V6 Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang V6 Performance and Technical Information

Dyno Results: Zex - 278 RWHP V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2/8/06, 11:08 AM
  #21  
GT Member
 
Gash05's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 18, 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol whoa there...300 may be a bit too much hehe
Old 2/8/06, 11:12 AM
  #22  
GT Member
 
DrumStyxs10's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i figure hey if i blow the engine ill just get a custom jack roush 800 hp crate engine. But seriously i cant decide what to do, i know a tc/sc is probably the best to go with but i really want to upgrade some internals and then do a nos/tc setup, cant wait to see what your heads/cams do gash! after that and then seeing fazm with the turbo i will decide if it is worth it.
Old 2/8/06, 11:15 AM
  #23  
GT Member
 
Gash05's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 18, 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well at first i wasnt going with the H/C/I setup, but ever since i was told that better internals will make better use of PSI (more efficient use)...then I was sold...the guy at TMA turbo said a stock motor on 11 psi will create, for example, 350rwhp, but a beefier motor with a port job at 11 psi will creat 400-450rwhp...these are just average numbers but are still pretty close to real-world application...PLUS, the better internals you have, the harder you can push the beast and you wont have to resort to a crate motor [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img], even though that'd be sweet as heck
Old 2/8/06, 11:18 AM
  #24  
GT Member
 
DrumStyxs10's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you actually hit 270 NA i might honestly have to do that before i hit up the turbo
Old 2/8/06, 11:30 AM
  #25  
GT Member
 
Gash05's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 18, 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well look at it this way...I always make charts so here ya go! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

Note: These are all estimates, I have my real chart on my home computer

170RWHP Stock
==========
+15RWHP - C&L and Tuner
+15RWHP - Full exhaust (O/R H-pipe and dual setup)
+15RWHP - Long Tube headers (may produce more with a port job since they flow better)
+25RWHP - Ported Heads
+15RWHP - Custom Camshaft
+10RWHP - Ported Intakes + Ported Throttle Body
==========
265RWHP

Yes they are rounded off, but seriously...you got the 15rwhp from the tune and intake which is about average I'd say. You got the 7-10rwhp from exhaust setup and about 5rwhp from the off-road pipe. I'm almost willing to guarantee I will net over 15rwhp from long tubes, and coupled with the FULL port job and custom cam (which all take advantage of the full exhaust + LT's), you're gonna net well over 260 at the wheels. With 260rwhp N/A you got yourself a stock 2005 GT. Then you get the LCA's, gears, TT, nitrous. Hopefully some others will follow me in my path. It's a lot harder I think but a lot more worthwhile in the longrun.

EDIT: If you're wondering where I get my numbers for the H/C/I job, these are taken on average from the members at 3.8mustang.

An average 2003 v6 automatic will net around 220-230 at the wheels with:
-Heads
-Camshaft
-Intakes
-Throttle Body
-Tuner
-Pullies (they get around 8-10rwhp with em, lucky bastards)
-Dual setup with O/R pipe

So remember, they make about 145rwhp stock, so this is an 80rwhp average increase without Long Tubes or a CAI (because they get about 2rwhp from CAI's so they aren't even counted most times). Okay, enough ranting for me and I appologize for the highjack, Rygen...but this is good stuff!!! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon_mrgreen.gif[/img]
Old 2/8/06, 11:51 AM
  #26  
GT Member
 
Gash05's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 18, 2005
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, another selling point is the sound you'll get...check this 3.8 out:

http://www.mustangevolution.com/gallery/sh...48/limit/recent

he has everything i want except the LT's....*ahhhhh*
Old 2/8/06, 07:24 PM
  #27  
Cobra Member
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's an old Nitrous sheet with A/F....

Old 2/8/06, 08:24 PM
  #28  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Thomas S's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I'm really surprised they went past 6000rpm! They took it all the way to 6400rpm.
Old 2/8/06, 08:30 PM
  #29  
Mach 1 Member
 
Zodiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6400 is a bit high I think.. I wouldnt run it past 6K on a dyno.. heck, I rarely take it past that on the track. I certainly dont know if I would with the nitros or not.. tough decision. Most dyno runs ARE cut around 5400 though.. you can just see the power's peaked and is leveling off. Hmmm im a little out of it right now, ill have to come back to this later.
Old 2/9/06, 04:04 AM
  #30  
Cobra Member
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(BlackLX4.0 @ February 8, 2006, 10:27 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I'm really surprised they went past 6000rpm! They took it all the way to 6400rpm.
[/b][/quote]

I certainly agree... I think when we spray, Lidio alway stops well before 6,000... N/A he'll goto 6000... certainly not 6400...
Old 2/9/06, 05:06 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(scrming @ February 9, 2006, 6:07 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I certainly agree... I think when we spray, Lidio alway stops well before 6,000... N/A he'll goto 6000... certainly not 6400...
[/b][/quote]


I will be quite frank here, while I am pumped over my numbers, I am not feeling good about this dyno sheet. I’m not happy with the curve, the fact that he ran the car to 6400 rpm.

Now, this means two things, one is that the car is not tuned optimally or two is they did a single run like this just to push the car. Chris told me he had a conservative track tune on it for the Zex, and that he likes to keep his AF around 12.2 to 12.7. In fact, my street tune from him is 12.7. He says he never puts a tune on a car at 13.5.

However, I want answers, if my car isn’t at 278 on the track tune he really put on the car, then so be it. Dyno numbers are good information, but the track is where it counts, so while its fun to be competitive, I want to make sure my car is 100% safe. I’m also concerned he tuned this car like he would a 4.6 V8, and that is why he ran it to 6400. I’m one of two 4.0’s in his shop.

I also know that he uses the tail pipe sensor for AF, i.e. the long rod that goes into the muffler which here and on other forums, people told me is not the best way to measure AF. I’m also not convinced that he has the TQ management tuned 100%.

We will get to the bottom of this, and I really value everyone’s constructive input here. I’m determined to maximize the performance of this car while keeping the nitrous safe. Even if I have to go on a road trip to another shop, so be it.
Old 2/9/06, 06:57 AM
  #32  
GT Member
 
screaminyellin6's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 4, 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rygenstormlocke @ February 9, 2006, 7:09 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I will be quite frank here, while I am pumped over my numbers, I am not feeling good about this dyno sheet. I’m not happy with the curve, the fact that he ran the car to 6400 rpm.

Now, this means two things, one is that the car is not tuned optimally or two is they did a single run like this just to push the car. Chris told me he had a conservative track tune on it for the Zex, and that he likes to keep his AF around 12.2 to 12.7. In fact, my street tune from him is 12.7. He says he never puts a tune on a car at 13.5.

However, I want answers, if my car isn’t at 278 on the track tune he really put on the car, then so be it. Dyno numbers are good information, but the track is where it counts, so while its fun to be competitive, I want to make sure my car is 100% safe. I’m also concerned he tuned this car like he would a 4.6 V8, and that is why he ran it to 6400. I’m one of two 4.0’s in his shop.

I also know that he uses the tail pipe sensor for AF, i.e. the long rod that goes into the muffler which here and on other forums, people told me is not the best way to measure AF. I’m also not convinced that he has the TQ management tuned 100%.

We will get to the bottom of this, and I really value everyone’s constructive input here. I’m determined to maximize the performance of this car while keeping the nitrous safe. Even if I have to go on a road trip to another shop, so be it.
[/b][/quote]



Someone say roadtrip? Brings to mind Canonball Run [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
Old 2/9/06, 08:35 AM
  #33  
Thread Starter
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(screaminyellin6 @ February 9, 2006, 9:00 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Someone say roadtrip? Brings to mind Canonball Run [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


OK, just got off the phone with Excessive. They said my AF starts at 13 and goes down to 10 on my N20 tune. So I am safe there.
Old 2/9/06, 08:49 AM
  #34  
GT Member
 
screaminyellin6's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 4, 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rygenstormlocke @ February 9, 2006, 10:38 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
OK, just got off the phone with Excessive. They said my AF starts at 13 and goes down to 10 on my N20 tune. So I am safe there.
[/b][/quote]


Cool .... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
9/2/24 04:46 PM
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
10/15/15 10:03 AM
MustangGTCS13
2010-2014 Mustang
9
9/17/15 07:38 AM
JTB
Motorsports
1
9/3/15 10:50 AM



Quick Reply: Dyno Results: Zex - 278 RWHP V6



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM.