stock?
stock?
hey all I just got my mustang a few months ago. I have a question on the rear axle cover I found a sticker that has 3.55 on it what is the stock for a 2005 GT, and is the stock gear cover unpainted steel or aluminum. see I bought my car with 51,000 miles on it and the dealer made no mention of any improvements. any help would be greatly appreciated.
Last edited by mike2005GT; Dec 26, 2008 at 04:14 PM.
yes stock the 2005 gt has 3:55 gears, but that dont mean anything if they did a gear swap and put the cover back on with out ripping the sticker off. gear swaps for this car is a hot item, so make sure it is actually a 3:55 ratio. As for color i believe it is unpainted aluminum but dont quote me on that. when you change your gear oil make sure you go to ford and get a little bottle of limited slip additive(motorcraft brand ofcourse) because its to make sure that your rearend dont lock up. this you have to perform every time you change your gear fluid, its very important. Make sure you add the additive first then the gear oil of your choice and stay synthetic with the gear oil. anymore question please ask away i have a 2005 gt as well that i have had since febuary of 2005 and i know this car pretty good top to bottom.
yep, 3.31 would get marginally better mileage on the highway than the 3.55. In town, it would all depend on the driver (with a 5-speed manual).
My 1987 Mustang GT had a 2.73 axle, believe it or not. A 3.08 was optional on the 5M, standard on the automatic. In these times of fuel consciousness, I'm surprised that Ford doesn't offer a 2.73 "economy" axle as an option -- the car should get close to 30 mpg highway with that ratio.
My 1987 Mustang GT had a 2.73 axle, believe it or not. A 3.08 was optional on the 5M, standard on the automatic. In these times of fuel consciousness, I'm surprised that Ford doesn't offer a 2.73 "economy" axle as an option -- the car should get close to 30 mpg highway with that ratio.
yep, 3.31 would get marginally better mileage on the highway than the 3.55. In town, it would all depend on the driver (with a 5-speed manual).
My 1987 Mustang GT had a 2.73 axle, believe it or not. A 3.08 was optional on the 5M, standard on the automatic. In these times of fuel consciousness, I'm surprised that Ford doesn't offer a 2.73 "economy" axle as an option -- the car should get close to 30 mpg highway with that ratio.
My 1987 Mustang GT had a 2.73 axle, believe it or not. A 3.08 was optional on the 5M, standard on the automatic. In these times of fuel consciousness, I'm surprised that Ford doesn't offer a 2.73 "economy" axle as an option -- the car should get close to 30 mpg highway with that ratio.
in my opinion, i dont care much about the gas mileage due to the fact that my car is not a daily driver. I ripped out those 3.55's and put in some 4.10's and im loving it.
hey does anyone think stepping it up to a 4.30 ratio would be streetable? is that too muchfor for the vehicle?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM




