Dyno results
On a Mustang Dyno, she pulled 258rwhp and 278rwtq. Using a 15% drivetrain loss for a 5spd manual, that comes to 303hp and 327lbft at the flywheel. Works for me! Now I have a good baseline and will work from here to get her to 300rwhp.
Originally posted by GTJeff@January 26, 2005, 10:04 PM
MTAS:
After losing the trap, has your check engine light come on or any other issues - engine running lean etc ? Are you still using the factory air filter?
MTAS:
After losing the trap, has your check engine light come on or any other issues - engine running lean etc ? Are you still using the factory air filter?
No CE light, and actually the car still runs rich according to the A/F reading from the dyno runs. I think leaning it out via reflash will help too. Still using the factory paper filter and airbox too.
[/quote]
That's great. I guess the computer has enough flexibility to at least adjust for the trap removal...
Is your gas mileage better?
[/quote]
That's great. I guess the computer has enough flexibility to at least adjust for the trap removal...
Is your gas mileage better?
Originally Posted by GTJeff,January 26, 2005, 11:14 PM
No CE light, and actually the car still runs rich according to the A/F reading from the dyno runs. I think leaning it out via reflash will help too. Still using the factory paper filter and airbox too.
Is your gas mileage better?
[/quote]
My gas mileage hasn't gone up that I've noticed, averaging around 19MPG with every tank.
MTAS
I have a similar car to yours and my MPG went up from 19 mpg to 19.2 mpg w/o the hc trap.
I have yet to get a kn filter, but I would expect about 15 to 20 percent gains if my old 03 gt is any comparison.
I am holding out for a CAI, but the tax man really wants my money this year. Must find more deductions.
I have a similar car to yours and my MPG went up from 19 mpg to 19.2 mpg w/o the hc trap.
I have yet to get a kn filter, but I would expect about 15 to 20 percent gains if my old 03 gt is any comparison.
I am holding out for a CAI, but the tax man really wants my money this year. Must find more deductions.
Originally posted by 38special@January 29, 2005, 7:37 AM
MTAS
I have a similar car to yours and my MPG went up from 19 mpg to 19.2 mpg w/o the hc trap.
I have yet to get a kn filter, but I would expect about 15 to 20 percent gains if my old 03 gt is any comparison.
I am holding out for a CAI, but the tax man really wants my money this year. Must find more deductions.
MTAS
I have a similar car to yours and my MPG went up from 19 mpg to 19.2 mpg w/o the hc trap.
I have yet to get a kn filter, but I would expect about 15 to 20 percent gains if my old 03 gt is any comparison.
I am holding out for a CAI, but the tax man really wants my money this year. Must find more deductions.

I am holding out for a CAI, but the tax man really wants my money this year. Must find more deductions. 
[/quote]
Being a tax accountant, I would say that you need to get a SS # for your car and claim an additional dependent exemption ...

[/quote]
Being a tax accountant, I would say that you need to get a SS # for your car and claim an additional dependent exemption ...
Thanks for the info. I did a dyno on my manual 05 and got 273 rwhp/293 rwtq with only having the hydrocarbon trap out, and MMR Intake without a tune wich caused a check engine light to come on.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 24, 2015 08:15 PM
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
4
Sep 16, 2015 08:08 AM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:45 AM




