GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 03:49 PM
  #1  
mike2005GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: October 6, 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Florida space coast
stock?

hey all I just got my mustang a few months ago. I have a question on the rear axle cover I found a sticker that has 3.55 on it what is the stock for a 2005 GT, and is the stock gear cover unpainted steel or aluminum. see I bought my car with 51,000 miles on it and the dealer made no mention of any improvements. any help would be greatly appreciated.
Attached Thumbnails stock?-sspx0113.jpg  

Last edited by mike2005GT; Dec 26, 2008 at 04:14 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #2  
classix_stang289's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
yes stock the 2005 gt has 3:55 gears, but that dont mean anything if they did a gear swap and put the cover back on with out ripping the sticker off. gear swaps for this car is a hot item, so make sure it is actually a 3:55 ratio. As for color i believe it is unpainted aluminum but dont quote me on that. when you change your gear oil make sure you go to ford and get a little bottle of limited slip additive(motorcraft brand ofcourse) because its to make sure that your rearend dont lock up. this you have to perform every time you change your gear fluid, its very important. Make sure you add the additive first then the gear oil of your choice and stay synthetic with the gear oil. anymore question please ask away i have a 2005 gt as well that i have had since febuary of 2005 and i know this car pretty good top to bottom.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #3  
mike2005GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: October 6, 2008
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Florida space coast
**** I thought I lucked out. is the h pipe stock for the gt?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
classix_stang289's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
yes it is stock for gt models
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #5  
steve-o's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 17, 2006
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Yup


Originally Posted by mike2005GT
**** I thought I lucked out. is the h pipe stock for the gt?
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #6  
classix_stang289's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by steve-o
Yup

you almost beat me to it. lol
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2008 | 07:02 AM
  #7  
69Mach1-409's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2007
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
Yup, 3.55 L/S is stock for 2005-2006 GT 5M models. It became an option for the GT 5M cars sometime in 2007.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 10:09 AM
  #8  
Rebel73's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
Yah,

I ain't so happy about the 3:31s on the 08s !!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #9  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
Originally Posted by Rebel73
Yah,

I ain't so happy about the 3:31s on the 08s !!
better mpg's?
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #10  
Rebel73's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
Originally Posted by Glenn
better mpg's?
I suppose, but being that I live only 6 miles from work, that's not my priority! I'm looking into some 3.73s...
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #11  
wjones14's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2004
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: Niantic CT
Originally Posted by Glenn
better mpg's?
yep, 3.31 would get marginally better mileage on the highway than the 3.55. In town, it would all depend on the driver (with a 5-speed manual).

My 1987 Mustang GT had a 2.73 axle, believe it or not. A 3.08 was optional on the 5M, standard on the automatic. In these times of fuel consciousness, I'm surprised that Ford doesn't offer a 2.73 "economy" axle as an option -- the car should get close to 30 mpg highway with that ratio.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 12:39 PM
  #12  
classix_stang289's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by wjones14
yep, 3.31 would get marginally better mileage on the highway than the 3.55. In town, it would all depend on the driver (with a 5-speed manual).

My 1987 Mustang GT had a 2.73 axle, believe it or not. A 3.08 was optional on the 5M, standard on the automatic. In these times of fuel consciousness, I'm surprised that Ford doesn't offer a 2.73 "economy" axle as an option -- the car should get close to 30 mpg highway with that ratio.

in my opinion, i dont care much about the gas mileage due to the fact that my car is not a daily driver. I ripped out those 3.55's and put in some 4.10's and im loving it.

hey does anyone think stepping it up to a 4.30 ratio would be streetable? is that too muchfor for the vehicle?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
Oct 15, 2015 10:03 AM
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
9
Oct 7, 2015 01:47 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
Ray11
2010-2014 Mustang
2
Sep 25, 2015 12:43 PM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:24 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 PM.