American Racing Headers... H Pipe Option
You're fine, you can ask away! I'm excited, too. Nick @ ARH is trying to work it out right now. He will hopefully have an answer for us by the end of the week! 
CR
Tillman Speed
CR
Tillman Speed
TillmanSpeed... when you have news can you PLEASE PM ME! I sometimes forget about this thread or lose it in the posting madness on this site! (which is why I bumped it the other day) I am totally waiting for these and I don't wanna miss out !!!
WUTimeUT give me a shout via PM for pricing, as I don't know whether you're looking for 1 5/8" or 1 3/4" catted or uncatted? I'd be glad to help you out!
As for the H pipe option, we're going to give Nick over at ARH a call Monday, after he has the weekend to work on it. We want to see how it goes.
As for the H pipe option, we're going to give Nick over at ARH a call Monday, after he has the weekend to work on it. We want to see how it goes.
As An Existing Owner
with a 1.75" ARH catted X pipe system, I'd love to see the difference in performance but any comparison would have to be done by only swapping out one mid pipe for the other with all else being equal. It will be very interesting to see how the powerband is affected. I have absolutely no objection to the sound with the existing catted X pipe so for those of you that can't make a choice, you can't go wrong with either one!
I agree... you can't go wrong with either. The X Pipe gains are going to be alot more. This is just for those who are set on an H pipe sound, and don't mind the few ponies lost.
As for the cats, they have great clearance, as the case diameter on them is not bad at all, I believe it's around 4" round. They aren't big and bulky and hanging low like the competitors.
As cool as this option will be for the sound, I think when we post dyno comparisons people may steer back towards the X pipe. I may be wrong, but we'll see...
As for the cats, they have great clearance, as the case diameter on them is not bad at all, I believe it's around 4" round. They aren't big and bulky and hanging low like the competitors.
As cool as this option will be for the sound, I think when we post dyno comparisons people may steer back towards the X pipe. I may be wrong, but we'll see...
an x is only gonig to net you 2-5hp over an h. you will never feel 2-5hp and unless your a dyno queen looking to get every last hp, the h is the way to go. you might as well have the sound to back up the power.
Am I Missing Something Here?
I don't expect there to be a huge difference between the two, maybe 3-5 RWHP tops but I don't have any issue with the sound my X pipe makes now with Zoomers on. Given the choice, why would anyone want to throw HP away? Strictly over sound??? If you say, "it's only 2-3 HP here, or 2-3 HP there," when you add them all up it can make quite a difference in the end result. With a power adder, I expect the difference in efficiency between an X and H pipe would be even more pronounced than in a N/A system.
I don't expect there to be a huge difference between the two, maybe 3-5 RWHP tops but I don't have any issue with the sound my X pipe makes now with Zoomers on. Given the choice, why would anyone want to throw HP away? Strictly over sound??? If you say, "it's only 2-3 HP here, or 2-3 HP there," when you add them all up and it can make quite a difference in the end result. With a power adder, I expect the difference in efficiency between an X and H pipe would be even more pronounced than in a N/A system.
besides the fact most exhausts have dynoed a loss of torque and HP to a gain of minimally 1hp. thsoe are real world tests, not controlled enviornment tests done by the manufactuer. rememebr the exhaust shootout article in i beleive was MMFF? Yet many people changed the sond anyway.
I personally think it's going to be approximately 8 RWHP. They dyno comparison will be fun. I would love it if it was only 2-3. That would make the H pipe a popular option.
CR
CR



