General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

The elephant in the room (and it's wearing a bow tie)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/20/15, 08:36 PM
  #41  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Am I the only one more concerned with how the power is able to be put down, than how much a dyno says the engine can make?

It doesn't need to be the fastest car out there. If it can be "fast enough" while offering a more refined ride, better mileage and a better interior then I think it will ultimately be a much better vehicle. The other companies can keep the horsepower war awards as all they're doing is tossing a ton of power into a crap car and calling it good.
Old 10/20/15, 09:20 PM
  #42  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Gabe
I would actually still be really interested in a stroked Coyote, 5.xx displacement.
Leave the bore as is and add some stroke.
I'd love to see what could come of that.
I bet that 500+ hp N/A would easily be attainable, with some worked heads/cams, a CJ intake and a big TB

Well in order to get the 5.2 there you see what Ford had to do. Like I said in a previous post that .2 bump in displacement would get a standard Coyote up to or a bit past 450 horsepower.


Ford would need around 5.8 to 6.0 liters to hit 500 hp.


The bore at the stock 92.2 mm would require a stroke of over 108.7 mm which would make it even longer than what was used in the 5.4 and 5.8 used in the GT500 and would require nearly a 7" connection rod length (center to center) to maintain a similar rod/stroke ratio which would make the rod about an inch longer compared to the 5.0 unit which in turn would require a corresponding increase in deck height to house.


Piston speed for a stock coyote at 7,000 rpm is 4257.9 feet per minute and to get the same sort of piston speed you would have to lower the rev limit to just under 6,000 rpm.


the 2013/14 GT50-0 had an over rev feature that allowed it to temporarily rev to 7,000 rpm and the piston speed was almost 4860 feet per minute. In the same scenario this 5.8 coyote would be limited to just a bit over 6800 rpm in a temporary over rev but being a volume engine Ford would most likely limit the engine to around the Road Runner's 4562 feet per minute or about 6400 rpm or lower.
Old 10/20/15, 09:22 PM
  #43  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
Am I the only one more concerned with how the power is able to be put down, than how much a dyno says the engine can make?

It doesn't need to be the fastest car out there. If it can be "fast enough" while offering a more refined ride, better mileage and a better interior then I think it will ultimately be a much better vehicle. The other companies can keep the horsepower war awards as all they're doing is tossing a ton of power into a crap car and calling it good.

The Camaro handles its 455 horsepower well. The times achieved were in 55 degree weather and the auto and manual cars were within a tenth or two of each other.
Old 10/20/15, 10:33 PM
  #44  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
The Camaro handles its 455 horsepower well. The times achieved were in 55 degree weather and the auto and manual cars were within a tenth or two of each other.
And the times were neck and neck with GT350 times lol.

Though, if I could get a clean launch, my car should be around those times too. I just need to install all my suspension stuff that I've been sitting on. And actually have my tires warmed up.
Old 10/20/15, 10:34 PM
  #45  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Then I would need to actually nail the 2-3 and 3-4 shifts, which considering my MT-82, is highly unlikely. Though I also need to install my BF bracket too LOL
Old 10/29/15, 12:24 PM
  #46  
Cobra Member
 
JoeMidnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2014
Location: Canada, Ontario
Posts: 1,099
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by laserred38
And the times were neck and neck with GT350 times lol.

Though, if I could get a clean launch, my car should be around those times too. I just need to install all my suspension stuff that I've been sitting on. And actually have my tires warmed up.
Originally Posted by laserred38
Then I would need to actually nail the 2-3 and 3-4 shifts, which considering my MT-82, is highly unlikely. Though I also need to install my BF bracket too LOL
I couldn't do it. I couldn't buy something for this car and not have it installed the same day!


I would not be opposed to the new Camaro. My only and stipulation is that it would need to be a convertible. I test drove the 2014 model (before I bought my S197) and I did not like the small windows and the feeling I got of being inside of a tank.
Old 10/29/15, 12:31 PM
  #47  
Cobra Member
 
JoeMidnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2014
Location: Canada, Ontario
Posts: 1,099
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tom281
There is always someone or something faster.
Originally Posted by laserred38
Yep...
THIS is why the V6 is king.


LOADS of performance AND has the fuel economy to boot.

My last fill up, I was averageing 27-28MPG

Best of both worlds!
Old 10/29/15, 03:10 PM
  #48  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeMidnight
THIS is why the V6 is king.


LOADS of performance AND has the fuel economy to boot.

My last fill up, I was averageing 27-28MPG

Best of both worlds!
What about the 2.3L? Heck I liked it so much I bolted one on top of my 5L! Ha
Old 10/29/15, 03:47 PM
  #49  
Mach 1 Member
 
3point7's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 11, 2014
Posts: 837
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeMidnight
THIS is why the V6 is king.


LOADS of performance AND has the fuel economy to boot.

My last fill up, I was averageing 27-28MPG

Best of both worlds!
Originally Posted by tom281
What about the 2.3L? Heck I liked it so much I bolted one on top of my 5L! Ha
Which supercharger did you go with Tom?

If you look at the bore and stroke on the 3.7 it's pretty much the 5.0 motor with two less cylinders. Makes sense from an engine development standpoint because it makes it more cost effective. Easier to develop a tried and true bottom end that they know all the ins and outs about. I enjoy mine. It offers good performance for a daily driver car and easy to maintain. I'm averaging 21.6 mpg right now on 93 octane.
Old 10/29/15, 04:03 PM
  #50  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Roush 2.3L blower. 670 hp package and i'm averaging just over 20 mpg.
Old 10/29/15, 05:34 PM
  #51  
Mach 1 Member
 
3point7's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 11, 2014
Posts: 837
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by tom281
Roush 2.3L blower. 670 hp package and i'm averaging just over 20 mpg.
Yea that's good mpg. I've looked at the ProCharger Supercharger for the 3.7 which pushes the car to 540 bhp with 10 psi and amazingly over 900 bhp with a modified engine. Gotta be forged everything and dipped in chrome or something lol.
Old 10/29/15, 08:29 PM
  #52  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
DarrenGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 16, 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 4,418
Received 212 Likes on 145 Posts
Originally Posted by houtex
The Camaro is hideous. Performance is one thing, but style is another, and that simply doesn't have any. Well, it does, sure, but only if you like ugly.

No thanks. I'll keep my ol' 'dated' S197 looks, thanks. I don't care if my 4.6 is walked by the LT1 or the Hemis, or even the Coyote.

She looks way better. And that's more important.

/I... well, shucks, I might be a little biased, but whatever.

The Camaro and it's driver's, good or bad, can run circles around me all day but i will still smile when i head off into the sunset with my s197.

I agree with you 100% on style.
Old 10/29/15, 10:10 PM
  #53  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by DarrenGT
The Camaro and it's driver's, good or bad, can run circles around me all day but i will still smile when i head off into the sunset with my s197.

I agree with you 100% on style.
My mother has a 2013 V6 RS convertible Camaro. Pretty much loaded. Awful car to drive. Tossing aside the fact that I hate convertibles, it's just not at all fun to drive. Has zero "feel" to it, I might as well just be in an Impala. Not to mention the interior is hideous. Even if my car was slower (which it's not...by a long shot) I'd still prefer it. I feel considerably more connected in my Mustang.
Old 11/2/15, 10:32 PM
  #54  
Cobra Member
 
2 Go Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Question

So when do the 2016 Camaro SS hit the streets ?
Old 11/3/15, 12:15 PM
  #55  
Mach 1 Member
 
=HYPERDRIVE='s Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
I'm impressed with the new camaro, but I'm waiting till dodge comes out with replacement to the challenger, make it weight close between the new 2 rivals, have the 6.4 as standard engine and drop 5.7, and tune it to 495 or even 500/500. Keep the relative lines and quad headlight and I might buy one. The replacement for challenger might be the car that either might get me to trade up, or make me decide to keep my current car forever, as that's still my plan at this point.

Last edited by =HYPERDRIVE=; 11/3/15 at 12:21 PM.
Old 11/4/15, 06:51 AM
  #56  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by =HYPERDRIVE=
have the 6.4 as standard engine and drop 5.7, and tune it to 495 or even 500/500.
I don't think they would dump the 5.7, the 5.7 is a good entry level V8 for people who want a V8 but don't want all the extra power or added insurance expense if the higher performance is a factor ( usually not but it could be).
Old 11/4/15, 07:58 AM
  #57  
Mach 1 Member
 
=HYPERDRIVE='s Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
I don't think they would dump the 5.7, the 5.7 is a good entry level V8 for people who want a V8 but don't want all the extra power or added insurance expense if the higher performance is a factor ( usually not but it could be).
I see your point, but I don't see how dodge would allow themselves to offer a V8 with 375hp at this point in 2018-2019 and try to be competitive with cars that have 430-455hp on base model V8. For them to modify and try to reach close hp numbers beyond 420hp on the 5.7 would not make it economical , while 6.4 has the power yet mpg are only 1-3 lower compared to the 5.7. At this point the current 5.7 has no future, so I'm betting that it will get discontinued in dodges line up, and can you imagine the amount of sh-t they would get when reviews would come out and everyone would laugh at how they only offer 375hp while others have 450+ (the 5.0 with DI should reach those numbers soon enough)
They will ave the alpha romeo Giulia platform ,and it looks like a promising platform on that car, make it weight same as camaro or mustang, stick a all aluminum 6.4, have it make at least current hp figures or go beyond and try to reach 500hp on that motor. Dodge might have a chance to even out play the new camaro.

Last edited by =HYPERDRIVE=; 11/4/15 at 08:06 AM.
Old 11/4/15, 08:01 AM
  #58  
Bullitt Member
 
Rodsmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 24, 2014
Location: Arizona
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Capitalism at work!!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonathonK
GT350
6
9/17/15 10:13 AM
mark0006
2010-2014 Mustang
9
9/4/15 10:41 AM
Evil_Capri
Ford Discussions
1
8/27/15 01:08 PM
GT/CS Guy
Ford Discussions
4
8/26/15 01:15 PM
Detroit Steel
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
29
8/21/15 11:09 AM



Quick Reply: The elephant in the room (and it's wearing a bow tie)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 PM.