05mustangGT vs 05 GTO
GT Member
Joined: January 19, 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Fordracing200@June 2, 2005, 1:40 PM
haha, dunno if that was a burn or a compliment for the GTO??
haha, dunno if that was a burn or a compliment for the GTO??
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,657
Likes: 2
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally posted by BlueSuperGoat@June 2, 2005, 4:14 PM
Why would that be a burn? What do you think GTO stands for?
Why would that be a burn? What do you think GTO stands for?
GT Member
Joined: January 19, 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally posted by holderca1@June 3, 2005, 8:17 AM
I thought it was Gas Tires and Oil.
I thought it was Gas Tires and Oil.
Hey, what does idk stand for?
GT Member
Joined: January 19, 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally posted by conv_stang@June 21, 2005, 5:45 PM
yeah the GTO is a good car. but they should have called is something else. just like ford should come up with a new name for their SE's
yeah the GTO is a good car. but they should have called is something else. just like ford should come up with a new name for their SE's
Cam Tease
Joined: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Considering goats are being marked down $5k plus employee discount, plus however well you haggle, you could conceivably get one for around the same price as a well equipped stang GT. And when money is taken out of the equation, the GTO is the superior car.
Shelby GT500 Member
Joined: March 10, 2004
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 2
From: Sherman, TX
Originally posted by AnotherMustangMan@June 30, 2005, 9:24 PM
And when money is taken out of the equation, the GTO is the superior car.
And when money is taken out of the equation, the GTO is the superior car.
Shelby GT500 Member
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Originally posted by conv_stang@June 21, 2005, 4:45 PM
yeah the GTO is a good car. but they should have called is something else. just like ford should come up with a new name for their SE's
yeah the GTO is a good car. but they should have called is something else. just like ford should come up with a new name for their SE's
Same goes to the GTO, but they went with the latter idea thus it flopped.
Amazing how an name has such a big impact eh
GT Member
Joined: March 13, 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Originally posted by AnotherMustangMan@June 30, 2005, 9:24 PM
Considering goats are being marked down $5k plus employee discount, plus however well you haggle, you could conceivably get one for around the same price as a well equipped stang GT. And when money is taken out of the equation, the GTO is the superior car.
Considering goats are being marked down $5k plus employee discount, plus however well you haggle, you could conceivably get one for around the same price as a well equipped stang GT. And when money is taken out of the equation, the GTO is the superior car.
Superior car?
OK....
it has 1.4 liters more
100hp more
80lb-ft torque
but....
0-60 is the same as the mustang GT
and its only .1 sec faster in the 1/4 mile.... i don't call that superior for a car that has an msrp of $6,665 more than the mustang GT
the car has less space and still weighs more too.. 7cubic feet of trunk space compared to 13cubic feet i believe...