GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

TOOOO much boost.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/18/08, 01:03 AM
  #81  
Bullitt Member
 
65sohc's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 28, 2004
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bullitt995
And by the way, quoting car magazines like car and driver for technical info is not exactly the best route to go to prove a point. Though they happen to have found the truth by some kind of blind *** luck in your quote.
I realize now that you are master debater, so I'll make one more point and concede to your stubborness. How is it that Car and Driver, Automobile, and a dozen other publications I could have quoted all reported the same info? Independent research? Not likely. Not even by luck, blind *** or otherwise. At the time the Cobras were released to the press all the info came from SVT, including interviews with John Coletti. Now maybe you don't consider him a credible source either, but then again maybe you do. Ford found that the 4.6L engine would not pass their durability tests at the level of power they required. Rather than designing a new engine they took the shorter, cheaper route of using an engine already developed for forced induction, which for the Cobra was the SVT Lightning engine which happens to have a cast iron block. I don't recall anyone making the blanket assertion that cast iron blocks are superior to aluminum, only that in this particular case Ford has determined that their production cast iron Mustang engines will live at higher horsepower levels and not drive Ford closer to bankruptcy in warranty work.
Old 1/18/08, 09:18 AM
  #82  
Cobra R Member
 
Rebel73's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2005
Location: Lost Angels
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Magazine quotes aside, how many recent S197 motor failures can actually be attributed to the aluminum block, and not some part of the rotating assembly?
Old 1/18/08, 09:20 AM
  #83  
Bullitt Member
 
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None that I am aware of...
Old 1/18/08, 10:58 AM
  #84  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
Torched05stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 1, 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Check out the article in the lastest MM&FF mag (page 44)about the 510hp Roush P51A Mustang.
It states that internals (not the block) need to be upgraded to with stand their supercharger. Their saying its preliminary rating of 510hp and 510tq. Now that could be engine hp also, but ya know.


Also check out page 42 on the FR500S. It states that the FRPP "Aluminator" is the stock BLOCK only. But is it the 05 to 07 or is it the 08 which Ford shows being different between the two. More likely its the 08 block.
Old 1/18/08, 11:08 AM
  #85  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SONICBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Reagardless how safe or conserative your tune is whether your running 380,420, or 500 rwhp your still putting stress on these motors. Its just the less stress(less HP) you put on the motor the longer it will last. Also driving habits determine engine span. Those words came out of my tuners mouth. At the same time I know numerous people that have ran 450+rwhp for over several years...
Old 1/18/08, 12:49 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just do like I did and get the 4 to 5 lb boost saleen superchager and be happy! It has plenty of power and your engine will not blow up
Old 1/18/08, 10:42 PM
  #87  
GT Member
 
GIG4FUN's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 24, 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stangers
Thanks for posting this Tom281 .I'd hate for others to get the wrong impression about the Saleen S/C or getting any S/C.It does kick ares .
The guy just wanted to push the limit and found it .
-John
and he was ready to push it with the new engine ready to go obviously
Old 1/18/08, 11:00 PM
  #88  
Bullitt Member
 
Stangers's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 8, 2005
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats what I was thinking too.................
Old 1/19/08, 08:08 AM
  #89  
Bullitt Member
 
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it's who I THINK it is, there would be no problem with having a new motor ready to go... I just hope that they got some good data on the motor before or as it let go, or that it was part of a destructive-testing experiment, and not just a bunch of yahoos out to blow some **** up...
Old 1/19/08, 09:21 AM
  #90  
Bullitt Member
 
bored out's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 25, 2007
Location: Robins AFB
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/attach...7&d=1200332824

How much for that oil pump?
Old 1/19/08, 10:00 AM
  #91  
Bullitt Member
 
SoundGuyDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 13, 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bored out
The pump should be fine... Looking at that photo, it's not like there's any debris in the pickup or anything...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Whip
Fox Mustangs
5
7/12/11 10:10 AM
Baginoman2
GT Performance Mods
19
1/4/06 12:30 PM



Quick Reply: TOOOO much boost.....



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 PM.