V6 Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang V6 Performance and Technical Information

Performance Speculation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/17/04, 04:53 PM
  #21  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by orange3.9stang@October 17, 2004, 7:00 AM
And still no Traction-Lok option from the factory !!

More HP and same torque as the '82 GT (157HP @ 4200 / 240 ft/lb @ 2400), which I believe came std. with a 7.5" T-Lok differential. I know the '83-84 GT's came stock with T-Lok ... 175 HP @ 4200 / 245 ft/lb @ 2400.

However my '04 had the "one wheel peel" pretty bad So the '05 is taking up even further in the performance catagory, yet Ford still sees no need to offer Traction-Lok. Heck, even GM offered it on their V6 Camaro / Firebirds up until they were eliminated ... you could even get Dual Exhaust (pretty chrome tips coming from the same crossflow single muffler anyway).

Doug
Although I will be getting a GT, I agree with you Doug, Ford is missing the boat on the V6.

I've been saying this since January, that Ford should have a "Sport" package option for the V6.

It should consist of the following:

1. Full dual exhaust (+10 or more HP)
2. 17" wheels and tires - wheel style unique to the V6 Sport
3. GT suspension
4. GT brakes
5. GT 8.8" Traction Lock rear axle
6. Some unique trim elements


There is a market for such a Mustang, Ford doesn't understand it though.
Old 10/18/04, 07:26 AM
  #22  
Legacy TMS Member
 
orange3.9stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 20, 2004
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
They could even stick with the 7.5" axle if it were to make the been counters happy. This would however add one more different axle assembly to the assembly line (already have 3), so it may be easier and cheaper to put the existing GT axle assembly in instead as you stated.

However, 2005 is the FIRST YEAR (since '94 anyway) that you can get the GT / Sport Bucket Seats in a V6. This is a big step for Ford, just wish the availabilty was not limited to only the RED accent package (which I do like by the way).
Old 10/21/04, 05:57 AM
  #23  
GT Member
 
justgreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 22, 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
orange 3.9 you hit the nail on the head: across the board, ford has kept the options list to a mininum strictly for manufacturing costs. the less options, the less money it cost to build. that's why you won't see dvd navigation, heated seats, etc....popular options for sure but ford wouldn't be able to sell the deluxe v6 for under 20k if they had to run all the extra lines. having said all that, i am sorely disappointed that the 4.0 doesn't have a sway bar in the back...the v6 snugged up against the firewall just begs for a tighter rear end for the twisties. jackg 90seville 95k
Old 10/21/04, 06:59 AM
  #24  
Legacy TMS Member
 
orange3.9stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 20, 2004
Location: N.E. Wisconsin
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally posted by justgreat@October 21, 2004, 6:00 AM
i am sorely disappointed that the 4.0 doesn't have a sway bar in the back...the v6 snugged up against the firewall just begs for a tighter rear end for the twisties. jackg 90seville 95k
Both my 1994 and 1998 V6's had rear sway bars from the factory, but Ford started eliminating it in '97-98. My '98 had the Sport Appearance Group (w/ base GT 16" wheels and "H" Speed rated "High Performance All Season" tires) and a 5-Speed and figured this was the connection This was a big subject on V6Power in '99-00, and through a survey we found that there was no magic combo. Sport Group may have been part of the key, but it was hit-or-miss ... some but not all 5-Speed cars had them and it was the same with Automatic Sport Group equipped cars.

Needless to say, that rear bar came off the '98 before I sold it and went on my '04 !! Since then, I have become pretty good friends with the new owner, and he is currently trying to find a used one on e-bay.

By the way, '98 was the ONLY YEAR to date that Ford offered an optional "H" rated High Performance (over the base S/T speed rated Touring) tire on a V6 Mustang.

Before my '04 had a 100 miles on it, I did a tire exchange with a local tire shop. There was no way I was putting up with 20-40k miles of those crappy Goodyear Eagle LS's ... the trade cost me $325.50 and I now have "W" speed rated BFG G-Force KDWS (Ultra-High Performance All Season) tires.

Doug
Old 10/21/04, 01:37 PM
  #25  
GT Member
 
justgreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 22, 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one point i failed to note about the rear end of the 05 is the panhard rod which helps to control the sideways motion of the axle...since the mounting points are further inboard than the sway bar it has limited ability to stabilize the axle...possibly, that's why they left the bar off the back on the v6, the panhard rod does a good enough job of controlling the rear end laterally. that, and the cost savings. jackg 90seville 95k
Old 11/29/04, 12:26 AM
  #26  
Member
 
dafaic's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 29, 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 1500 miles on my new silver V6 and I would defintly think it would run with a 94/95 gt auto. I use to have one about 3 years ago and although the torque is quite different the 5 speed auto and the way it shifts makes up for it (way better than the aode). I have already installed a flowmaster 50 series and a 10x10 k&n filter. The tone of the flow sounds awesome alomost V8 quality! If you have a new stang the airbox is 10x9.25 but you can look up on K&N by size a 10x10 call your parts store and order it I promise it fits! It's a little hard to latch the box closed but hey thats just means it seals good! Go with what works. Didn't want to wait 6 months on a K&N which is what they (K&N tech support) were saying would be the earliest one would be out!
Old 1/8/05, 07:27 PM
  #27  
Member
 
DanK's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 8, 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't believe some people. "The horsepower is the same" and means it should keep up with a V8 because the horspower is close. The fact is it takes torque to get a car moving. I would sacrifice a few hp for even more torque. Just pointing out not to oversimplify things. That's kinda ricer like IMO. BTW, I too am interested in an '05 V6 but would immediately turbocharge it.
Old 1/9/05, 12:53 AM
  #28  
Member
 
dafaic's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 29, 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well i raced a 98 Auto GT tonight bone stock and I won. I won from a stop from a 30 punch and from a 80 punch.
Old 1/9/05, 02:33 AM
  #29  
Mach 1 Member
 
TURBO 05's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
technology is great, my 5.0 conv. stick, stock ran a best of 14.6 before any mods. I bet the V6 will run near that and that 1 liter down and 2 cylinders down, i am impressed....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
6
3/30/21 09:29 AM
oneeyedgiant
GT
11
11/16/15 12:23 PM
tj@steeda
Auto Shows and Events
0
9/30/15 07:02 PM
GeoWett
GT
3
9/30/15 06:40 AM
Evil_Capri
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
2
9/25/15 12:56 PM



Quick Reply: Performance Speculation



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.