehicle would you purchase" on page 1 and the Explorer was the top pick!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post