SN95 Mustang 1994-2004 Mustangs Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

5.0 or 4.6 ?

Old Mar 17, 2007 | 04:51 PM
  #1  
Desi's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
5.0 or 4.6 ?

Hey all,

Still 'Stang shoppin & no hits yet, the fox-bodys keep shooting up around here so thought I would look around at the 94+, & they are more in my price range, anyway.. main question is....am I likely to run into any more issues with the 5.0 then say a 4.6l, I may have found a good deal on a 94GT thats been title 42'd, going to look at it later this week (&waiting for pix of it to post), but I was wondering how readily parts are for the 94/5's or if I should hold off for a '96 with the 4.6?
Yeah, run on sentences FTW!!
Thanks in advance for any tips/help =)
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 04:57 PM
  #2  
boduke0220's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2007
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 1
From: North carolina
well the 5.0 is going to give you cheaper power...parts are cheaper for it..or so i have read on here.
but look at www.ninosport.com
they have everything there
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 10:24 PM
  #3  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
It's definately going to be easier to mod the 5.0, what with the smaller motor and more simplistic design and whatnot.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #4  
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Joined: December 5, 2006
Posts: 31,454
Likes: 71
From: Trapped in Minnesota
5.0 all the way!



(like I'd know though! )
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #5  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
I wonder if anyone ever did a 2.3L swap
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 10:42 PM
  #6  
kevinspann's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
I'd go with the 5.0, but the only problem with them is, if you start to mod it you MIGHT have some idle/drivablity issues, which can be fixed by "downgrading" to the fox mustang computer, not to difficult of a conversion


Originally Posted by future9er24
I wonder if anyone ever did a 2.3L swap
I'd rather have a turbo 2.3 than a stupid 3.8 non-split port junk engine

I might do this swap one day....
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 10:45 PM
  #7  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
I'm sensing some hostility
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #8  
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Joined: December 5, 2006
Posts: 31,454
Likes: 71
From: Trapped in Minnesota
When and if() my current engine ever dies, I'd probably swap in a 2.3L Turbo!
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
Desi's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Thanks for th quick responses, everyone..tis why I love this forum. So, if things pan out then I'll prbably go ahead with the deal..ust wanted to hear some input on the 2 engines, also.. related to this... is the current 4.6 compatible with the 96+ version? or is it a totally differant animal?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #10  
theedge67's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2006
Posts: 2,872
Likes: 1
From: St. Louis Area
The current 4.6 is different. It is the same basic archetecture, but totally different parts. I believe the current (05+) 4.6 only shares 40% of it's parts with the older 4.6's.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #11  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Well, from 1996-98 the 4.6s were essentially the same. in 1999 a new PI head and intake system came about. Parts for these two are not always compatible. But, these motors did share one thing in common: both were 2 valve per cylinder SOHC motors. In 2005 the 2v motor was dropped entirely, and the 3v motor was introduced, So parts from there won't fit any other 4.6.

also keep in mind that any Cobra or Mach 1 from 1996-2004 will not have compatible parts due to the fact that they are DOCH, and have 4 valves per cylinder
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #12  
Desi's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Well, the GT fell through, but I may have a shot at a 97 5spd. v6 for $2,000.00....gonna see what goes, not really lookin for a 3.8 but if the price is right...
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #13  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Well if you like the car, go for it, but be forewarned, its a bit harder to make power out of that car than a comparable GT.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2007 | 05:49 PM
  #14  
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Joined: December 5, 2006
Posts: 31,454
Likes: 71
From: Trapped in Minnesota
Good Luck!! V6s are still cool! All that matters is that it's a Mustang, unless your power hungry! (I'm dying for a 5.0 but I'll never sell!!)
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #15  
mr_speedvision's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 3, 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Go for the v6, look around for a v8 doner. A rollover or a car hit in the rear. Swap everything into the v6...
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #16  
Desi's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 1, 2006
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Sorry to disappoint all, but no SN95 for me
BUT!!! I think I'll be alright
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=62904
The Boss is Back!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
Infamous_blackbeard
Introductions
5
Oct 8, 2015 10:45 PM
Christopher Fox Wallace
Fox Mustangs
1
Sep 26, 2015 11:55 AM
Ray11
2010-2014 Mustang
2
Sep 25, 2015 12:43 PM
VinnyD
Introductions
2
Sep 18, 2015 01:19 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 AM.