GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Whipple Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 11:58 PM
  #21  
woody1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 12, 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Import-Slaya@March 3, 2005, 7:42 PM
If it is 475rwhp, it'll probably be too much for the bottom end.
I think it is probably 475fwhp, which is about 400rwhp. That is supposed to be the safe limit for these engines.
B) Don't take this the wrong way.... But;Where did this info come from?
Valid un-named source, published article, documented test/calculations, rumor, SWAG, feelings or???
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #22  
Michael Freedman's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: December 9, 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Can anyone tell me if that is rwhp or fwhp. My guess is that it is fwhp.

Mike
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #23  
TommyV's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 574
Likes: 8
From: SandyEggo
I heard a rumor that the Ford Racing Parts twin screw (when it arrives), if installed by a dealer, will not void the factory warranty. That would be cool.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #24  
b_btrick's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 26, 2004
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
If you are talking about the HP and Torq numbers and where they come from, I believe the come from here ...
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1208
No mention as to whether it is at the wheels or at the transmission though, just the numbers.
sorry that was in response to woody1

about the new s/c and it not killing the warranty:
If you go here: http://www.fordracingparts.com/downl...gs/2005-pp.pdf
and scroll down to the superchargers you will see that it specifically says that it will void any engine warranty. That one is for the 2004 cobra but I would expect that it will be the same for anything that comes out for the 2005 mustangs.

Question ... are you sure that it will be a twin screw? I had thought that ford used roots type s/c's. would be great if they finally went to a twin screw especially one made in conjunction with whipple.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #25  
TommyV's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 574
Likes: 8
From: SandyEggo
Originally posted by b_btrick@March 5, 2005, 10:41 AM
Question ... are you sure that it will be a twin screw?
That's just what I had read from another site. I figured the warranty rumor was bad.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #26  
ZwerRacing's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Sound nice just what I was hopeing for... come on Santa!
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #27  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
Originally posted by b_btrick@March 5, 2005, 1:41 PM
Question ... are you sure that it will be a twin screw? I had thought that ford used roots type s/c's. would be great if they finally went to a twin screw especially one made in conjunction with whipple.
Well, the GT uses a twin-screw, the Lighting concept used a twin-screw, and the Mustang concept used a twin-screw. I think the consensus is that SVT has left the older rootes design behind as the twin-screw is simply a far superior piece.

Also, I would bet the house that the Cobra showing up in 2 weeks has a twin screw-under the hood, and that the final production model has one as well. I say all this to make a point, I would be surprised if there is not a twin-screw in the FPP parts catalog for the 05 Mustang.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #28  
Import-Slaya's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Originally posted by woody1+March 5, 2005, 1:01 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(woody1 @ March 5, 2005, 1:01 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Import-Slaya@March 3, 2005, 7:42 PM
If it is 475rwhp, it'll probably be too much for the bottom end.
I think it is probably 475fwhp, which is about 400rwhp. That is supposed to be the safe limit for these engines.
B) Don't take this the wrong way.... But;Where did this info come from?
Valid un-named source, published article, documented test/calculations, rumor, SWAG, feelings or???
[/b][/quote]


Just one of those things that is fairly common knowledge regarding this motor. My brother has a Vorteched 2000 (I think that is the year) GT, so I've been following these motors for a while. Go over here to confirm:
http://forums.modularpowerhouse.com/index.php?

These guys probably have more experience boosting mod motors than anyone else around. Plently of stock engines running very nice setups. They have *never* lost an engine with one of their kits. 400rwhp as the limit is pretty much dogma.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #29  
TorqueIT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Here's the Dyno they did...

Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:10 PM
  #30  
Import-Slaya's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 881
Likes: 1
Holy torque, Batman!

Numbers look good! (I assume it's an Excel graph of the actual dyno numbers, not just theoretical numbers)
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #31  
Fordracing200's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
Originally posted by jontall@March 3, 2005, 5:11 PM
Can this be used without upgrading to forged internals? I think 472hp is too much power for the stock bottom-end. What do you think.
yes, the hyperplastic, aluminum block, and powdered rods will slow the car down permanently until rebuilt
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #32  
tech's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
pardon my ignorance, but what do you need an air-to-water intercooler for on a screw-type supercharger. It blows air directly into the intake manifold doesn't it?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #33  
TorqueIT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 29, 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Import-Slaya@March 9, 2005, 6:13 PM
Holy torque, Batman!

Numbers look good! (I assume it's an Excel graph of the actual dyno numbers, not just theoretical numbers)

-------------------------

I believe this is actual dyno numbers.
This was simply what was posted on their webpage for the 05 supercharger, and it mentions a dyno, so I don't believe its theoretical..

http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1208
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 12:19 PM
  #34  
rhoover2's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 12, 2004
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Has anyone else noticed that the folks that have been boosting this motor were all talking about their dyno runs and how they would get back to us BUT ...

Yeah can you hear the silence? No more news or have they all popped the motors? If they have you would think that they would let us know at what amount of boost did they pop. I have been waiting for the news myself.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #35  
MilStang's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 22, 2004
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
bump.

And I agree with you. I have noticed how quite it has been lately too. Maybe they are still making modifications, tunes etc.

I am waiting with anticipation as well and hope to start hearing back on this. Still trying to decide whether to supercharge or turbo. Will continue to patiently :angry: wait and see.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
robjh22
Car Care
20
Dec 14, 2015 08:41 AM
JonathonK
2005-2009 Mustang
2
Sep 19, 2015 03:19 AM
MustangGTCS13
2010-2014 Mustang
9
Sep 17, 2015 07:38 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.