Dear FMC USA...
6/3/08, 07:46 PM
#1
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
6/4/08, 02:46 AM
#7
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Personally, I find myself hard pressed to find anything I don't like about that car., but obviously, thats just me.
You're all probably tired of hearing this because I think I've said it in most if not all threads with Falcons in them, but I'd trade my Bullitt for one of those
You're all probably tired of hearing this because I think I've said it in most if not all threads with Falcons in them, but I'd trade my Bullitt for one of those
6/4/08, 04:38 AM
#8
I too think it is a fantastic car and one would be in my driveway if it were sold in the States. And what's with the aversion towards RWD in a sedan. If executed properly (keyword) it would be a nice addition to FMC car lineup.
Last edited by Evil_Capri; 6/4/08 at 05:02 AM.
6/4/08, 09:36 AM
#9
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, Bob Lutz said you can't make RWD beat the CAFÉ tandards, and since Bob Lutz is always right, doing RWD sedans in the future (though not now, you should totally buy a G8) would be bad.
More seriously, the principle problem I have with the current Falcon is that there are other priorities rather than finding a way to import a costly, limited-market Aussie. Keeping the rest of the car lineup fresh and competetive, figuring out how to survive the doom of the SUV, rebuilding the "small" truck segment, and working on new drivetrain tech all take money that probably should be diverted to Falcon importing.
More seriously, the principle problem I have with the current Falcon is that there are other priorities rather than finding a way to import a costly, limited-market Aussie. Keeping the rest of the car lineup fresh and competetive, figuring out how to survive the doom of the SUV, rebuilding the "small" truck segment, and working on new drivetrain tech all take money that probably should be diverted to Falcon importing.
6/4/08, 10:25 AM
#10
Bullitt Member
RWD BMW's get better mileage than the FWD MKS, so does the 375 horse Hyundai Genesis.
People that think RWD means bad gas mileage don't know what they are talking about, and there's always a market for good cars, not everybody cares if it costs a few more bucks to fill their cars up anyways.
People that think RWD means bad gas mileage don't know what they are talking about, and there's always a market for good cars, not everybody cares if it costs a few more bucks to fill their cars up anyways.
6/4/08, 12:36 PM
#12
I agree with the cost and logistics involved with importing the Falcon. My comment was directed at the prospects of a new GRWD platform and the possibilities of a future FMC RWD sedan for the States.
6/5/08, 10:54 PM
#14
Team Mustang Source
6/6/08, 09:26 AM
#17
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
TMS Staff
i love that Falcon and would happily have one..gas be damned!
it's an awesome car that is stunning and I'd be all over it if i had the means
it's an awesome car that is stunning and I'd be all over it if i had the means
6/6/08, 10:47 AM
#18
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so that everyone is clear and see's the entire picture for comparisons sake:
BMW 5:
528i (3.0 I6, 230hp, RWD)= 18/28
528xi (3.0 I6, 230hp, AWD)= 17/25
535i (3.0 I6T, 300hp, RWD)= 17/26
535xi (3.0 I6T, 300hp, AWD)= 16/25
550i (V8, 360hp, RWD)= 15/22
vs.
MKS:
FWD (270hp)= 17/24
AWD (270hp)= 17/23
if ur comparing base vs base, then the 5 series is getting only slightly better mpg, i'm thinking it was a huge margin from ur statement. also note, the MKS is making more hp in base form vs the 5 series, anyway just throwing in actual EPA #'s so that everyone gets a better picture.
BMW 5:
528i (3.0 I6, 230hp, RWD)= 18/28
528xi (3.0 I6, 230hp, AWD)= 17/25
535i (3.0 I6T, 300hp, RWD)= 17/26
535xi (3.0 I6T, 300hp, AWD)= 16/25
550i (V8, 360hp, RWD)= 15/22
vs.
MKS:
FWD (270hp)= 17/24
AWD (270hp)= 17/23
if ur comparing base vs base, then the 5 series is getting only slightly better mpg, i'm thinking it was a huge margin from ur statement. also note, the MKS is making more hp in base form vs the 5 series, anyway just throwing in actual EPA #'s so that everyone gets a better picture.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hardway
2005-2009 Mustang
120
1/18/08 02:30 PM