General Mustang Chat Not Model Year Specific

Road & Track Provides new Details on Mustang Ecoboost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2014 | 01:02 PM
  #1  
Detroit Steel's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Staff
 
Joined: April 24, 2014
Posts: 295
Likes: 13
Road & Track Provides new Details on Mustang Ecoboost



Clearly, we all probably should just move on from the debate over whether the Mustang Ecoboost is a fitting name for the new model of the pony car.

It’s a done deal now as Ford is already kicking up promotions for the car by holding a recent closed-course ride-along for a few select journalists including the guys at Road & Track.

Notice I wrote “ride-along” as those who attended the event weren't allowed to actually drive the car. That'll come later.

More on the blog.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 07:04 PM
  #2  
rynaldo's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 11, 2014
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: The Woodlands, TX
It's a real shame what they have done to our beloved Mustang...
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Originally Posted by rynaldo
It's a real shame what they have done to our beloved Mustang...
Yeah . . . darn retro theme over the last 10 years has been a "sore eye!"
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 07:42 PM
  #4  
Joeywhat's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2014
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 41
From: Motor City
The Ecoboost does look fun....good amount of power, a bit of weight savings, and high powered four cylinders are fun.

Haters gonna hate.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 10:11 PM
  #5  
kcoTiger's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: December 20, 2011
Posts: 4,326
Likes: 53
From: CenTex...sort of
The Ecoboost 4 is a hell of a lot better than an Econobox 4. It was going to happen. Anyone crying over it simply doesn't want to admit the obvious.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 10:21 PM
  #6  
Joeywhat's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2014
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 41
From: Motor City
Originally Posted by kcoTiger
The Ecoboost 4 is a hell of a lot better than an Econobox 4. It was going to happen. Anyone crying over it simply doesn't want to admit the obvious.
I don't get the hate. I really don't. It just seems like blind bigotry by those stuck in the 60's and 70's. It's supposed to make the same power as the current V6, and even more torque. It's NOT a slouch by ANY means.

Sometimes I get the feeling some folks would be happier with some huge, under powered V8 being in it, that gets horrible mileage. I mean, the Ecoboost has more power then most Mustangs have ever had, since it was introduced.

People are acting like it's the worst possible thing to happen. Stop worrying about how many cylinders it has, and start worrying about how it actually performs.
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 04:03 AM
  #7  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
I don't get the hate. I really don't. It just seems like blind bigotry by those stuck in the 60's and 70's. It's supposed to make the same power as the current V6, and even more torque. It's NOT a slouch by ANY means. Sometimes I get the feeling some folks would be happier with some huge, under powered V8 being in it, that gets horrible mileage. I mean, the Ecoboost has more power then most Mustangs have ever had, since it was introduced. People are acting like it's the worst possible thing to happen. Stop worrying about how many cylinders it has, and start worrying about how it actually performs.
It was sad driving my 03 GT, knowing the Honda Accord V6 next to me had almost as much power...or the Genesis Coupe I4/Focus ST had more power

BUT, none of those cars would ever sound like the BEAST that my 4.6 with Bassani CB and catted X sounded like
Reply
Old May 17, 2014 | 04:48 PM
  #8  
Phil_R's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 22, 2010
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
I don't get the hate. I really don't. It just seems like blind bigotry by those stuck in the 60's and 70's. It's supposed to make the same power as the current V6, and even more torque. It's NOT a slouch by ANY means.

Sometimes I get the feeling some folks would be happier with some huge, under powered V8 being in it, that gets horrible mileage. I mean, the Ecoboost has more power then most Mustangs have ever had, since it was introduced.

People are acting like it's the worst possible thing to happen. Stop worrying about how many cylinders it has, and start worrying about how it actually performs.
I have to take issue with those stuck in the 60's and 70's comment. The first Mustangs in the mid 60's and the very early 70's looked and ran great, IMHO! Also, even though things evolve, I personally liked the looks of them. (From 64 1/2 to 73, 69 being my favorite)

The Ecoboost 4 cylinder might be a good engine, however to me a performance car needs that 8 cylinder engine & exhaust note. As a daily driver, the 4 cylinder might offer great mileage and still good performance over a V6 as well, however a V8 I believe will have more options for power upgrades.

I personally do not care for the new 2015 style, however if that is what you and others like, I am glad for you all. I do not "hate" the new car nor the Ecoboost 4, I just personally like other more retro styled Mustangs.


Regards,
Phil

Last edited by Phil_R; May 17, 2014 at 04:58 PM.
Reply
Old May 18, 2014 | 12:41 PM
  #9  
wanted33's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: February 26, 2012
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 392
From: Down south in Dixie
I will say the thing does look good in yellow.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tukatz
Road Trips
23
Oct 13, 2023 10:01 AM
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
Nov 3, 2022 08:50 PM
TrueBlue302
Repair and Service Help
5
Jul 23, 2015 06:13 AM
BentCopper
Introductions
8
Jul 21, 2015 08:35 PM
Ecostang
Introductions
5
Jul 11, 2015 09:06 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 AM.